Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon716
I think people miss the point with urban design half the time. If you make only the most luxurious and most ornate buildings, only the wealthy and elite will ever be able to entertain themselves.
Its perfectly fine and acceptable to expect buildings like this. Its good for the city.
In so far as my opinions on UP, that forum has - shall we say - issues. I'm glad I'm not there listening to it.
|
I'm sorry I helped take this kind of off topic, but I just have to say that a low budget is no excuse for a bad design. No one is demanding that every building be the Palace of Versailles, but good architecture can be done well on a budget, and it can even be mass produced. It's really kind of a false choice to draw the choices as either The Plaza or a freeway-side Motel 6. Hyatt's new default format, particulary for its Place brand, is just really sloppy/tacky architecture, and it has nothing to do with the price point of who they hired for the design (or even if it's done in-house).
People need to understand that a critique of architecture also isn't necessarily a critique or judgement on the entire benefits of a project. This thing has not ruined Nashville by any stretch of the imagination, but people should be able to make a critique of the design without it being conflated to a mass judgement on development in Nashville or anywhere else for that matter. One can believe that the function of this building is a net plus and positive for downtown Nashville, and still think the architeture looks like something straight out of an updated Sears' catalogue.