HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 2:45 AM
FuzzyWuz FuzzyWuz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 350
Dysfunctional Halifax Intersections

I don't know if this warrants a thread of it's own but I thought I'd take a stab at it.

I'm thinking tonight of the lights at the Dartmouth side of the Macdonald bridge. As you leave the tollbooth there is a left turn lane; There are two lanes going up Nantucket for regular traffic, and there's a bus lane. I see, time and time again, someone entering the intersection in the left lane going up Nantucket and heading directly to the right lane to exit the intersection. No signals, no nothing. Clearly there are a lot of people who don't get that the left lane on one side lines up with the left lane on the other side of the intersection. Enough people get it wrong that I think there is a flaw in the design of the intersection/lane markings.

Any thoughts on this? Is there a fix?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 4:57 AM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyWuz View Post
I don't know if this warrants a thread of it's own but I thought I'd take a stab at it.

I'm thinking tonight of the lights at the Dartmouth side of the Macdonald bridge. As you leave the tollbooth there is a left turn lane; There are two lanes going up Nantucket for regular traffic, and there's a bus lane. I see, time and time again, someone entering the intersection in the left lane going up Nantucket and heading directly to the right lane to exit the intersection. No signals, no nothing. Clearly there are a lot of people who don't get that the left lane on one side lines up with the left lane on the other side of the intersection. Enough people get it wrong that I think there is a flaw in the design of the intersection/lane markings.

Any thoughts on this? Is there a fix?
I had to read this a few times to try to get what you were trying to demonstrate (it's late here); so I'm hoping I got this right.

The big issue you are saying is people being in the left turn only lane and going through straight up Nantucket - despite the fact it's dedicated left turn only?

Well - that could be solved through the use of a barrier (a curb or something) that slants traffic into a slight angle demonstrating a left turn - although with the limited space I'm not sure how well that would work. It might function okay considering the blvd has a landscaped area on the other side?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 5:20 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,294
Even without slanting the lane it could be done.

All of the tollbooths are seperated with a narrow curb so that could be extended right to the intersection. That would force the vehicles to turn and any people still confused could just use Boland or the Mall to get to Victoria if necessary.

The far right booth has a sign saying its for right-turns so the same could be done for this lane (left arrow) and the one to the right of it (straight arrow).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 8:54 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
I had to read this a few times to try to get what you were trying to demonstrate (it's late here); so I'm hoping I got this right.

The big issue you are saying is people being in the left turn only lane and going through straight up Nantucket - despite the fact it's dedicated left turn only?
No, I don't think that's the issue. I use this intersection every day and I have never seen someone in the left turn lane trying to go straight ahead.

What he is talking about is the leftmost straight-ahead lane. At least once a week I will be in the rightmost straight-thru lane and have some moron next to me drift towards me wanting to end up in my lane on the other side of the intersection. I have even had a few of these idiots honk at me like I have done something wrong.

This is a bad spot in so many ways. Even before the tolls you have a scramble as drivers dart willy-nilly towards whatever tollgate they want in spite of what lane they are in crossing the bridge. Then you have the described behavior going through the intersection, and then you have 2 absolutely lethal crosswalks on Nantucket that both tie up traffic and are tremendously dangerous to pedestrians. The whole thing needs to be blown up and redesigned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2010, 3:20 AM
hfx_chris hfx_chris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
What he is talking about is the leftmost straight-ahead lane. At least once a week I will be in the rightmost straight-thru lane and have some moron next to me drift towards me wanting to end up in my lane on the other side of the intersection. I have even had a few of these idiots honk at me like I have done something wrong.
I see that happen so often. People are dense.
I think the best way to resolve that would be for the city to paint thin dashed lines indicating that the two lanes go straight. Other intersections have thin dashed lines to indicate where you're supposed to drive if it's a little confusing, obviously this is too much for some of our genius drivers in Halifax to figure out too
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2010, 5:42 AM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
No, I don't think that's the issue. I use this intersection every day and I have never seen someone in the left turn lane trying to go straight ahead.

What he is talking about is the leftmost straight-ahead lane. At least once a week I will be in the rightmost straight-thru lane and have some moron next to me drift towards me wanting to end up in my lane on the other side of the intersection. I have even had a few of these idiots honk at me like I have done something wrong.

This is a bad spot in so many ways. Even before the tolls you have a scramble as drivers dart willy-nilly towards whatever tollgate they want in spite of what lane they are in crossing the bridge. Then you have the described behavior going through the intersection, and then you have 2 absolutely lethal crosswalks on Nantucket that both tie up traffic and are tremendously dangerous to pedestrians. The whole thing needs to be blown up and redesigned.
They need to get rid of the crosswalks and put an elevated walkway over the whole roadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2010, 1:05 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian View Post
They need to get rid of the crosswalks and put an elevated walkway over the whole roadway.
Actually, what they really need to do is elevate the roadway so traffic can go upstairs (essentially above the existing 1950s-era tollgates) and avoid the Wyse Rd intersection entirely if they are using Nantucket in either direction. Keep the at-grade part only if you are going left or right to/from the bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2010, 1:09 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
One of the other favorite dysfunctional intersections is where Chebucto turns into Cunard at Windsor. As you are heading east on Chebucto, when you hit Windsor you are faced with buildings dead ahead at the intersection. If you want to continue eastbound you have to jog to the right and then go back left. Of course, if you are attempting to make a turn onto Windsor, hilarity ensues.

But wait, there's more...

If you are on Windsor at this intersection there are allegedly 2 lanes in either direction. However, the street is too narrow to support that many lanes, and in any event, they are not marked once you get into the intersection. What happens more often than not is that cars attempting to turn left go nose to nose with those doing the same thing in the other direction. Totally ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2010, 1:54 PM
hfx_chris hfx_chris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 1,450
Yup yup, forgot about Windsor and Chebucto/Cunard. I hate that intersection, and I usually try to avoid it. They should demolish the convenience store there and straighten the intersection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2010, 11:06 AM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfx_chris View Post
Yup yup, forgot about Windsor and Chebucto/Cunard. I hate that intersection, and I usually try to avoid it. They should demolish the convenience store there and straighten the intersection.
I drive this one on a daily basis in all directions. Yes I hate it too. However it wouldn't be as bad if everyone who used it understood how it worked. Explaining that would take a hell of a lot longer than taking down the Needs and re-aligning the intersection. So Chris I agree with you. The Needs doesn't even have to go. The wasted non-used parking front can go and that would make a big difference.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2012, 4:23 AM
FuzzyWuz FuzzyWuz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 350
Once again last night I was leaving the old bridge about to drive up Nantucket Avenue when the driver to my left showed ignorance of which lane he was following through the intersection. This time it was the other driver who honked as I kept to my lane. After jumping almost out of my skin I realized he thought I was the one cutting into a lane. Nope. When one driver does this one time then it's all their fault. When it happens many times a week at the same intersection there's a problem with the intersection. It then occurred to me: Why don't they put a rumble strip between the two up-Nantucket lanes just where they cross that intersection? That would make someone aware right away that they were crossing lanes. And the traffic going the other way would not even notice.

Last edited by FuzzyWuz; Jul 21, 2012 at 4:24 AM. Reason: clarity
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2012, 2:04 PM
Waye Mason's Avatar
Waye Mason Waye Mason is offline
opinionated so and so
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 721
The right most lane coming out of the Dartmouth bound tolls is a bus lane, or a bus and turn into Scotiabank lane. It could be removed when the bus terminal moves up hill.

The crosswalk light has been replaced with a red light configuration, I'd like to see the crosswalk removed and an intersection put in with lights four ways, synced to the bridge. A bit cheaper than an overpass! They will need new traffic signalling for the bus terminal anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2012, 7:02 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waye Mason View Post
The right most lane coming out of the Dartmouth bound tolls is a bus lane, or a bus and turn into Scotiabank lane. It could be removed when the bus terminal moves up hill.

The crosswalk light has been replaced with a red light configuration, I'd like to see the crosswalk removed and an intersection put in with lights four ways, synced to the bridge. A bit cheaper than an overpass! They will need new traffic signalling for the bus terminal anyway.
It would not be much different than what is there now given there is a red light that is controlled by pedestrians. There is minimal vehicular traffic crossing Nantucket so a full intersection would do little to assist. I doubt buses are heading out of the terminal and then going uphill on Nantucket.

I wonder if anyone at HRM actually thought about this thing before building the new gold-plated mega terminal? It would have made sense to extend the 3rd lane going uphill from the bridge to the terminal entrance on Nantucket and take advantage of what is there already. Of course this did not happen.

If the Bridge Commission ever decides that the existing 1955 East Germany toll plaza needs to go, the entire thing needs to be re-thought. While they are re-decking the bridge it would make so much sense to also do a grade-separated solution to the Wyse Rd intersection that backs traffic up horribly onto the bridge. Let traffic going to Nantucket go overhead and avoid Wyse entirely. Do the same for traffic turning left onto Wyse. But noooo....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2012, 10:50 PM
Spire Spire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
Long time lurker here, finally joining!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
I doubt buses are heading out of the terminal and then going uphill on Nantucket.
When the new terminal opens, the 10, 16, and 87 will be rerouted - exiting the terminal and going uphill on Nantucket, and turning left on Victoria.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
It would have made sense to extend the 3rd lane going uphill from the bridge to the terminal entrance on Nantucket and take advantage of what is there already. Of course this did not happen.
Actually, that is exactly what is happening. They've already relocated the utility poles and laid the gravel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2012, 3:53 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
Long time lurker here, finally joining!



When the new terminal opens, the 10, 16, and 87 will be rerouted - exiting the terminal and going uphill on Nantucket, and turning left on Victoria.



Actually, that is exactly what is happening. They've already relocated the utility poles and laid the gravel.
Firstly welcome to the forum

Secondly, the 16 will actually remain on its current route. The new split will be 52/53 Highfield /64 (Wyse-Albro Lake), 16 (Wyse-Boland-Victoria), 87/10 Westphal (Nantucket-Victoria), and the 10 Dalhousie/53 Bridge (Victoria-Thistle). There will still be three buses turning right at the lights but it will be the 10, 87, and 320.

Thirdly, Yes it appears you are correct. They are also doing work on the kitty corner at this intersection. If I get the chance I will grab some photos in the morning.
__________________
NEW!!!Halifax Developments Blog

- DJ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2012, 4:08 AM
Spire Spire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
Secondly, the 16 will actually remain on its current route. The new split will be 52/53 Highfield /64 (Wyse-Albro Lake), 16 (Wyse-Boland-Victoria), 87/10 Westphal (Nantucket-Victoria), and the 10 Dalhousie/53 Bridge (Victoria-Thistle). There will still be three buses turning right at the lights but it will be the 10, 87, and 320.
Ah, thanks for the correction. I find it curious that they'd keep the 16 on the Boland routing when they're rerouting the other routes on that corridor. It really isn't that far a walk to Victoria or the terminal from there...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2012, 7:50 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,294
The new lane (Urban_Halifax @ Flickr)

__________________
NEW!!!Halifax Developments Blog

- DJ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2012, 11:32 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,294
There's been some talk about diverging diamond interchanges on the national highways thread and after looking them up I think they are onto something. Basically in these interchanges it follows a standard diamond interchange pattern but the intersecting road reverses flow on the overpass. It sounds crazy but with good design it works extremely well for interchanges with high numbers of left-turns.

Article about one in Montana

Video Link


Currently only Halifax would require innovative thinking like this in Nova Scotia. NSTIR currently operates ~12 diamond interchanges in Greater HRM. Of these one has a split three-way approach (Larry Uteck), one has roundabouts (Margeson), two have one-way approach (Wright Ave, Aerotech), one is planned to become a highway interchange (Glendale), and five don't have enough traffic flow to warrant this solution initially.

This leaves Burnside Drive and Lacewood as the possible candidates for this design. Both currently suffer from horrendous traffic jams and both have serious issues relating to left-turns. Burnside Drive might be too cramped for this because of the 90 degree turn onto Highfield Drive however IMO this would be great for Lacewood. Throw in some bicycle lanes and proper sidewalk infrastructure and the notorious Christmas traffic jams will disappear overnight.

IMO NSTIR should use a mix of diverging diamond, standard diamond, roundabouts, parclos, and whatever 111/118 is in their interchange designs around Halifax. They can even evolve in that order (provided space is available).
__________________
NEW!!!Halifax Developments Blog

- DJ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2012, 12:16 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
Certainly seems superior to the current flavor-of-the-month roundabout. The bike lanes are of course unnecessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2012, 5:21 AM
Aya_Akai's Avatar
Aya_Akai Aya_Akai is offline
Dartmouth Girl
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
Certainly seems superior to the current flavor-of-the-month roundabout. The bike lanes are of course unnecessary.


This forum needs an over-sized emoticon/smiley for a decent *facepalm*
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:23 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.