HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2014, 6:05 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasta View Post
Reed is rated poorly because they don't play the game. Year after year the school refuses to play the USNWR games.

By the way, how many schools have been busted now for fudging data to the USNWR?

Reed and Lewis + Clark are both very solid liberal arts colleges. Also, U of Portland is a decent Catholic college.
Yeah, Reed is one of the best examples of a college getting screwed for not playing by USNWR's rules (though I don't think that's a totally acceptable justification for their lack of transparency, plus they've incorporated their resulting iconoclast status in their marketing material). That said, Portland punches far below its weight when it comes to higher education.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2014, 8:29 PM
mello's Avatar
mello mello is offline
Babylon falling
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post

Housing construction doesn't really correlate heavily with population growth anyways. They're really loosely linked.
Could you or Mhays please explain this? Its very good information because the no growth NIMBY types always seem to think that more housing units equals more people. Are you saying that in the larger vicinity of construction population doesn't increase but what about in the census tract where the construction occurs? Thanks.
__________________
<<<<< I'm loving this economic "recovery" >>>>>
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2014, 9:00 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by mello View Post
Could you or Mhays please explain this? Its very good information because the no growth NIMBY types always seem to think that more housing units equals more people. Are you saying that in the larger vicinity of construction population doesn't increase but what about in the census tract where the construction occurs? Thanks.
Think of the older parts of LA County, or northern Orange County. The housing stock hasn't changed that much over the last few decades, but they managed to stuff another couple million people in the same housing stock. Household sizes increased (mostly due to poorer immigrants, housing affordability issues, and ethnics who culturally prefer multi-generational housing).

No one is going to decide to not have a baby, or to not immigrate to some place, or to put grandma on the street, just because you restrict housing. People will adapt, and so larger demographic trends are largely independent of construction stats.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.