HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2017, 12:04 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,614
SAN FRANCISCO | 30 Van Ness Ave | 400 FT | 40 FL (Approx)

Quote:
Sale of Mid-Market Tower Site Tentatively Approved
March 17, 2017
30 Van Ness Avenue

Rejected by San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors at the end of 2015, when the proposed purchase price was $80 million, the term sheet for the sale of the City’s five-story building at 30 Van Ness Avenue, a building which sits upon a prominent parcel which is currently zoned for development up to 400 feet in height, has been tentatively approved by the Board’s Budget and Finance Committee with a contract price of $70 million.

While $10 million less than previously proposed by Related California, Lendlease Development has agreed to offer 25 percent of the future 30 Van Ness units at below market rates versus 15 percent under the terms of the 2015-era deal, but with higher income limits for the additional 10 percent . . . .

San Francisco’s current Board of Supervisors are slated to vote on the sale next week.

http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...-approved.html

Conceptual renderings:




Rendering source: http://www.dilwortheliot.com/work-de...=30vanness&f=*

Estimated completion is 2020 (bound to slip).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2017, 5:54 PM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 684
Socketsite reporting that rather than wait for a Hub District Plan height increase, Lendlease Development will seek the passage of a Special Use District and amendments to the City Zoning Map to increase the tower height to 520 feet and add two stories of office to the existing podium.

The tower would contain 562 residential units, 25% priced at below market rate.



http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...een-drawn.html

Last edited by botoxic; Jun 29, 2017 at 6:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 4:01 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,052
One Oak (30 Van Ness) Moving Along

Removed - posted in wrong forum!!!!
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza Resident Since 1971 (the building everyone loves to hate :>)

Last edited by Jerry of San Fran; Sep 28, 2017 at 7:18 PM. Reason: Posted in Wrong Forum!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 5:02 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,614
^^Nope. You assume wrong.

This is NOT One Oak. This is across the street. Even addresses are on the east side of Van Ness. But the earlier post with photos makes it pretty clear where this is: The northeast corner of Market & Van Ness whereas One Oak is on the northwest corner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 7:20 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
^^Nope. You assume wrong.

This is NOT One Oak. This is across the street. Even addresses are on the east side of Van Ness. But the earlier post with photos makes it pretty clear where this is: The northeast corner of Market & Van Ness whereas One Oak is on the northwest corner.
Pedestrian - thanks for pointing out the error!!!!
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza Resident Since 1971 (the building everyone loves to hate :>)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2017, 7:48 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry of San Fran View Post
Pedestrian - thanks for pointing out the error!!!!
You are exceptionally welcome.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 5:05 PM
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 345
Looks good! I can't wait for it to come up in 2020
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 10:35 PM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,105
Kinda filler... But not so bad. Nice and modern. It's always cool to reuse part of an existing structure.
__________________
If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth. -Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 5:48 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerton View Post
Kinda filler... But not so bad. Nice and modern. It's always cool to reuse part of an existing structure.
Multiple people seem to be mixing up the upcoming projects around this area and their threads. This one isn’t reusing anything, but the one a block further south is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 2:33 PM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
Multiple people seem to be mixing up the upcoming projects around this area and their threads. This one isn’t reusing anything, but the one a block further south is.
According to the Socketsite article they are planing to reuse the current building and add couple of floors along with the tower of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 6:19 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,614
Anyone know the status of the Hub District Plan allowing this:


http://default.sfplanning.org/plans-...t-simulations/

Rather than this:


http://default.sfplanning.org/plans-...t-simulations/

and for this building, 520 ft rather than 400 ft? If it's approved I can change the thread title.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:23 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.