https://www.bostonglobe.com/business...t8K/story.html
And before that it was 750 feet:
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/n...are-tower.html
This will not be changed until it's actually nailed down. At the moment, it's 702 feet, but even before that they were talking about 775 feet and 750 feet, never 758 feet. I think it was you I went over this before with concerning using the FAA applications as a source. After discussing it with you I went and did some random research on my state and found multiple applications where the information was incorrect to what has actually been built.
So, with that said, I'm not going to accept the FAA applications as a primary source when a height already exists in the database. I'll accept it as a primary source should not other height exist in the database for a building, or if the current height in the database
clearly be in error. But in any other case, you'll have to have corroborating evidence. I'd suggest, then, to save corrections and such until you have done this.