Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedford_DJ
On another note I also got thinking about the Fairview Overpass. IMO instead of a new interchange being built I would rather see a workable intersection;
From Windsor Street the Bfd Hwy would be three lanes westbound and three lanes eastbound with a narrow median. The existing far left EB lane would be removed for a section to make this possible.
At Joe Howe a signalized intersection would be built with Joe Howe having three lanes NB. Two of these lanes would be dedicated for left-turn and one for right-turns. SB there would be two lanes. The Bfd Hwy WB would have the far left lane dedicated to left-turns only. On the EB side the Bfd Hwy would remain as two lanes and would keep the existing ramp for right-turns. This plan would not require much road reconfiguration work since the Bfd Hwy is already five lanes at the overpass and Joe Howe is four lanes.
|
I don't see how this could possibly work. At morning rush the traffic is already stop and crawl inbound. How would anyone heading WB on the highway ever get on to Joe Howe? And how much slower would the inbound traffic on the highway get with yet another set of lighhts? You have seen the existing non-functional signalized intersection at Windsor St -- in the evening traffic trying to get onto the MAcKay takes forever.
In a perfect world a proper grade-separated interchange would be built both at Joe Howe and at Windsor St. The hairpin turn needs to go. The province had a perfect opportunity to reserve some land when Winlie Containers was demolished a few years ago, but instead the let Ceres build a staging area for trucks hard up against the existing overpass. Foolish.