Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneHugo
A week to go, Faulconer or Alvarez?
|
I'm voting for Mr. Alvarez.
I think it's a bit simplistic to say that Faulconer is pro development and Alvarez in anti development.
Faulconer's core constituents are NIMBYs, people who tend to be older, wealthier, white males who live above the 8 and who don't want to see SD grow anymore. Sure Faulconer is friends with people like Manchester, but Faulconer can't overturn court decisions as mayor to get things like NBC going.
Faulconer seems to me to represent old San Diego - the San Diego where downtown and the rest of the city are kept very separate. Alvarez seems to represent the future - younger, and with a vision that SD can be a dynamic city throughout all the neighborhoods inclusive of downtown with more cohesion.
Anyway, I don't mean to go on a political rant here, but I'm surprised that people on a forum who often seem frustrated with SD's status quo would be for the status quo candidate.