I would agree that stadium construction in Europe is ahead of that in the States. And yes, there is a valid point that a lot of stadiums are architecturally non-descript, although it could be argued that there are various pressures not present in the States such as far more teams (and thus stadiums), relegation systems (introduces potential financial volatility for clubs) and of course a significantly reduced appetite for public funds to be used to construct what are private venues. In the UK clubs are expected to make contributions (to the public realm, transport, etc...) as a condition of planning approval, which is of course in stark contrast to the US where taxpayers are subsidising oligopolies.
As detailed by mousquet, there are certainly some creative and different venues – that aren’t just pushing design but engineering boundaries – materialising in Europe. Just take London:
- The Olympic Stadium with the world’s largest cantilevered roof and the digital wrap that will be installed in the New Year.
- Chelsea’s ‘gothic’ cathedral and non-symmetrical design.
- Spurs’ new White Hart Lane incorporating a second pitch for NFL matches.
Image sourced from The Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/sport/gal...hams-new-home?
Image sourced by RMB2007 from skyscrapercity: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpo...&postcount=320
One thing not to forget as well is that Europe still has a fantastic and vast array of historic venues, some dating back well over a century. Lord’s Cricket Ground in London is now over
200 years old and has been constantly added to over the years, most famously with the Media Centre which looks like an alien spaceship has landed to watch a game of test cricket.
Image sourced from TheFatnick: https://www.flickr.com/photos/809550...922105/sizes/l