HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: What is the best location for an expandable stadium in Halifax?
Dartmouth Crossing 34 38.20%
Shannon Park 31 34.83%
SMU 6 6.74%
Airport 2 2.25%
Other 16 17.98%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2011, 9:13 PM
q12's Avatar
q12 q12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 4,500
Just did a check today and over the last couple of days of afternoon temperatures around HRM with Environment Canada and Nova Scotia Transportation and Infrastructure renewal cameras http://www.gov.ns.ca/tran/cameras/.

The Portabello station was up to 25 degrees celcius today which was the hottest I could find around and is only 2 miles north of the Dartmouth Crossing Quarry.


I think if the Dartmouth Crossing site is chosen that it will always be a plus that it has a warm climate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2011, 10:20 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by q12 View Post
I think if the Dartmouth Crossing site is chosen that it will always be a plus that it has a warm climate.
Then people will be able to complain, "It's TOO HOT !!!!!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 3:22 AM
resetcbu1's Avatar
resetcbu1 resetcbu1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
I hate to be negative ...... but I really don't think any site outside of the urban core will be a success and I grew up my whole life in dartmouth. Does anyone here remember a minor pro soccer team based in dartmouth???? If no that is most likely because you never crossed the water to see them play(or were too young) or when the halifax exports breifly moved accross the bay also not a success.........And what about the Montreal Expos(my favorite team) part of their demisse was the fact they couldn't get a stadium closer to the downtown and good transit and soon moved to washington.

I think for the first little bit a stadium anywhere in HRM would draw, but after the novelty wore off people will become more reluctant to travel further out to the "burbs" to see events. This has happened more than a few times through-out North America I assume.

I hope to see a stadium built, and any step in that direction is great, it is just my opinion that for long term sustainability it needs to be a central locale.

my vote : other
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 4:37 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by resetcbu1 View Post
I think for the first little bit a stadium anywhere in HRM would draw, but after the novelty wore off people will become more reluctant to travel further out to the "burbs" to see events. This has happened more than a few times through-out North America I assume.
I agree. I think it is yet another decision based on short term concerns (save a few million dollars, perhaps avoid upsetting some NIMBYs) that could end up being less than ideal. A suburban location might not be a disaster but it won't have the same atmosphere and it won't build on existing attractions the way a more central stadium would. The best cities have lots of amenities concentrated in a small area. Halifax is so small that if it gets too spread out it really won't have much to offer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 6:04 AM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I agree. I think it is yet another decision based on short term concerns (save a few million dollars, perhaps avoid upsetting some NIMBYs) that could end up being less than ideal. A suburban location might not be a disaster but it won't have the same atmosphere and it won't build on existing attractions the way a more central stadium would. The best cities have lots of amenities concentrated in a small area. Halifax is so small that if it gets too spread out it really won't have much to offer.
I strongly agree as well.

I'm becoming very nervous that a location in the suburbs will be chosen--and we will lose all developmental spin-offs since the FIXED density in such an area is far, far too low.

All those one-floor box stores; all those parking lots...

No walking traffic, even from Dartmouth suburbian residents.

Vehicle-access only.

People are kidding themselves if they think that piss-poor towns, such as Truro (15,000 people), are going to strongly aid in the regular attendance of this stadium.

And does absolutely anyone here truly believe that HRM would fork over even MORE funds to improve DC's transit, in order to further guarantee that people from the peninsula and Halifax West would regularly attend?

... I think it's safe to say: ha. no.

Something to consider: people often think of Moncton as a sprawled mess--but even Moncton put their stadium in Moncton. Their stadium is located so that it is fed by UdeM students and the immediate surrounding residential areas.

Halifax has so many universities that would constantly feed a new stadium. WHHHhyyyyy aren't we using this over-looked resource?!?!?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 10:45 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 67,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by resetcbu1 View Post
And what about the Montreal Expos(my favorite team) part of their demisse was the fact they couldn't get a stadium closer to the downtown and good transit and soon moved to washington.
Stadium location for the Expos was a problem but Olympic Stadium actually has pretty good transit with two métro stations serving it. Never had a problem getting in and out of there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 10:48 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Here is a link to a Shannon Park Street View image - Google Street View. I think that the church in the image is one that DND has put tenders out to demolish. Does anyone know the situation for the adjacent school (is closing it being considered?). It appears to me that a sheltered location could be found in this area (or artificially make it sheltered with dirt berms and trees).

Since I have recently been to the Toronto Rogers Centre and Toronto BMO Field, I can make the following observations:
1) The Rogers Centre has all public transit options and is probably the best location from the public transit perspective, but it is not a pleasant place to drive a car to (being in downtown Toronto, driving is nerve-wrecking).
2) BMO Field has lots of adjacent parking spaces and is much easier to drive to (it is directly adjacent to the Lakeshore Blvd which is easily accessed from The Gardiner Expressway). It also has very good public transit options, although not as good as the Rogers Centre).

From a vehicular transit perspective, the BMO Field location is much better. It is also in a central location and has good public transit. It is somewhat analogous to Shannon Park, in my opinion (the possibility of plentiful parking spaces, a fairly easy drive, good public transit, and relatively close to the central core).

Also since Shannon Park is currently quite desolate and run down, a very economical stadium could be put there without being overly concerned with the stadium appearance. It could be built quickly and cheaply.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 12:21 PM
reddog794's Avatar
reddog794 reddog794 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 198
As much as Wanderers Grounds is the most ideal location, IMO. The Forum lands would be just as opportune. The area is on a hill, so a sunken bowl design would fit, as well as being within striking distance to the MacKay, Bayers Rd. and still a 20 min walk from the edge of DT.

Is the whole block city owned?

DC, is not a very good option. The car-mall, which is what it is because it deffinately is not for people, will just be a frustrating event getting out. It will as bad as getting out of a Senetors game. We waited on average almost 30 mins just to get out of the parking lot in the shuttles.

The 'burbs won't cut it, and with the Province, and councillors talking about the business case, imagine then how much a brand new ferry terminal would cost for Shannon park, not to mention remediation.

We are a pretty compact city, so we need to start thinking like other cities with the same advantages our size brings.
__________________
We may smile at these matters, but they are melancholy illustrations. - Joe Howe

go dogs go!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 1:34 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 34,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeJay View Post
People are kidding themselves if they think that piss-poor towns, such as Truro (15,000 people), are going to strongly aid in the regular attendance of this stadium.
I think residents of Truro would take umbrage to the characterization of their town as piss-poor. Also, the CA population of Truro is listed as being around 45,000.

Another thing, you shouldn't discount out of town support for any potential Halifax based CFL team. It goes back to the argument about whether it is going to be a Halifax team or a Maritime franchise. This is an important point.... I would think you would want to encourage regional support and make the unwashed from elsewhere in the Maritimes feel welcomed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeJay View Post
Something to consider: people often think of Moncton as a sprawled mess--but even Moncton put their stadium in Moncton. Their stadium is located so that it is fed by UdeM students and the immediate surrounding residential areas.
The Moncton Stadium is not really downtown. It's north of Hall's Creek on the U de M campus, which makes it out-of-the-way as far as I'm concerned. Parking is a very large issue with our stadium and they have to use shuttle busses for special events like the upcoming CFL game. The fact that the stadium is on the university campus is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 2:38 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I agree. I think it is yet another decision based on short term concerns (save a few million dollars, perhaps avoid upsetting some NIMBYs) that could end up being less than ideal. A suburban location might not be a disaster but it won't have the same atmosphere and it won't build on existing attractions the way a more central stadium would. The best cities have lots of amenities concentrated in a small area. Halifax is so small that if it gets too spread out it really won't have much to offer.
This sums up my concern pretty well. Yes, there may be some restaurants near by the DC site - but would you really feel safe crossing a 6 lane street to get to them?

If you think about how you would get people to and from the site - the savings in cost will be minimal mainly because of the road and infrastructure improvements necessary. At minimum I'd suggest a pedestrian bridge over that wonderful 6 lane roadway into DC so pedestrians that want to actually go to the restaurants in DC aren't taking their lives in their own hands.

The idea that I had was that a small area of land beside the stadium could be rezoned for restaurants, thus it wouldn't be so far to go. But I don't think anyone seems to be thinking beyond the cost of the stadium. Yes, the structure will cost whatever it does, but what about the road system - has that been factored in?

It would be no different though for Shannon. A re-work of the road system would be required and you'd still have the same problem of little to no restaurants near by either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 6:39 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,673
Quote:
This sums up my concern pretty well. Yes, there may be some restaurants near by the DC site - but would you really feel safe crossing a 6 lane street to get to them?
Yep, there's probably a shitty Boston Pizza or whatever that you'll have to spend 30 minutes getting to because the area will be gridlocked post-game despite claims that a location next to a highway solves the traffic problem.

One big company has a monopoly on the land nearby and tends to sell it off to bland national or multinational companies with no particular attachment to Halifax. The area will be devoid of culture or interest for the foreseeable future and will be discarded whenever it's deemed marginally unprofitable by somebody in Toronto or wherever, which is probably going to happen if gas prices double or triple (again).

Quote:
At minimum I'd suggest a pedestrian bridge over that wonderful 6 lane roadway into DC so pedestrians that want to actually go to the restaurants in DC aren't taking their lives in their own hands.
This is the most palatable solution and yet it results in a slog of hundreds of meters through one of the least interesting environments imaginable. Meanwhile within similar distances downtown there's way more of everything, including parking spots and traffic lanes.

Quote:
It would be no different though for Shannon. A re-work of the road system would be required and you'd still have the same problem of little to no restaurants near by either.
I don't like Shannon much either. A ferry at least could work there and would be kind of interesting, though in practice that might be bungled by the city. Mostly I like the idea of Shannon Park because it's not way out in the suburbs. I'd prefer a location around the Commons, maybe something by the Seawall, around Young Street, or on that big field by Robie Street/SMU. I think it would be better to wait a few years for a stadium on a good location than to put out in a marginal suburban location for the sake of FIFA.

The only consolation here I guess is that I don't really care about the stadium itself that much. And I live in a city that correctly built a stadium downtown right next to rapid transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 7:11 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Each site presents interesting challenges and opportunities.

DC presents the challenge of the access road system and servicing event participants by transit and for entertainment. Getting across that 6 lane road is the first major issue, then there is getting some commercial near by the stadium and a road design that isn't a parking lot during events or a challenge for people going to DC for the shops versus stadium events. I don't see transit for a DC stadium (or even another site) as being so much of a challenge mainly because you could establish a series of BRTs from different locations that have 1 or 2 stops before going straight to the stadium. That's fine and could be included in the event ticket - good pre-planning on the part of any team.

Shannon would be a whole new ball game in the sense that not only could you build a stadium but you could build a whole new community, from the ground up. So not only would you need to deal with road access and getting over the railway crossing - but also sewage capacity, storm water run off, design of the roads system and what kind of community would you have (mixed use, high density residential, etc.). Transit would be a different challenge because not only would you need to think about a road system, but you have the opportunity of a high speed ferry link (which obvious DC doesn't). The opportunity for SP is greater (in my mind) because even with a stadium, you could promote the use of the parking areas as a transit station during the weekdays, when nothing typically happens at the stadium. I can't quite see the same concept for DC when you have Mic Mac station so close by. But that might change if DC gets a stadium because I read that there was some discussion of moving the Burnside Bus station to this location, so then it might be workable to move the whole thing here?

I have to admit I haven't read the articles about the bids - what are the other two locations that came up?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 8:23 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
I think residents of Truro would take umbrage to the characterization of their town as piss-poor.
And?..

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Also, the CA population of Truro is listed as being around 45,000.
No. 45,000 is out of context. We are talking about the town of Truro--not the surrounding villages--and certainly not the virtual total of Colchester County.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Another thing, you shouldn't discount out of town support for any potential Halifax based CFL team. It goes back to the argument about whether it is going to be a Halifax team or a Maritime franchise. This is an important point.... I would think you would want to encourage regional support and make the unwashed from elsewhere in the Maritimes feel welcomed.
I'm not discounting. I'm taking regular attendance into consideration. Placing a stadium in a suburb of Halifax vs. the peninsula is not going to affect out-of-Halifax visitors. If they are going to drive for a couple hours, they will drive all the way to the peninsula. This is an argument about the ease of access for the stadium's most likely attendees and economic beneficiaries: Haligonians.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
The Moncton Stadium is not really downtown. It's north of Hall's Creek on the U de M campus, which makes it out-of-the-way as far as I'm concerned. Parking is a very large issue with our stadium and they have to use shuttle busses for special events like the upcoming CFL game. The fact that the stadium is on the university campus is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
Irrelevant!? You don't believe a CFL stadium appeals to a younger audience the most? That's absurd. Or maybe SMU is just being silly...

And since when is UdeM considered to be in the Moncton suburbs? The campus is a 20 walk to the city's downtown (though, not a pleasant walk since many of the roads don't have suitable sidewalks).

I don't even think Halifax would build a CFL stadium downtown -- but Moncton has at least provided some economic certainty for their stadium with its placement. And to be realistic, even if Moncton built a stadium in its downtown there would still be challenges since the entire municipality is a prime example of sprawl. Density is nearly non-existent. It does not have a walkable downtown like Halifax does. A clear example of this is in how Dieppe just installed sidewalks in one of its busiest area: Paul Street; Champlain Place/Mall.

Moncton is vehicle first, walking second--so of course they have to shuttle people to their stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 10:24 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,964
The mention of a potential ferry for a Shannon stadium always makes me shake my head. Where would the ferry take you? I can think of only 3 possible destinations: downtown Halifax, Woodside, or Bedford, if a terminal is built. So you would take a ferry to either a place where nobody lives, or to a place where you parked your car. And each ride could only carry a couple of hundred people. Hardly seems useful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 10:59 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
The mention of a potential ferry for a Shannon stadium always makes me shake my head. Where would the ferry take you? I can think of only 3 possible destinations: downtown Halifax, Woodside, or Bedford, if a terminal is built. So you would take a ferry to either a place where nobody lives, or to a place where you parked your car. And each ride could only carry a couple of hundred people. Hardly seems useful.
Well when I talk about a ferry from SP; I'm talking in a broader sense of not just for the stadium. The regional plan identified SP as a opportunity site and there was policy in the RP that talked about redeveloping SP to be mixed use and that transportation connections to the downtown should be considered. That's how Metro Transit ended up with the idea of a ferry from there and put it into their plans. The whole point of SP (from what I understand) was for it to be a transit oriented development site; high density close to transit (ferry).

Even if a stadium doesn't go in SP; I'd still want to see a ferry because people who live and work downtown may choose to live there. If enough high speed ferries get built with the HS ferry idea - you could have multiple routes from SP to dt Halifax or Bedford.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2011, 11:27 PM
Welkin Welkin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 396
I hate to be negative ...... but I really don't think any site outside of the urban core will be a success and I grew up my whole life in dartmouth. Does anyone here remember a minor pro soccer team based in dartmouth???? If no that is most likely because you never crossed the water to see them play(or were too young) or when the halifax exports breifly moved accross the bay also not a success.........And what about the Montreal Expos(my favorite team) part of their demisse was the fact they couldn't get a stadium closer to the downtown and good transit and soon moved to washington.

I think for the first little bit a stadium anywhere in HRM would draw, but after the novelty wore off people will become more reluctant to travel further out to the "burbs" to see events. This has happened more than a few times through-out North America I assume.


Baseball stadiums and sports arenas work best in downtown locations because of their multiple events. However, football stadiums tend to work just as well in downtown or suburban locations. There are quite a few NFL stadiums quite a good distance from downtown as well as several that are right downtown. Football games tend to be on the weekends, so you don't have a lot of fans walking over to the ballpark after work. I can't believe that several of you all are whining about having to drive over from Halifax to Dartmouth for a CFL game. Talk about being spoiled. I am sure that we will have fans that will drive a couple of hours to watch a game. It comes down to the fact that this stadium will be successful regardless of where in HRM we locate the stadium. World Cup matches and CFL games are events that people will make an effort to attend. If we are not willing to drive across the MacDonald Bridge to see our CFL team play, then we don't deserve a CFL team.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2011, 1:29 AM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,059
If the event at the stadium is a big enough attraction you will have no problem filling seats. DC or SP locations would no doubt have transit hubs feeding the stadium just like the concerts on the commons did. Most people at Moosehead games come from the burbs and go through the headache of parking downtown so to go to DC or SP wouldn't be a huge inconvenience.

Look at the Magnetic Hill concert site and how out of the way it is with no amenities around it. There never seems to be a problem getting crowds to the site even if they have to wait an hour to get out of a parking lot.
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2011, 11:05 AM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
I can't believe that several of you all are whining about having to drive over from Halifax to Dartmouth for a CFL game. Talk about being spoiled.
Yes--you're quite right. The peninsula, particularly downtown, has been sooo spoiled with sooo much construction over the past decade.

*sigh*

Dude, I don't even enjoy football. This discussion is about the best economic choice. A stadium will monetarily influence its immediate surroundings. That's all this is about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
It comes down to the fact that this stadium will be successful regardless of where in HRM we locate the stadium.
Says you...

Just because you use the word 'fact' doesn't make it so. Give me proof; give me numbers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2011, 12:19 PM
Welkin Welkin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 396
Dude, I don't even enjoy football. This discussion is about the best economic choice. A stadium will monetarily influence its immediate surroundings. That's all this is about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
It comes down to the fact that this stadium will be successful regardless of where in HRM we locate the stadium.
Says you...

Just because you use the word 'fact' doesn't make it so. Give me proof; give me numbers.

I hate to spoil your bubble, but there is very little evidence that football stadiums produce any real extra monetary benefit to their surroundings. Football stadiums tend to become economic dead-zones except for the one day every other week when a game is held. Baseball stadiums have been documented to revive downtown areas (you can build businesses around 80+ games per year, but it is hard to sustain any business growth from 9+ games per year), but I am unaware of any football stadium having the same effect.
Football stadiums might bring extra business to already existing bars and restaurants, but they aren't the catalyst that causes new businesses to be developed.

I stand by my statement that location is not the major factor to success in building a football stadium. While there are multiple examples of baseball stadiums that have dramatically improved attendance with a new downtown location (at least the Florida Marlins hope this will be true), I could find no example of a professional football team that improved attendance with moving to a downtown location. The Washington Redskins moved from downtown D.C. (where they had great public transportation access) to suburban Maryland (where they limited public transportation access) and yet they still sell-out a 95,000 seat stadium. Fans in New York City drive all the way out to the New Jersey suburbs to Giants Stadium (where they have almost no public transportation access) to watch sold-out games by the NFL Giants and Jets. I don't think you would have the same sold-out results if you moved the Yankees to New Jersey suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2011, 12:42 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welkin View Post
I can't believe that several of you all are whining about having to drive over from Halifax to Dartmouth for a CFL game. Talk about being spoiled. I am sure that we will have fans that will drive a couple of hours to watch a game.
I can't speak for everyone but I don't think it's about the drive itself. It's about the fact that some of the locations don't have the infrastructure to handle the mass amounts of entering/exiting traffic that would occur. This would be true for vehicle and pedestrian/ferry traffic. No one likes sitting idle on a road for long periods of time, that's fact. Halifax isn't going to build a new highway for a stadium. If the traffic didn't affect the normal flow of city traffic than it wouldn't be as noticed but few of the peninsula roads and definitely not the bridges are able to handle a mass load. I think Scotiabank Place has been mentioned a few times. I know that it doesn't sit next to a major highway and so traffic back-ups occur. The only help is that it's not in downtown Ottawa so city traffic isn't affected as much until people that actually live there return home.

I'll close by saying this though. Halifax has the smallest traffic issue of any of the medium to large cities I have ever travelled to. I for one will sit in traffic if it meant that I could see Halifax play my current favorite Toronto Argonauts. No matter what side the harbour the stadium is on.
__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:44 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.