HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2010, 9:58 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Austin council to vote on new $3.4M boathouse and who will run it

City has yet to decide who will run facility on north shore of Lady Bird Lake.

Quote:
By Marty Toohey

American-Statesman STAFF

Updated: 5:16 a.m. Thursday, Sept. 23, 2010


The Austin City Council will consider approving a $3.4 million boathouse on the north shore of Lady Bird Lake at its meeting today. The two-story, 10,800-square-foot building would replace an older, smaller boathouse.

The new boathouse would serve rowers, kayakers, canoers and others and include boat storage, locker rooms, an observation deck and offices for the Austin parks department. It would be located along the hike-and-bike trail near the downtown Four Seasons Hotel.

The project is part of a larger effort to beautify Waller Creek. The creek empties into Lady Bird Lake close to the existing boathouse. The new boathouse would be set farther back from the lake to accommodate a lagoon at the mouth of the creek. The renovation of Waller Creek is meant to control flooding and spur development in the southeastern part of downtown.

"This will be one of the first visible signs of the (Waller Creek) project," said Marty Stump , the city's park development coordinator. "So much of it will be underground, and this will give the public some signs of progress."

The new boathouse should be finished by December 2012 , Stump said. The city has yet to decide who would run the facility. The nonprofit Austin Rowing Club, which has operated the existing boathouse for more than two decades, has submitted a bid to run the new boathouse, as has the Texas Rowing Center, a business that operates on the shore behind Austin High School.
http://www.statesman.com/news/local/...4m-932703.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2010, 12:15 AM
austin242 austin242 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 591
Just a side thought here, but I always thought that they should turn the Pump station at seaholm into a boathouse. What are they doing with it anyway?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2010, 1:42 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by austin242 View Post
Just a side thought here, but I always thought that they should turn the Pump station at seaholm into a boathouse. What are they doing with it anyway?
Don't recall ever hearing any plans?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2010, 1:51 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
It's curious, how no one is up in arms about a $3.4 project that serves just a few people (maybe 1000 per week) from the hours of 5-9 during the summer, and very sporadically during the rest of the year.....


While a 13M boardwalk to complete the trail has the whole city up in arms. This project would serve easily 30,000 people, 7am-9pm every day of the year.

Lets do the quick math:

Boat house:

Operational 5 hours day, 5 days a week - 25 hours a week for 52 weeks= 1300 hours per year. This is being very generous. 1300*1000 = 1.3M person hours.

3.4M/1.3M = $2.62 per person hour

vs

Boardwalk:

Operations 14 hrs per day, 7 days a week for 52 weeks = 5096 hours per year * 30K people = 153M person hours.

13M/153M = .09 per person hour

The boat house is 2.62/.09 = 29 times more expensive.........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2010, 2:33 PM
NAL's Avatar
NAL NAL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5
Yes, but ...

The city will get "concession fees" from whomever is chosen to run the boathouse, as noted in the linked article. The Austin Rowing Club may have to raise its member's fees to pay the concession, which seems fair for their limited use of city property.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2010, 11:51 AM
SecretAgentMan's Avatar
SecretAgentMan SecretAgentMan is offline
CIA since 2003
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 346
I think the controversy comes from using a transportation bond to pay for an expensive facility that people won't get to drive their cars on. The boathouse will be paid for by the Waller Creek TIF, which is money that would not exist if not for the Waller Creek Tunnel. Construction of the tunnel is what necessitates demolition of the existing boathouse, so it is only fair.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2010, 2:26 PM
Armybrat Armybrat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 656
I thought the city was facing a shortfall?

http://www.myfoxaustin.com/dpp/top_s...20100608-ktbcw

Are property taxes going to increase?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2010, 6:09 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: there and back again
Posts: 57,324
The boardwalk will be used for transportation. I don't know how many times I've ridden the hike & bike trail to avoid the summer heat instead of taking the streets. It's nice too to use it to avoid traffic. It's sort of like walking the Riverwalk in San Antonio to be away from cars instead of using the street. Sometimes it's nice to avoid them.
__________________
Donate to Donald Trump's campaign today!

Thou shall not indict
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2010, 3:46 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armybrat View Post
I thought the city was facing a shortfall?

http://www.myfoxaustin.com/dpp/top_s...20100608-ktbcw

Are property taxes going to increase?
Of course. They already have. The Waller Creek TIF place holder is already showing up on our tax bills. School tax rates are going up everywhere. Business tax rates are also going up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2010, 4:14 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretAgentMan View Post
I think the controversy comes from using a transportation bond to pay for an expensive facility that people won't get to drive their cars on. The boathouse will be paid for by the Waller Creek TIF, which is money that would not exist if not for the Waller Creek Tunnel. Construction of the tunnel is what necessitates demolition of the existing boathouse, so it is only fair.
Or, more accurately, the money wouldn't exist w/o the TIF. I wouldn't say 3.4M structure is exactly an even trade-off for what is there now. It looks like those structures could be rebuilt for less than 1M. The original estimates were 1.7M, so its now doubled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAL View Post
Yes, but ... The city will get "concession fees" from whomever is chosen to run the boathouse, as noted in the linked article. The Austin Rowing Club may have to raise its member's fees to pay the concession, which seems fair for their limited use of city property.
I was curious exactly what the concession fees were, and ran across some other info. According to the Statesman, the club currently has 400 members, so I was WAY off on the WAG above. If they gross 400K per year, then concession fees could be 10%??? 40K per year???? Interest on 3.4M is 14K per month, or over 168K per year, so the concession fees are not going to pay for that.

http://www.statesman.com/news/conten...103rowing.html

http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/parks/concessions.htm

The numbers just don't add up, when you compare it to the boardwalk.

I'm not super crazy about what looks to be a view blocking design, unless they welcome the public to sit on the upper deck.

Current structure:


[New rendering]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2012, 11:38 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Making progress !










Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2012, 2:51 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,735
People need to get it through their head that walking on their own feet is a means of transportation. Im tired of this car centric society where if its not more highways, its bigger roads ect...
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2012, 8:48 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Rowing club might run new, $3.4 million city boathouse

Quote:

A rowing club that for decades has run a city boathouse on Lady Bird Lake might operate the new $3.4 million boathouse that's replacing it, even though the group ranked second in the contract bidding process.

Austin's parks board voted 4-2 this week to urge the City Council not to hire the rowing club, saying the nonprofit doesn't have the experience or financial strength to manage the new boathouse and offer a greater array of services.

"They do not have a viable business plan or a clear pro forma that indicates they can run a profitable business from this new, $3.4 million facility," parks board member Hill Abell said Wednesday .

The new boathouse is under construction on the lake's north shore, near the Four Seasons hotel. It is nearly complete and will open this month or next .
Quote:
Texas Rowing Center , a business that runs a city boathouse near Austin High School, offered to pay the city $1.5 million over seven years, $300,000 more than the club. Partly for that reason, the center scored higher during the bidding process: 113.5 out of a possible 125 points, compared with the club's 106.4 points.

But the rowing center was disqualified last year for a lobbying violation.
http://www.statesman.com/news/local/...n-2208337.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2012, 9:16 PM
Slappy Slappy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
People need to get it through their head that walking on their own feet is a means of transportation. Im tired of this car centric society where if its not more highways, its bigger roads ect...
Damn Straight!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2012, 1:56 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slappy View Post
Damn Straight!
Im glad you agree, I would rather travel on foot through the trails than to deal with the traffic any day, you can cross from West Austin to East Austin within an hours time and you can connect to trails that go through the West End along Shoal creek, as well as Waller creek though I would rather wait till they are done with the tunnel and fix the area up first. You can walk from Downtown all the way out to the Southwest part of the city on foot now. Technically you can walk from Downtown to Barton Creek Mall on foot though you would need to deal with the Mopac/360 intersection and a quarter mile stretch of road to get there. I think if they created paths and better pedestrian crossings like a bridge that could be done.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2012, 7:23 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: there and back again
Posts: 57,324
5/28



It's mighty close to the trail. Look both ways before stepping off those stairs!




Bike racks!


Deck area.




__________________
Donate to Donald Trump's campaign today!

Thou shall not indict
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2012, 5:23 PM
nixcity's Avatar
nixcity nixcity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, TX.
Posts: 768
Looks nice but wasnt the main reason for doing this to make it bigger??? It certainly doesnt appear to be much larger than what was there before, is sure does look better though!
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:50 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.