Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00
You shouldn't. That's not sustainable. It's an abuse of Keynesianism to deficit finance services, especially when the economy is good. Should not happen. Raise taxes and pay for what is needed or wanted.
Wynne's problem was simply that her social justice agenda was entirely about leveling lower income with the middle class. So free college under a certain income threshold while the middle class takes on student loans. On the flip side, EV rebates to $100k Tesla buyers. Why would the middle class vote for that? And of course, they didn't. Governments that focus on wide public accessibility to services always do best. It's when they stray off chasing niches with tax cuts or grants that the public eventually turns on them.
|
For sure, there's a lot on her agenda that could have been cut. Tuition should not have been free for lower income, but maybe interest free student loans with a generous window for repayment (and really, everyone should have they, because just because parents have an income considered "high" doesn't mean they can pay for tuition), electric car rebates are good, but limit that to maybe $50k (at that time). High speed rail to, what was it, London? No necessary.
That said, the current Premier came in, saw the deficit, and decided to make beer cheaper, brand Ontario license plates Conservative Blue and kill cap-and-trade that brought in a $Billion a year to the province. Later, he made license plate renewals free. He's also been fighting in courts for a whole bunch of dumb things (not having to show up at the "Freedom" convoy inquiry, limiting salary raises for nurses, the Federal carbon tax...). He's been pouring millions into private health care. Hardly a fiscally responsible Government.