HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Portland Suburbs and the State of Oregon


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2006, 10:54 PM
PuyoPiyo's Avatar
PuyoPiyo PuyoPiyo is offline
Puyo!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 627
Wow, Vancouver WA is really gaining ^-^

But it have been ALWAYS and BIG shame when Dennys resturant in downtown Vancouver closed down.
__________________
Colorful Past, Bright Future.
My Diagram =====>> http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m21438
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 8:03 AM
der Reisender's Avatar
der Reisender der Reisender is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: PDX
Posts: 471
found on Oregonlive, wasn't sure where else to drop this:

Downtown Vancouver street redesign on hold
VANCOUVER -- Attorney Scott Horenstein envisioned a bold project on Main Street, with a mixed-use structure on a half block at least three levels high, with retail, offices, parking and residential units.

But to the disappointment of Horenstein others, the city has shelved plans for a dramatic street makeover, which had been scheduled to commence next year.

Now, the earliest that improvements could take place is 2008, but no funding has been committed. Other city transportation priorities, downtown and elsewhere, take precedence over tired-looking Main.

The Main Street Improvement Project calls for a redesign from Fifth to 15th streets, with new accent pavers, sidewalks, parking , public art, overhead lighting, trees and other landscaping, and street furniture, such as benches.

A proposed business and occupation tax on businesses would have paid for Main Street and several other transportation improvement projects around the city.

But the City Council backed away from the B&O tax, adopting a per-employee fee on businesses which will generate far less money. Main Street dropped off the transportation priority list.

-- Allan Brettman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2006, 10:11 AM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
maybe they can use the eventual transportation funds to revamp main street when they finally get light rail up there. i know the tentative plan runs light rail right up main.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2007, 6:50 PM
360Rich 360Rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vantucky
Posts: 256
Plans shift for ex-Denny's site

Plans shift for ex-Denny's site

Wednesday, January 31, 2007
JULIA ANDERSON Columbian business editor

Market reaction already is modifying an ambitious redevelopment plan for the former Denny's restaurant site in downtown Vancouver.

Initially, a nine-story building with condos and possibly a restaurant was envisioned for the site by the Al Angelo Co.

The Vancouver commercial and residential real estate company expects this week to sign a long-term ground lease for the property at 400 E. Mill Plain Blvd., considered the gateway to downtown Vancouver. It's been more than two years since a Denny's restaurant closed there.

But neither condos nor a top-floor restaurant got much traction over the past several months, said Al "Corky" Angelo Jr.

Angelo said his family-owned company, already a major downtown property owner, is now considering construction of a 100,000-square-foot office building with a bit of ground-floor retail.

"We're actually in the process of redesigning the whole thing," Angelo said. "Right now we're talking about five or six floors of office with two floors of covered parking and some retail."

Angelo said the site's islandlike location -- bordered by Interstate 5, Mill Plain and 15th Street -- made the building's residential component unattractive. In addition, no name-brand restaurants showed interest in the project.

"It doesn't look like housing or a restaurant of any size is part of the equation," Angelo said this week.

City planners seem comfortable with the changes.

"The building needs to make an urban architectural statement," said Steve Burdick, Vancouver's community development manager, of what the city would like on the site. "That's the key. The site is never going to have a lot of pedestrian traffic. Office probably is the logical thing. ? 100,000 square feet is a lot of office space."

By comparison, Columbian Publisher Scott Campbell is constructing a 112,000-square-foot, six-story building southwest of Esther Short Park. Price tag? About $30 million.

Separately, the city is planning construction of a signature clock tower on a portion of the site similar to one in Esther Short Park across from the Hilton Vancouver Washington.

Angelo said his company, which is based nearby at 404 E. 15th St., would likely relocate to the new building.

The Angelos began working on the project in November.

"We tested the market with a couple of ideas, and based on the response, we've made some adjustments," he said.

The company is scheduled for a preliminary conference with city planners early next month.

http://www.columbian.com/business/bu...7news99143.cfm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2007, 6:50 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
Vancouver | Mill Plain Site | x feet | 5 and 6 floors | U/C

Plans shift for ex-Denny's site

Wednesday, January 31, 2007
JULIA ANDERSON Columbian business editor

Market reaction already is modifying an ambitious redevelopment plan for the former Denny's restaurant site in downtown Vancouver.

Initially, a nine-story building with condos and possibly a restaurant was envisioned for the site by the Al Angelo Co.

The Vancouver commercial and residential real estate company expects this week to sign a long-term ground lease for the property at 400 E. Mill Plain Blvd., considered the gateway to downtown Vancouver. It's been more than two years since a Denny's restaurant closed there.

But neither condos nor a top-floor restaurant got much traction over the past several months, said Al "Corky" Angelo Jr.

Angelo said his family-owned company, already a major downtown property owner, is now considering construction of a 100,000-square-foot office building with a bit of ground-floor retail.

"We're actually in the process of redesigning the whole thing," Angelo said. "Right now we're talking about five or six floors of office with two floors of covered parking and some retail."

Angelo said the site's islandlike location -- bordered by Interstate 5, Mill Plain and 15th Street -- made the building's residential component unattractive. In addition, no name-brand restaurants showed interest in the project.

"It doesn't look like housing or a restaurant of any size is part of the equation," Angelo said this week.

City planners seem comfortable with the changes.

"The building needs to make an urban architectural statement," said Steve Burdick, Vancouver's community development manager, of what the city would like on the site. "That's the key. The site is never going to have a lot of pedestrian traffic. Office probably is the logical thing. ? 100,000 square feet is a lot of office space."

By comparison, Columbian Publisher Scott Campbell is constructing a 112,000-square-foot, six-story building southwest of Esther Short Park. Price tag? About $30 million.

Separately, the city is planning construction of a signature clock tower on a portion of the site similar to one in Esther Short Park across from the Hilton Vancouver Washington.

Angelo said his company, which is based nearby at 404 E. 15th St., would likely relocate to the new building.

The Angelos began working on the project in November.

"We tested the market with a couple of ideas, and based on the response, we've made some adjustments," he said.

The company is scheduled for a preliminary conference with city planners early next month.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2007, 9:30 PM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
hmmm..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2007, 10:55 PM
PDXPaul's Avatar
PDXPaul PDXPaul is offline
Redfin!
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fremont
Posts: 1,268
Man I remember that Denny's...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2007, 10:59 PM
PDXPaul's Avatar
PDXPaul PDXPaul is offline
Redfin!
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fremont
Posts: 1,268
We need light rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 8:04 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
Port commissioners to discuss whether to sell the Quay property

Thursday, February 01, 2007
By JONATHAN NELSON Columbian staff writer
The Red Lion Hotel at the Quay real estate — hotel, restaurant and surrounding property — has been owned by the Port of Vancouver for 40 years. (STEVEN LANE/The Columbian)

A shift in power and landscape could mean the Port of Vancouver is edging closer to selling its long-held Red Lion Hotel at the Quay property on the Columbia River.

Possible sale of the 9.75-acre site and commercial buildings there -- a hotel, restaurant, meeting space and adjacent office building -- will be the topic of a port commission public forum next week. The commission's willingness to explore a possible sale fits with changing waterfront uses and the port's overall economic development goals.

A group of investors led by Gramor Development of Tualatin, Ore., is buying the adjacent 29-acre Boise Cascade site with the intention of transforming the former industrial land into a new riverfront neighborhood. Boise listed the land for $26 million. The sale is pending as traffic and access issues are resolved.

Port Commissioner Nancy Baker said it's logical that Gramor would be interested in the Quay site west of the Interstate 5 Bridge.

Gramor officials would not comment.

At the same time, the port is undertaking a massive expansion to the west, which could include the purchase of the former Alcoa/Vanalco aluminum smelter site. Cash from the sale of the Quay property would support such endeavors.

Quay market value could be close to $10.5 million, based on a $25 per square foot average price for similar downtown property.

Red Lion wants to stay

The port commission wants the public's input as part of its decision-making process and will have a forum at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday at the port's office, 3103 N.W. Lower River Road, with the sole topic being the Quay property.

The port has owned the Quay property for 40 years, but its hotel-restaurant operation has never really fit with the its core mission to create jobs through marine and industrial development. But the property has historical ties to the port and gives the public access to the Columbia River waterfront.

Spokane-based Red Lion Hotel Corp. holds a long-term operating lease at the Quay. The company recently spent $1.7 million to upgrade the 160-room hotel. Red Lion's lease with the port runs through 2033. Red Lion officials have said in the past they have no interest in leaving the downtown Vancouver location. A company representative will be at Wednesday's meeting.

Shift under way

The pending Boise sale and arrival of Brian Wolfe, who replaced Bob Moser as a port commissioner a year ago, has changed the dynamics.

Arch Miller, port commission president, favors selling the Quay site. Commissioner Baker has said that she wants to retain the land, and Wolfe is somewhere in the middle.

Todd Coleman, the port's deputy executive director, said the port is working with Red Lion to preserve the company's interests.

Miller pointed out that the hotel has never been a high performing asset for the port, which receives a base rent payment plus 4 percent of gross receipts above that base.

Those payments have been flat since 2001, with the port receiving $222,870 in 2006. The port's total operating budget is over $50 million.

Waterfront access

To Baker, the public access to the water trumps the financial performance.

Wolfe agrees the Quay is a weak fit with the port's larger goals, but also sees Baker's point that public access, which includes a boat landing and river-view outdoor amphitheater, is a critical community asset.

The Quay site makes less sense in the port's portfolio given the intense work of the past few years to develop Columbia Gateway, a tract of 544 acres of industrial land on the port's western boundary.

Just to improve rail access to the port and out to Columbia Gateway is expected to cost at least $56 million. Port officials are already talking with possible tenants and hope to have the land ready by 2010.

Jonathan Nelson covers the Port of Vancouver for The Columbian. He can be reached at 360-759-8013 or via e-mail at jonathan.nelson@columbian.com.


Public meeting

* What: A public forum on the Port of Vancouver's ownership of the Red Lion Hotel at the Quay property.

* When: 5:30 p.m. Wednesday.

* Where: The port's office at 3103 N.W. Lower River Road.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2007, 2:09 AM
sirsimon sirsimon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nowhere...now here
Posts: 355
^ Has anyone been in the restaurant at the Red Lion? It is a crazy ship-themed sort of place. Arrrr.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2007, 3:20 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
It's been at least ten years. I usually can't drive past Who Song's, McMenamin's and Beaches in hopes to get something better there.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2007, 4:06 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
Looks like they are still going through with the pre application process...

Pre-application conferences have been scheduled for Thursday, February 8, 2007, in the Citizens Service Center Fourth Floor Conference Room, 1313 Main Street. The following projects will be discussed:

9 a.m. PRJ2007-00063/PAC2007-00004 D Street Tower
Description: Nine-story mixed-use building.
Location: 400 E Mill Plain Blvd
Assessed Parcel Size: 29,375 square feet
Zoning Designation: CX
Neighborhood Association: Esther Short
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 8:54 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
Vancouver vs. Clark County

Vancouver has special interest in annexation bill

Friday, February 09, 2007
By KATHIE DURBIN Columbian staff writer

OLYMPIA -- The fight over who controls annexation decisions in Clark County has made its way to the 2007 Washington Legislature.

Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver, introduced a bill that would give boundary review boards the authority to expand annexations. The bill would reverse a 2006 Washington Supreme Court ruling that such boards could only reduce annexation proposals.

"That makes no sense," said Moeller, a former Vancouver city councilman.

House Bill 1162 gives boundary review boards the authority to add or delete territory and to adjust the boundary of a proposed annexation to include "all or any land located within an unincorporated urban growth area."

The purpose of his bill, Moeller said, is to allow cities to annex adjacent urbanized areas.

"The whole idea behind the Growth Management Act is that things that look like cities and act like cities should be cities," he said.

Clark County commissioners dismantled the county's boundary review board last year after Vancouver talked about asking the board to expand a proposed 823-acre annexation to encompass an urbanized area 20 times as large.

Moeller says HB 1162 is a precursor to a bill he plans to introduce in a future session that would require annexation in the state's most populous counties to be governed by boundary review boards.

"I want eventually for our county to have a boundary review board again," he said.

Opposition to the bill comes mainly from people who refuse to sign annexation petitions and then learn that cities have annexed their land anyway, Moeller contends.

"They don't understand the idea of a republic," he said. In a republic, "You get your say, but you don't always get your way."

Suzan Wallace, Vancouver's annexation coordinator, told the House Local Government Committee this week that the bill is important to the city's ability to plan for future growth.

"As Vancouver is the fourth-largest city and one of the fastest-growing in the state, we see this bill as a tool to implement our annexation plan, and we do have an active annexation plan," Wallace said in an interview. Being able to plan for delivery of urban services also is critical to the city's business recruitment efforts, she said.

"The role of the boundary review boards is to assure that services are delivered in the most effective and efficient way," she said.

The bill also has drawn support from King County, the cities of Renton and Longview, and the Washington State Association of Boundary Review Boards.

But local taxing districts have concerns.

Harold Schlomann, executive director of the Washington Association of Sewer and Water Districts, said his organization opposes the bill because it would give boundary review boards unlimited authority to expand city boundaries -- and force residents of special taxing districts into cities -- without a vote of the people.

"I believe all annexations should be approved by voters," Schlomann said.

Clark County did not testify at the hearing. Moeller said Mike Burgess, the county's new lobbyist, told him: "We don't have a boundary review board, so we don't have an issue here."


Update

* Previously: The Washington Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that boundary review boards could only reduce, not enlarge, annexation proposals.

* What's new: Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver, has introduced a bill that would give those boards the authority to expand annexation areas.

* What's next: Moeller hopes to introduce legislation in a future session requiring that boundary review boards govern annexations in the state's most populous counties.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 9:39 PM
PuyoPiyo's Avatar
PuyoPiyo PuyoPiyo is offline
Puyo!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 627
Keep it up.
__________________
Colorful Past, Bright Future.
My Diagram =====>> http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m21438
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2007, 10:29 PM
PDXPaul's Avatar
PDXPaul PDXPaul is offline
Redfin!
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fremont
Posts: 1,268
"We don't have a boundary review board so we don't have a problem." What a bunch of hacks. Fucking embarassing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2007, 9:14 AM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
i'm glad i don't live there any more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2007, 4:01 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,107
TURBULENCE at urban airports

Sunday, February 18, 2007
By JONATHAN NELSON Columbian staff writer

Developers of Vancouvercenter assumed their plans for offices, condominiums and apartments in downtown Vancouver would sail through a Federal Aviation Administration review.

After all, the design met the city's height requirements for structures within a mile of Pearson Field's landing strip.

The FAA gave its blessing to the project, as long as two floors were lopped off.

Turns out the city's building code didn't mesh with the federal agency.

Some frantic negotiations ensued and resulted in developers being able to put those two floors back into the design. City officials are working with the FAA to get local ordinances aligned with federal requirements.

The misunderstanding highlights the tension between general aviation airports such as Pearson and redevelopment.

From 1981 to 2005, 987 public use airstrips have closed throughout the U.S. Evergreen Airport in east Vancouver joined those ranks last summer when the land became too valuable and was sold to be transformed into a retail center.

The dynamics of general aviation airports coexisting with urban areas are particularly acute in Vancouver as city leaders push for a denser downtown. That often means going vertical with taller buildings -- a strategy that is expected to be used for the creation of neighborhoods along the Columbia River in Pearson's shadow.

Steve Burdick, manager of Vancouver's economic development department, agreed Pearson's presence is restrictive, but not so much that it would quash the momentum of continued downtown renewal.

"Are there available opportunities to build out the downtown to the vision contained in the Vancouver City Center Vision plan?" Burdick asked. "The answer is yes, there are."

Dave Copenhaver, a principal in Gramor Development of Tualatin, Ore., which is poised to buy and develop the waterfront property, agrees.

"I don't see Pearson as a negative," Copenhaver said. "At our project's east end we envision buildings of up to six floors, while at the west end (farther from Pearson) building heights could go to 12 to 16 floors. I don't see that as ­underdeveloping the site."

Economic impact

The debate in Pearson's case is also one of economics.

Ron Frederiksen, a pilot and chairman of Pearson's aviation advisory committee, said Pearson is part of a larger transportation network that attracts tourists, brings business to the area and trains tomorrow's pilots.

"If you don't nurture that, the whole system will fall apart," he said.

Washington state officials agree with Frederiksen and in 2005 ordered the transportation department to update its information on the state's network of 140 public use airports, and to get a better grasp of each airport's impact to the economy. The intent is to better understand how the facilities work together so that money can be invested in the right locations to meet future demands. The study, which will be completed in 2009, is paying particular attention to four high-population centers, including Southwest Washington.

Portland International Airport and other commercial fields garner most of the public attention. But general aviation airports are more numerous and Pearson is the busiest in Southwest Washington with 50,000 annual landings and departures. According to 2003 figures, it was 12th out of 140 statewide fields, based on the activity of planes registered to each of those facilities. Pearson was also ranked 26th in the state in terms of general operations, a list that includes Seattle and Spokane.

Pearson is only expected to get busier, primarily from visiting pilots.

Business connection

A USA Today story reported that two-thirds of the hours flown by private planes are for business reasons, and the number of those flying hours has increased 12.5 percent from 2001 to 2005, according to Federal Aviation Administration data.

Sean Loughran, Pearson's operations manager, said 60 percent of the traffic into the airport is considered transient -- pilots with planes not registered to Pearson. Half of the transient traffic was for business reasons.

The airport sits on 134 acres primary owned by the city with a small piece falling on National Park Service property and is part of the fort's historical designation. It is hemmed in by state Highway 14 to the south, a commercial district to the east and the Fort Vancouver National Historic Site to the north and south. It is home to 175 pilots that have registered their planes at Pearson.

Loughran is the airport's sole employee overseeing a $500,000 annual budget. About 94 percent of the revenue comes from leases on hangars, a maintenance operation and flight school.

Pearson is considered the oldest operating airport in the country, Loughran said, and has a who's who of pilots who have touched down on the field, including Tex Rankin, Charles Lindbergh, Jimmy Doolittle, Chuck Yeager and Valery Chkalov. Frederiksen said it's that mystique of pilots and flying that drew him to Pearson as a child.

"I was one of those kids at Pearson, I was 13, looking through the chain link fence and wondering how do I become a pilot," he said.

Frederiksen found the answer in the U.S. Air Force, becoming a flight instructor for the T-38 supersonic jet. But the vagabond lifestyle of the military and commercial pilots pushed Frederiksen into business. He earned a masters in business from Gonzaga University and returned to Vancouver, where he bought the family business, RSV Construction Services.

Then, in 1997, Gene Frederiksen asked his son what happened to his little boy's dream of flying. Ron Frederiksen promised his father, who was dying of cancer, that he'd fly again.

Today, Frederiksen donates time to Angel Flight, a collection of pilots who ferry people to medical appointments. He also donates his services to charity auctions as a way to demystify flying and explain the importance of general aviation airports.

"The busier Portland gets the more important Pearson is," he said.

Jonathan Nelson is a Columbian business writer. He can be reached at 360-759-8013 or via e-mail at jonathan.nelson@columbian.com.


Did you know?

* Pearson Field is a nontowered airport, meaning pilots report to Portland International Airport when departing or arriving.

* The airport was named in the 1920s after Lt. Alexander Pearson, a Vancouver native and U.S. Army aviator.

* Pearson records about 50,000 landings and departures each year. The number is expected to increase as more business travelers chose private planes over commercial flights.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2007, 5:21 PM
JoshYent JoshYent is offline
=)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 164
interesting article.........
__________________
Suburban kid, wishing he lived in a urban jungle.

Stop building out, start building up, BUT DO IT RIGHT the first time....so we dont have to come back and fix our mistakes 50 years from now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2007, 2:29 AM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2007, 3:37 AM
360Rich 360Rich is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vantucky
Posts: 256
^^Thanks for the wikipedia link.

I stare at Pearson from my desk everyday. From time to time, I can watch a plane land, a train pass by, a boat go up the Columbia, and cars travel on I-5 simultaneously. It's like my own little multimodal transportation mural!

I had no idea it was the oldest operating airfield in the country.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Portland Suburbs and the State of Oregon
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:02 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.