HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2016, 3:52 AM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 313
07/14/16

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 10:26 PM
hotwheels hotwheels is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 427
Park Tower at Transbay Continues Downtown Evolution

Quote:
San Francisco's downtown core is a veritable hotbed of development activity. It seems no matter where you turn, you're face to face with construction hoarding or situated below a swinging tower crane. The Transbay Transit Center and its surrounding lands are the primary recipient of the city's latest round of tallest projects, including the Salesforce Tower and 181 Fremont, which are altering the composition of the skyline with every piece of steel placed. Set to continue the urban evolution of the downtown core is the Park Tower at Transbay, a 43-storey office tower by the team of Golub & Company, The John Buck Company, and MetLife.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 10:52 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 522
From the webcam, it appears that the caissons and perimeter shoring are complete and that installing the pipes for dewatering is almost done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2016, 5:34 PM
iamfishhead iamfishhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 111
Looks like they're packing up the heavy equipment. Sorry for the shaddow. I only noticed later in the day.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 2:46 AM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 522
excavation well underway
they built a pier for the crane this weekend
what's that green stuff they spray on every day?

pic from the webcam
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 5:33 AM
SFSkyline SFSkyline is offline
SimCity World Champ
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
excavation well underway
they built a pier for the crane this weekend
what's that green stuff they spray on every day?

pic from the webcam
The green stuff may be for dust control.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2016, 2:07 AM
iamfishhead iamfishhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 111
Looks like the foundation area is substantially excavated now and they're starting to pour concrete

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2016, 3:47 AM
SFSkyline SFSkyline is offline
SimCity World Champ
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamfishhead View Post
Looks like the foundation area is substantially excavated now and they're starting to pour concrete

I wonder if they went down to bedrock? With what's going on at Millenium, these guys have to be pissing themselves if they didn't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2016, 5:03 AM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamfishhead View Post
Looks like the foundation area is substantially excavated now and they're starting to pour concrete

Not sure exactly what's up with the concrete. They don't seem nearly deep enough for two levels of parking plus the thickness of a mat foundation. They didn't put in any rebar. I'm guessing the concrete is only temporary, maybe till they install the waling and cross bracing and start going deeper. Honestly, I don't know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 1:58 AM
iamfishhead iamfishhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 111
Looks like progress

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 2:53 AM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 682
The concrete is likely a low-sack slurry mix to provide ground stability for the equipment to place the waler system (it appears to be a somewhat wet and sloppy site). It is easy to excavate through to go deeper once the first level of supports are in place. Thanks for the pictures from such a great vantage point!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 4:16 AM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,141
Who's idea was it to put the west coast's financial center in the middle of a mud pit in earthquake country?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 4:55 AM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by botoxic View Post
The concrete is likely a low-sack slurry mix to provide ground stability for the equipment to place the waler system (it appears to be a somewhat wet and sloppy site). It is easy to excavate through to go deeper once the first level of supports are in place. Thanks for the pictures from such a great vantage point!
Thanks, botoxic, for that info.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 6:58 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
Who's idea was it to put the west coast's financial center in the middle of a mud pit in earthquake country?
Yeah, people sure knew all about tectonics/seismology back in the 1800s. And when they finally learned more about it in the 20th century, they never decided to uproot a major city and relocate it somewhere else! What were they thinking????? What a bunch of morans!!!11!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 3:33 PM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,141
Xanax?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 6:16 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,213
What, is the Financial District now DEAD or something?
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 6:56 PM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,141
Some up tight forumers up in here for sure. Touchy bunch!

Now let's just relax and not take ourselves so seriously, sheesh
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 7:19 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 522
I actually think this is a good question.

For example, see "The Manhattan Skyline: Why are there no tall skyscrapers between Midtown and Downtown?"

https://blog.epa.gov/blog/2015/07/th...-and-downtown/

There are other locations downtown where bedrock is much closer to the surface; Rincon Hill is an obvious example. So why are the sites zoned for the tallest buildings at this spot, requiring expensive 300 foot deep caissons? Is it to sculpt the skyline to look pretty from Treasure Island? To enable wayfinding to the Transbay Terminal? To maximize revenue to the Transbay JPA?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2016, 1:36 AM
iamfishhead iamfishhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
I actually think this is a good question.

For example, see "The Manhattan Skyline: Why are there no tall skyscrapers between Midtown and Downtown?"

https://blog.epa.gov/blog/2015/07/th...-and-downtown/

There are other locations downtown where bedrock is much closer to the surface; Rincon Hill is an obvious example. So why are the sites zoned for the tallest buildings at this spot, requiring expensive 300 foot deep caissons? Is it to sculpt the skyline to look pretty from Treasure Island? To enable wayfinding to the Transbay Terminal? To maximize revenue to the Transbay JPA?
Probably because this area south of market was available and underused (or used to be a freeway) and is close to transit. A lot of downtown is built-out, so their options were kinda limited. Where else would you even build these buildings?

I actually have a pretty nice book on skyscraper construction (I'm sure other people here would like it too). As it so nicely points out, you can build a skyscraper almost anywhere ... if you're willing to pay for and do the foundation work required. I'd imagine they try and build on bedrock in Manhattan when they can, zoning aside, because it's probably cheaper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2016, 3:43 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
Some up tight forumers up in here for sure. Touchy bunch!

Now let's just relax and not take ourselves so seriously, sheesh
Crying when someone pokes fun at your post is a great way to not take yourself seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
What, is the Financial District now DEAD or something?


RIP downtown SF.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:07 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.