Posted Jul 30, 2010, 12:25 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomrQT
That's the official stance by the people who decide the height of buildings, but seriously... an antenna is just as tangible as a spire. They are both physically there, so if one counts then the other should count. This is a debate that has been going on for a long long time. Those pieces on top of the Sears Tower and Empire State Building really do enhance the visuals and let people more easily recognize the buildings, just as a decorative spire does. If you removed them, I'm sure most people would agree the buildings would look odd without them. Oh well, there is an official stance on the subject that at the moment, isn't up for change.
|
thats how i see it too visually they are just as important as spires.
|