HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 9:34 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
7 Reasons Why High-Rises Kill Livability

7 Reasons Why High-Rises Kill Livability


September 29, 2014

By Taz Loomans

Read More: http://sustainablecitiescollective.c...ill-livability

Quote:
What do you do when you’re the city of Portland and millions of people are supposed to move into your city in the coming decades and you have an urban growth boundary? Build up, right? To a certain extent yes, but not above the fifth floor, says world-renown architect Jan Gehl. “I would say that anybody living over the fifth floor ought generally to be referring to the airspace authorities.

- You’re not part of the earth anymore, because you can’t see what’s going on on the ground and the people on the ground can’t see where you are,” he warns. As the Portland Comprehensive Plan update is underway, residents are looking on with alarm as the city is proposing to allow building heights up to 40 stories in such questionable places like historic neighborhoods and bridgeheads all in the name of density. --- The high-rise is not the only answer to density. In fact, it may be a very unsuitable solution that undermines the character, livability, social fabric and even the public health of a city.

- 1. High-rises separate people from the street: According to Gehl, a city is best viewed at eye-level. Sure the views from a high-rise can be stunning, but you aren’t able to see people in a way that allows for connection. Because it’s not as easy as walking out your front door, people who live on the high floors of a high-rise are less likely to leave their houses. This separates people from the outdoors, the city and from other people. --- “What high-rise does is separate large numbers of people from the street, so we end up with a city that is detached from street life, we end up with a city that is based on enclaves and gated communities,” says urban planning expert Michael Buxton.

- 2. High-rise scale is not the human scale: High-rises are simply so tall that they make no visual sense to a pedestrian at eye-level. You can’t even see the whole building unless you’re in another high-rise. You become lost and engulfed in glass and steel canyons which can be isolating and dehumanizing. --- The Preservation Institute tells us that when you walk through a traditional urban neighborhood, with buildings five or six stories high, you can see the faces of people looking out of their windows, and you can see personalizing details such as flowerpots in windows.

- 3. High-rises radically reduce chance encounters and propinquity: Because high-rises tend to separate people from the street and each other, they greatly reduce the number of chance encounters that happen, which are crucial to the liveliness of a city and to creating social capital. And because people are cooped up in tall buildings, they are less likely to experience propinquity, a concept introduced to me by architect and urban designer, Kevin Kellogg. Propinquity is “one of the main factors leading to interpersonal attraction. It refers to the physical or psychological proximity between people.

- 4. High-rises are vertical sprawl: How could high-rises possibly be sprawl as they take up so little actual land? Sprawl is when something is built inefficiently and takes up too much space. With high-rises, they take up too much vertical space for something (in this case dense housing) that could be achieved with much less height. Think of the South Waterfront in Portland, a sea of speculative high-rises that largely remain empty.

- 5. High-rises=gentrification and inequality; Low/Mid-rises=resiliency and affordability: According to Suzanne H. Crowhurst Lennard, co-founder and director of the Making Cities Livable International Council, “the construction industry is a powerful engine for fueling economic development. Tall buildings offer increased profits for developers. --- However, the higher a building rises, the more expensive is the construction. Thus, the tallest buildings tend to be luxury units, often for global investors. Tall buildings inflate the price of adjacent land, thus making the protection of historic buildings and affordable housing less achievable. In this way, they increase inequality.”

6. Are High Rises Even Green?: Contrary to public opinion, which thinks high-rises must be sustainable because they allow for so much density, Patrick Condon of the University of British Columbia says that high-rise buildings are not green at all. He says, “high-rise buildings are subject to the effects of too much sun and too much wind on their all-glass skins. And all-glass skins are, despite many improvements to the technology, inherently inefficient. --- Glass is simply not very good at keeping excessive heat out, or desirable heat in. Our high-rises, according to BC Hydro (the province of British Columbia’s main electric utility) data, use almost twice as much energy per square metre as mid-rise structures.”

7. High Rises are not good for your health: This assertion may sound laughable to some, but the effects of the high-rise on mental health have been researched and documented. Psychologist Daniel Cappon writes in the Canadian Journal of Public Health that high-rises keep children and the elderly from getting the exercise the extra effort it takes to get outside encourages them to stay at home and flip on the TV. --- High-rises, he says, also deprive people and especially children of “neighborhood peers and activities.” And he believes that the level of alienation and isolation, things that have been proven to negatively impact health and even shorten people’s lives, increase with the height of the building.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 9:41 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
There was a thread for this in the past: http://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=213457
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 12:38 AM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 937
This guy may be fighting a losing battle based on world trends...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 4:06 AM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,802
He's making up arguments to fit a preconceived notion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 5:00 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
She........

Although skywalks and outdoor connections to other buildings could solve the isolation issue and make a city more 3D.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 31, 2015, 6:16 PM
mhays mhays is online now
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,802
Residential buildings don't like the general public to have access. It's no different from the standard woodframe in that regard.

Highrises allow more people to live closer together, and closer to work. They allow cities to function far better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 7:21 PM
ThatOneGuy's Avatar
ThatOneGuy ThatOneGuy is offline
Come As You Are
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Constanta
Posts: 920
I'd rather live in a highrise than suburban sprawl.
__________________
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."
-Leonardo Da Vinci
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 8:26 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
Elevators?
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 8:45 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,493
The only place I ever really interacted and became friends with my neighbors was when I lived in a high rise in downtown Houston, I even had sex with one of my neighbors. So, I'd say this article is complete junk. In all the other places Ive lived in, even the ultra dense neighborhood I live in now, you never interact with your neighbors, but maybe that's because my neighbors now are all white trash but still. And growing up in suburban Houston we for sure never interacted with our neighbors. You see them drive into their garage in the big mcmansion and never see them after that.
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 11:52 PM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 937
Had no idea the sex of someone named Taz.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 12:47 AM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
If it's between sprawl or high=rises than high-rises win every time. But the ideal urban built form is still lowrise/midrise rowhouses/condos. San Francisco and Paris instead of Manhattan or Hong Kong.

That being said, there are numerous occasions (like the aforementioned Manhattan and Hong Kong) where geographical constraints require high-rises.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 5:38 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,512
There's a place for high-rises and there's a place where they should be restricted.

That photo looks like a hideous dystopian nightmare, who honestly wants to live there?

It may not be because of the fact that they're high-rises but more of high-rises done horribly wrong, having no consideration in their design about how they affect street life.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 7:52 PM
drumz0rz drumz0rz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
I'm not sure if that author has ever lived in a high rise.

He claims you shouldn't live above the 5th floor. Because the guy taking the elevator to 5 and the guy taking the elevator to 55 have such drastically different living accommodations...

Also that chance meeting thing is equally silly. What happens when you take the population of a few blocks of single family housing and stack them in a building? Well now they share hallways, elevators, gyms, common space... Sure some residents can keep to themselves, but I would argue in general a high rise increases the chance or meeting strangers by virtue of the increased density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.