Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus
What on earth makes you think the first design was not conceived precisely with the taste of the UDP in mind: bland, safe and boring? It is expensive to design and redesign a building. It makes no sense paying for a bold and daring design when practice tells you it will likely be rejected by a group of architectural overseers notorious for being averse to originality and exceptionalism.
You are making the mistake of praising a group of people for "solving" the very problem they are responsible for creating.
|
After working for one of the most sustainble and innovative architects in the city, I can say that you REALLY underestimate how many of our Vancouver 'starchitects' are trying to innovate for innovation's, or height's, sake. I was told point blank by one of the top 10 architect in BC that he/she lived in the forests of North Van and couldn't imagine living in a condo.
...I had to remind him that if he wanted to get rid of his property at the top of Wall Center, I'd be happy to take it.
Architecture is not all about height, especially not for the kind of architects that are from Vancouver. The UDP isn't some sort of tyrant. Look up in the thread: you have Trofirhen raving about Dubai and about how they were able to build skyscrapers in sand, when the real issue that keeps this site from growing taller is actually that an elevator core would need more space if the building were to be taller, rendering it unfeasible on the current site. Come on, people. Fish > Barrel. I think this new rendering will make a perfect compliment to Bentall 5, and I'm all for it. Sometimes people need to step back from height and prestige, stop blaming the UDP for all failings, and recognize goodness when they see it.
It's like you're all republicans.