HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2017, 8:04 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by llamaorama View Post
I guess I must be hopelessly middle class because I like a mix of chains and local places. Some chains are useful or good(there's probably a reason why they grew), while I of course always like interesting local places too. Having a few chain stores might be a sign a neighborhood is healthy, because national companies are willing to take a chance on it. Having too many chains on the other hand suggests a lack of entrepreneurial opportunity.

It depends on the types of chains, too. There's the stalwarts, like CVS, Starbucks, etc, there upscale ones that suggest wealth, like the Gap, low end ones that suggest poverty like Ross Dress for Less, etc.

You have to ask why a chain got so popular to begin with. Case in point, Starbucks is actually pretty satisfactory in regions where indie coffee shops were not common before, like say, small town Texas. People liked it enough that it expanded to meet demand.

The chains I don't like are the "brand portfolio" restaurant type places that were invented in a boardroom, had money thrown at them, and owned by some private equity firm subsidiary with a goofy name like "AlteriX Dining Dynamics". The ones that back in the 1990's would have rusty tubas on the dining room walls for "flair". You know exactly what places I am talking about.
I can't relate. As a matter of preference, I can't stand chains with the exception of CVS\Walgreens and Home Depot. For clothing retail, I'm preferring to do all my shopping online than in a store for cost and convenience reasons. Anything that doesn't fit right I end up giving as gifts or returning to seller.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2017, 8:06 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
It's possible to do it better than that. The current system "protects" people's right to live in the gutter. Bad for them and really bad for our cities.
Exactly! Institutionalism was far from perfect, but neither is the current system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 4:13 PM
Ex-Ithacan's Avatar
Ex-Ithacan Ex-Ithacan is offline
Old Fart Forumer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Live in DC suburbs-Maryland
Posts: 22,154
I thought this sort of development could catch on in many cities:

https://detroit.curbed.com/2017/8/31...oit-video-tour

Sorry for the short (15 seconds) commercial before the video starts.

__________________
Get off my lawn you whippersnappers!!!!!


Retired, now Grandpa Daycare
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.