HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1201  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 12:55 AM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 776
Would be interesting to see a home run crash landing into the adjacent building's lobby.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1202  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 1:13 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klippenstein View Post
Would be interesting to see a home run crash landing into the adjacent building's lobby.
I doubt that would happen looking at the renderings. There's a plaza with a lot of space between those buildings and the edge of the stadium.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1203  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 3:25 AM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 388
Sox fan account rendering of the skyline view:



Source: @SoxOn35th
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1204  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 3:45 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
Sox fan account rendering of the skyline view:

[img]https://i.imgur.com/2nBRbRB.jpg

Source: @SoxOn35th
Hate it. If they built, the worst and most senseless thing they could do would be to block their vistas with miserable signage and oversized jumbotrons. Let the South Loop skyline be the majority of the show. In my opinion, the Cubs partially ruined Wrigely with the recent signage and oversized jumbotrons.

The unofficial renderings present the outside plaza and outfield concourses as integrated, giving it a true neighborhood park feel. I hope they keep that concept if this thing gets built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1205  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 1:54 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,245
Why didnt the bears think of building a stadium here?...seems like a great spot to just take up the majority of the 78 ...i think having the bears at the 78 and white sox go soldier field for some baseball retrofitted stadium would make more sense..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1206  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 3:47 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhawk66 View Post
Ya think? Seems to me the views would be pretty boxed in with the immediate development around it. Not sure how much more would be visible. In other words: Too inner city for their own good, lol. Still cool, though.
yeah. its a cool location but the views wouldnt be as dramatic as people here seem to think...at least from inside the park. it would make good TV B roll from a helicopter tho
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1207  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 4:32 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
Sox fan account rendering of the skyline view:



Source: @SoxOn35th
Still nowhere to watch the game in the shade, The Cell also had no shade, while old wriggly has more than enough shade for that classical old park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1208  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 4:38 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
Still nowhere to watch the game in the shade, The Cell also had no shade, while old wriggly has more than enough shade for that classical old park.
That's not true at all - there are plenty of sections that have lots of shade, even in the middle of summer, and I'm not just referring to the nosebleed sections, but even the 100 level areas; just depends on where you sit. Not to mention, there is plenty of shading after 3-5pm when the sun falls behind the western side of the stadium. Source: am season ticket holder.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1209  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 4:46 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
That's not true at all - there are plenty of sections that have lots of shade, even in the middle of summer, and I'm not just referring to the nosebleed sections, but even the 100 level areas; just depends on where you sit. Not to mention, there is plenty of shading after 3-5pm when the sun falls behind the western side of the stadium. Source: am season ticket holder.
Also, most of their games are played at night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1210  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 4:55 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicubs111 View Post
Why didn't the bears think of building a stadium here?...seems like a great spot to just take up the majority of the 78 ...i think having the bears at the 78 and white sox go soldier field for some baseball retrofitted stadium would make more sense.
It would make more sense to remove most of the SF UFO's upper decking and make it a soccer field and reduce capacity in half for soccer and concerts.

Get rid of the upper levels but keep the press boxes, but cut the capacity roughly in half and not look like a UFO and show some more of the older field and the WWI original structure,

Swifties can watch her in the bears new dome anytime of the year, and we get a super bowl and a collage playoff game in addition to expanding what the convention industry can do with a 12-month facility.


The Dome for the Bears makes the most since and money for the city or county either in AH or DT. For the convention industry a Dome close on the south end of SF would be most productive, but even in AH there is convention possibilities although it would eat into McPlace, but it is still in Cook County in AH and more of the center of season ticket holders with money,

If done well, they could put in 85 K seats and still fill it full every game than for huge events have the ability to expand to 100k seats if possible. Think huge things too like the Democratic convention and even larger events.

A DT location would be a huge economic engine for the city.


If not, I would like to hear why not!


make no little plans

Last edited by bnk; Jan 19, 2024 at 5:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1211  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 5:36 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
That's not true at all - there are plenty of sections that have lots of shade, even in the middle of summer, and I'm not just referring to the nosebleed sections, but even the 100 level areas; just depends on where you sit. Not to mention, there is plenty of shading after 3-5pm when the sun falls behind the western side of the stadium. Source: am season ticket holder.
Well, the few times I was there it was a scorcher and I sat in Reindorf's seats, and on the other extreme the upper-level nose bleeds have little to no shade during June/ July day games.

And the bleachers are 100% in sun during day games, While Wriggly can get intense sun in midsummer in the bleachers its part of the experience and most are half in the bag before the game starts due to all if the bars with AC and can walk to the game.

Traveling busses from the Midwest, giant coach busses from all over the Midwest make it a pilgrimage.

It's not uncommon to see 20 fully laden modern huge busses from Iowa alone, for a day game.!!! At least from my memory 20 years ago, I expect even more now since all of the upgrades the Cubs Brass put into not only one of the oldest stadiums for NLB but the surrounding area, as much as people might not like the changes, it's a money-thing making machine!



The new ownership is smart and very wealthy, Not the worst conditions to be in honestly, Much improved over the previous ownership by far! It was not that long ago in geological terms the cubs won the world series championship and were very close to it several years before.



The Parking lots around the Cell produces nothing for the Sox. I'm a Cubs fan but would devastated if the White Stockings ever pulled out or their roosts.

I still want the Chicago NFL Cardinals to come back, but once a franchise leaves it's pretty much gone and never returns at least under the same name, and it has been way too long to resurrect it. Most of the NFL Chicago Cardinals fans are dead, just like the dead potential of Chicagoland getting even another expansion team if the NFL wants to try to keep expanding.


And the Bears hold the nuts and wouldn't approve of a new team in their market anyway, it's all about the money and us working stiffs have pretty much no say in this Billionaires ownership game, we are not even a factor regardless that we are the third largest TV market and the third largest metro in the USA.

Last edited by bnk; Jan 19, 2024 at 5:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1212  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 6:23 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
It would make more sense to remove most of the SF UFO's upper decking and make it a soccer field and reduce capacity in half for soccer and concerts.

Get rid of the upper levels but keep the press boxes, but cut the capacity roughly in half and not look like a UFO and show some more of the older field and the WWI original structure,
If money is no object (and it is a *very big* object given all the pressing needs for the city) - it would be great to get the White Sox at The 78, the Bears at 35th/Shields, and the Fire at a downscaled Soldier Field.

This way baseball gets an "urban village", football gets big open parking lots for tailgating, and soccer gets the lakefront park setting so the intrusive south lot can be returned to green space and the historic landmark SF returned to a better configuration.

Honestly the 3rd base side of Guaranteed Rate could probably repurposed as the north grandstand of a football stadium. Then you build a south grandstand and smaller east/west grandstands behind endzone. That might be something the Bears can actually afford privately. No dome.

BUT this is 3 ( or maybe 2.5) MAJOR stadium projects that all need to be paid for, and a big game of musical chairs that affects all 3 teams.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1213  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 6:37 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
Sox fan account rendering of the skyline view:



Source: @SoxOn35th
This isn't even close, imo. Look where the Sears Tower and 311 S. Wacker is. They're on the river. This stadium render is seemingly well across the river and oriented more east.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1214  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 9:22 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
According to a new article, the unit count for the 78 will drop to 5,000 from the original plan of 10,000. That's a major loss in my opinion. The stadium will have 35,000-38,000 seats, 4,000 underground parking spots, and a new elementary/high school for thousands of students. Related Midwest is still insistent about building offices at the site...

U of I is apparently “beyond excited” about having the White Sox next door to DPI:
Quote:
“If you talk about why a kid wants to go to a school and why a professor wants to teach at a school and you put it in an environment like the one that would be created at The 78,” the source said, “it will make it one of the premier schools in the country immediately because of why people will want to be there.”
https://chicago.suntimes.com/white-s...ar-development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1215  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 9:50 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
Hate it. If they built, the worst and most senseless thing they could do would be to block their vistas with miserable signage and oversized jumbotrons. Let the South Loop skyline be the majority of the show.
Relax. Pretty sure it's just the current stadium with a photoshopped skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1216  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 10:41 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Relax. Pretty sure it's just the current stadium with a photoshopped skyline.
That's exactly what it is; people's feathers are getting ruffled for no reason
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1217  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2024, 11:15 PM
UrbanDweller98 UrbanDweller98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 58
I’m confident this site will remain a giant urban prairie (with a road going through it) for the foreseeable future unless Related gets a big tenant, so I’m all for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1218  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 12:33 AM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
According to a new article, the unit count for the 78 will drop to 5,000 from the original plan of 10,000. That's a major loss in my opinion. The stadium will have 35,000-38,000 seats, 4,000 underground parking spots, and a new elementary/high school for thousands of students. Related Midwest is still insistent about building offices at the site...

U of I is apparently “beyond excited” about having the White Sox next door to DPI:

https://chicago.suntimes.com/white-s...ar-development
If they can get offices at some point, it would make for a more interesting development. Office users create demand for food, etc during the day. And that is one potential positive of having a ballpark - this could become an activated riverwalk that is a draw for outsiders. Unlike a primarily residential riverwalk that tends to eschew entertainment or anything drawing non-residents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1219  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 3:24 AM
Flaccer05 Flaccer05 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 108
duplicate

Last edited by Flaccer05; Jan 20, 2024 at 4:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1220  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 4:35 AM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 177
I’m sure someone already mentioned this but that stadium is facing the wrong way. U would think the stadium would be facing the same direction as oracle park in San Francisco
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.