Quote:
Originally Posted by llamaorama
I mean, historically it was.
|
Tokyo became officially the capital of Japan in 1868 and before it was already the siege of the government.
If Kyoto had stayed the capital of Japan, it may have become a very different city.
Much bigger, I think.
Rome was not even the capital of Italy back then.
After the fall of the Roman empire the city shrinked to become a rather "small" city. Many other italian cities were more important.
The city had only 194,500 in 1861. it has only exceeded one million inhabitants in the 1930s. The current Rome is the result of a booming demographic during the 20th century.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mousquet
You do realize that such a statement is senseless in a super large federation like that of the US, right?
NYC, LA and Chicago are the most representative cities of their country abroad, and that's the way it will be for this entire century.
Yet NYC isn't even their local state administrative capital.
|
"The capital and the biggest city represent". Plural, it means that the capital and the biggest city are two different cities.
Both are importants.