HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 3:56 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,869
The SW portion is the only one that needs overpasses. The grade level crossings are creating a nightmare, especially in the westend.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 4:13 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
Anthony Henday West is the biggest nightmare of a "Drive" I've ever driven on. I can't count on one hand the # of times I've actually drove down that @#$#'ing road without stopping for 5km of traffic backed up southbound.

Today it was backed up from Callingwood Road.

Why the north end of AHD was allowed to be opened with traffic lights at 16A and SPR, Callingwood Road and 45th Ave is beyond me.

It is nice, when there is no one on it.

Finish the overpasses and I'll change my opinion. A ring road is nothing unless traffic can actually "move" on it.
Idiocy on the part of the provincial government. Just as they fail intervene and properly plan the growth of Alberta, they fail to plan and build the needed infrastructure to even support half the growth rate.

The provincial government under Klein was a disaster and now its really starting to show that he didn't have much vision beyond debt repayment and the end of his bright red nose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 5:16 AM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
Anthony Henday West is the biggest nightmare of a "Drive" I've ever driven on. I can't count on one hand the # of times I've actually drove down that @#$#'ing road without stopping for 5km of traffic backed up southbound.

Today it was backed up from Callingwood Road.

Why the north end of AHD was allowed to be opened with traffic lights at 16A and SPR, Callingwood Road and 45th Ave is beyond me.

It is nice, when there is no one on it.

Finish the overpasses and I'll change my opinion. A ring road is nothing unless traffic can actually "move" on it.
And its not just the 216 they did screwed up this way, the 201 will be similar when the second phase opens in the next few years. There will be at least 4 sets of lights on it when the NW leg is intially 'fully' opened, including one for which there is no plan whatsoever to remove (the others have future bridges already planned for). At least the NE section, which is being done as P3, is moving ahead, 3 months after announcing it they're alreday pouring concrete for bridge abutments. The NW section they've been working on for 4 years still has at least 2 bridges that will be in place for the intial opening barely even started on.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 5:38 AM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
The SW portion is the only one that needs overpasses. The grade level crossings are creating a nightmare, especially in the westend.
To get traffic moving, sure, but there are many more improvements that need to be made to the entire road. On the east side, something needs to be done about the sub-standard curbed median around the Sherwood Park Freeway. There's a very poor left-shoulder width that as a result, and the actual interchange with the Sherwood Park Freeway will need to be rebuilt with a better collector lane system at the very least, because the existing weave-zone is an extremely dangerous design for a 100 km/hr posted speed. There doesn't seem to be enough right of way to build anything much fancier than that. The actual bridge structure at the interchange also has very low clearance, NB direction is 4.9 M if I recall.

Other than that, improvements to lighting, more consistent signage, etc. It all needs to be done to more than just the southwest leg. I'm curious if the Province will eventually sign exit numbers once the whole ring is done and built up to freeway standards...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 5:53 AM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhatdan View Post
Idiocy on the part of the provincial government. Just as they fail intervene and properly plan the growth of Alberta, they fail to plan and build the needed infrastructure to even support half the growth rate.

The provincial government under Klein was a disaster and now its really starting to show that he didn't have much vision beyond debt repayment and the end of his bright red nose.
Naw. It's called phased development, it happens all the time in road developments, particularly new routes. Traffic volumes have to warrant higher capacities, and while this is being anticipated, 30,000 VPD is awfully low to be warranting full access-control right off the bat.

Besides, the original SW ring wasn't even supposed to include interchanges at 111 street and Terwilliger, and the 127 street crossing was also supposed to be signalized, not RIRO like it currently is (better). The province already stepped up it's initial road implementation substantially, and did enough earth-movement around future interchanges to ensure that this route could easily be upgraded to freeway standards in a hurry --when traffic levels warrant it.

Seriously, the SW ring road has the potential to be the nicest section of the entire ring road. There were plenty of things the province did not cheap-out on because they had a vision for an ultimate phase implementation of the road. Ever wonder why the ramps heading SE from Terwilligar to AHD are so long? They have R/W reserved there for a huge systems interchange there (they recognized that the city ultimately wants Terwilligar to be a freeway connection from Whitemud to AHD). And what about this concrete pavement? Drive on an interstate sometime... it lasts twice as long and can handle much heavier truck traffic without showing it.

I'm sorry but I can't let people derail the SW as being terrible when everything is in place for this road to become the best-designed one in our city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 3:43 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0773|=\ View Post
I'm sorry but I can't let people derail the SW as being terrible when everything is in place for this road to become the best-designed one in our city.
But this is what IRKS me - SW AHD is great, IF it was opened for Vehicle use when it was 100% completed - not 60% completed.

It will "become" the best in our city - but for now; the SW leg heading North from about 3:30PM to 6PM is the worst experience one can endure.

I thought I was going to loose my mind.

Any visitor to Alberta that flys to Edmonton to get to, let's say, Jasper - takes the "Ring Road" to "quickly fly around the city" will inevitably have a sour taste in their mouths after driving that congested, backed up, smelly hot mess.

What's taking them so long to build the overpasses across 16A/SPR? I believe the dirt pile/approachways have been sitting there for at least 3-4 years.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 3:55 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,767
^no friggen kidding.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 5:04 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
Oh and thank friggin' god it has no potholes
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 5:18 PM
big W big W is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: E-Town
Posts: 5,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0773|=\ View Post
Naw. It's called phased development, it happens all the time in road developments, particularly new routes. Traffic volumes have to warrant higher capacities, and while this is being anticipated, 30,000 VPD is awfully low to be warranting full access-control right off the bat.

Besides, the original SW ring wasn't even supposed to include interchanges at 111 street and Terwilliger, and the 127 street crossing was also supposed to be signalized, not RIRO like it currently is (better). The province already stepped up it's initial road implementation substantially, and did enough earth-movement around future interchanges to ensure that this route could easily be upgraded to freeway standards in a hurry --when traffic levels warrant it.

Seriously, the SW ring road has the potential to be the nicest section of the entire ring road. There were plenty of things the province did not cheap-out on because they had a vision for an ultimate phase implementation of the road. Ever wonder why the ramps heading SE from Terwilligar to AHD are so long? They have R/W reserved there for a huge systems interchange there (they recognized that the city ultimately wants Terwilligar to be a freeway connection from Whitemud to AHD). And what about this concrete pavement? Drive on an interstate sometime... it lasts twice as long and can handle much heavier truck traffic without showing it.

I'm sorry but I can't let people derail the SW as being terrible when everything is in place for this road to become the best-designed one in our city.
Thats all well and good, however this is the problem. WOuld you go get a Ferrari and then decide that the wheels and tires are to expensive so you have them taken off and get the ones from a Kia. They don't fit and this is what the province did on the AHD. They went through all the expense and then cheaped out for a minor thing in the overall cost.
__________________
SHOFEAR- "The other goalie should have to turn in his man card. What a sorry display that was." - March 24, 2008
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 5:23 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,767
and now, like 23avenue, we will pay considerably more.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 9:32 PM
Herr_Verlage's Avatar
Herr_Verlage Herr_Verlage is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,149
Can someone shed some light on why they decided to build the Henday as only a double lane project? Are they going to have three lanes in some sections? It is maddening that they did not build the whole thing as a triple lane each way minimum. Have they not thought about the future?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 9:46 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herr_Verlage View Post
Can someone shed some light on why they decided to build the Henday as only a double lane project? Are they going to have three lanes in some sections? It is maddening that they did not build the whole thing as a triple lane each way minimum. Have they not thought about the future?
AHD is built to be expandable to 4 lanes per direction, including the bridge over the river... they have thought about the future...
Also, I believe the SE is 3 lanes per till 66 st
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 11:02 PM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herr_Verlage View Post
Can someone shed some light on why they decided to build the Henday as only a double lane project? Are they going to have three lanes in some sections? It is maddening that they did not build the whole thing as a triple lane each way minimum. Have they not thought about the future?
Traffic volumes don't warrant more than two lanes each way, even with backups at lights. 3 lanes each way is suitable for 60-100k vehicles per day, not 30, which most of the Henday (except from Whitemud to SPR) carries.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 11:14 PM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
But this is what IRKS me - SW AHD is great, IF it was opened for Vehicle use when it was 100% completed - not 60% completed.

It will "become" the best in our city - but for now; the SW leg heading North from about 3:30PM to 6PM is the worst experience one can endure.

I thought I was going to loose my mind.

Any visitor to Alberta that flys to Edmonton to get to, let's say, Jasper - takes the "Ring Road" to "quickly fly around the city" will inevitably have a sour taste in their mouths after driving that congested, backed up, smelly hot mess.

What's taking them so long to build the overpasses across 16A/SPR? I believe the dirt pile/approachways have been sitting there for at least 3-4 years.
Actually, that grading has been sitting around for 10-15 years, it's existed ever since the first leg from Whitemud to SPR has been around --this means it was done by the city and not the province. So, now that this section is under provincial control, that infrastructure has to be reviewed, which takes time and money.

I sympathize with your views, I'm just saying, there's a pile of this road getting built at a dizzying pace right now, and we've even seen in the news that they're getting some preliminary consulting for a SPR interchange. There's also some work being done on a 142 street interchange just south of Terwilligar Drive, so it's not like this road is being abandoned right now.

That SPR interchange, BTW is supposed to have 4 separate bridge structures so it's not the cheapest thing to just up-and-build, and our economy only turned favorable in the last seven years or so... a lot of eyebrows would have been raised if the city or province decided to just plow ahead on that interchange, particularly when the Whitemud to SPR section only carried 20,000 VPD on it's own.

At any rate, infrastructure existing before the province took over the route requires a little more time than upgrades to provincially funded/designed/constructed highway. Design codes are different, soil grading, all that stuff. Be thankful the province is building this route and not the city. Experience has shown me that the City of Edmonton cuts too many corners when designing anything that remotely resembles a freeway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 11:24 PM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by big W View Post
Thats all well and good, however this is the problem. WOuld you go get a Ferrari and then decide that the wheels and tires are to expensive so you have them taken off and get the ones from a Kia. They don't fit and this is what the province did on the AHD. They went through all the expense and then cheaped out for a minor thing in the overall cost.
Tires are easily replaceable, the engine and body of a Ferrari aren't. That's the point I'm trying to make. Alberta budgeted this but they planned ahead when they realized the cash allotted to this project wasn't going to give the user a full freeway, and there wasn't any more cash coming. They were smart enough to say, "even if it takes us two phases to get this done, the initial phase had better compliment a good design".

They could have given us one or two more overpasses but narrowed the lanes/shoulders or just given us asphalt pavement, but they thought ahead, they knew that a systems interchange at the south side with left-lane access to SW AHD was ESSENTIAL because that route was a part of a much bigger trade corridor known as CANAMEX --but that costs big bucks. Then they realized truck traffic from Alaska is anticipated to use this stretch of road, as this is the link in that trade corridor, so if they cheaped out on the base/paving, and fundamentals of the highway, the road would be going to sh!t today.

I'm glad that they made the initial phase of this corridor with the future in mind, because it now has the potential to be a workhorse for carrying heavy traffic, even if it means one or two years of sitting at temporary signalized intersections. It'll get done, and thankfully they don't have to tear the road apart to do so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2007, 11:46 PM
Edmonchuck's Avatar
Edmonchuck Edmonchuck is offline
why try anymore
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where we can lose things, and replace them with nothing...or a wananbe yaletown
Posts: 3,314
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0773|=\ View Post
Actually, that grading has been sitting around for 10-15 years, it's existed ever since the first leg from Whitemud to SPR has been around --this means it was done by the city and not the province. So, now that this section is under provincial control, that infrastructure has to be reviewed, which takes time and money.

(...). Be thankful the province is building this route and not the city. Experience has shown me that the City of Edmonton cuts too many corners when designing anything that remotely resembles a freeway.

It has been around since 1992 - when I had cancer...I remember it then..

Edmonton has a poor track record of building infrastructure it needs, preferring to be overly prudent (read lazy) and overly cautious (read chickenshit).

Gateway...23 ave....Whitemud.....Yellowhead (yes, after the original plans were scrapped)...Capilano (the freeway to the next stop light)....shall I go on????
__________________
Change is impossible if the impediments to it remain in positions of power. Some people need to retire, and in Edmonton speak, that means they will die in their office.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:52 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.