HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2019, 3:47 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
I was attempting to improve the connection between SFPR and TCH (south of which it becomes Pacific Highway) today. Here's what I've got:
http://imgur.com/tgDFjYI
For comparison, one can search "Barnston Island" on google map and scroll down to look.

Notes:
(1) Traffic heading from TCH W to 15S uses the new ramp from TCH W to Golden Ears Way W, then loop back to 15S. Heading from 15N to TCH E, one will turn right onto GEW E then use the ramp from there to access TCH E. In fact, now that I think about it, I should have closed the intersection of GEW with 180th Street altogether, and join the 2 sections of 96 Avenue west of the cloverleaves.
(2) (IMO) The proximity between GEW and TCH makes weaving inevitable unless a 2+2+2+2 express-collector system be employed on that segment of Pacific Highway. I think ssiguy will love that idea.
(3) I wasn't able to include SFPR @ 104 Avenue (Golden Ears Connector) in the picture. (4) I tried drawing things to scale but probably did not.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.

Last edited by Dengler Avenue; Jul 7, 2019 at 3:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2019, 7:04 PM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
Drove over the Alex Fraser Saturday July 27 to check out the shrunken lanes and the new speed limit. Honestly you can barely tell the lanes are shrunken. No different than the widths on the second narrows. Oh and no one in my lanes throughout the length of the bridge was doing 70. Not even the 340 bus. What a joke the government is with their nanny stateism.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 2:46 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
Drove over the Alex Fraser Saturday July 27 to check out the shrunken lanes and the new speed limit. Honestly you can barely tell the lanes are shrunken. No different than the widths on the second narrows. Oh and no one in my lanes throughout the length of the bridge was doing 70. Not even the 340 bus. What a joke the government is with their nanny stateism.
Not even the bus

Speed limit on Second Narrows is also 70 km/h though. Maybe Highway 91’s better built on both ends of the bridge so the speed limit could have stayed at 80 km/h? On the other hand, the lane drops on both sides of Second Narrows are ridiculous...

Also, any thoughts about what I drew (as shown in that link)?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 2:52 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,193
Yeah, I never drive more than 80 km/h over Second Narrows due to its profile but Alex Fraser could certainly remain 90 km/h without any issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 2:59 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,079
This has nothing to do with highway 17
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 3:13 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
This has nothing to do with highway 17
Well once you get down the bridge it’s 91-17 connector, so in a very very remote sense, it sort of does.

But yea any thought about my proposal about 17-15-1-GEW in Barnston? People gave some feedbacks in the BC Highway Construction thread.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2019, 4:44 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,762
The entire SFPR and GE connector should be brought up to complete freeway standards so one could travel the entire route with no stopping. A highway, like a transit line, is only as strong as it's weakest link. Both Twas village interesections should have interchanges so one could travel from the ferry to MR or Hope on full limited access highways.

If BC wasn't so incredibly cheap with highways, it actually wouldn't take much time or money to give the region at least a decent highway system. Overpasses on the MHB, build the Serpentine Exp with interchanges on HWY#15 and not only would it make for far faster travel but also much safer as it would help get the transports off the local roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2019, 6:36 AM
cleowin cleowin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
The entire SFPR and GE connector should be brought up to complete freeway standards so one could travel the entire route with no stopping. A highway, like a transit line, is only as strong as it's weakest link. Both Twas village interesections should have interchanges so one could travel from the ferry to MR or Hope on full limited access highways.

If BC wasn't so incredibly cheap with highways, it actually wouldn't take much time or money to give the region at least a decent highway system. Overpasses on the MHB, build the Serpentine Exp with interchanges on HWY#15 and not only would it make for far faster travel but also much safer as it would help get the transports off the local roads.
How about upgrading many of our local highways to freeway standards, including

1) SFPR
2) Mary Hill Bypass
3) Highway 15 & Highway 10?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2019, 9:10 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2019, 1:00 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,851
I hit those couple bumps when I was back in the area earlier this month.

Was kind of hoping that their repairs were going to be part of the new interchange project, guess not.

We have to wait 3 to 5 years for them to do a permanent fix... In the meantime smoothing and repaving every year...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2019, 4:55 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
Have to love the sparks flying when one of the car lands after launching.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 3:22 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,023
That is not the only area plagued with poor design. There is also a large bump related to the kinder morgan trans mountain crossing east of Patello Bridge. The pipeline is protected by an at grade bridge. There was no densification each side to allow for settling.

Building on Bog is very challenging and old landfills are just being blamed for poor design on a design build project. Look at how much some of the parking lots around town have settled relating to the buildings on piles.

Port MAnn highway 1 has the same issues in a few places also.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 4:40 PM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,273
BC’s famously shoddy highway levelling practices are finally gaining media attention. I’ve been saying for years how no other place in North America has as many sunken dips and bumps in their highway as BC, especially the lower mainland. It comes down to value engineering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2019, 1:07 AM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
I’ve been saying for years how no other place in North America has as many sunken dips and bumps in their highway as BC, especially the lower mainland.
I've wondered that about some of the municipal roads in Burnaby as well, such as Still Creek Drive and the multiple bumps and dips on Gilmore near the Home Depot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2019, 3:19 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
I've wondered that about some of the municipal roads in Burnaby as well, such as Still Creek Drive and the multiple bumps and dips on Gilmore near the Home Depot.
Gilmore stretch in front of home depot is a bridge for a block or so. The problem is that the buildings that were built around that area are set on piles. where as the road is designed to float and bumps and dips show up when utilities cross the roads. As they dont settle or float the same as the road. And add the dewatering used in the buildings to keep the parking dry plus seasonal change in water table.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2019, 3:43 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
I've wondered that about some of the municipal roads in Burnaby as well, such as Still Creek Drive and the multiple bumps and dips on Gilmore near the Home Depot.
Gilmore stretch in front of home depot is a bridge for a block or so. The problem is that the buildings that were built around that area are set on piles. where as the road is designed to float and bumps and dips show up when utilities cross the roads. As they dont settle or float the same as the road. And add the dewatering used in the buildings to keep the parking dry plus seasonal change in water table.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2019, 4:26 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
...I’ve been saying for years how no other place in North America has as many sunken dips and bumps in their highway as BC, especially the lower mainland.
I nearly got some air going eastbound at the 50 km/h speed limit on 16th Avenue near Mt. St. Joseph hospital in Vancouver a couple of days ago. That stretch of 16th Avenue has always been problematic, but there's a particular dip there that seems to have suddenly worsened over the past week or so since I drove it last.

It sounded like my the loaded bike rack was going to tear itself right off the hitch - if I had any doubts about how solid it was they're sure gone now...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2019, 7:11 AM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by cairnstone View Post
Gilmore stretch in front of home depot is a bridge for a block or so. The problem is that the buildings that were built around that area are set on piles. where as the road is designed to float and bumps and dips show up when utilities cross the roads. As they dont settle or float the same as the road. And add the dewatering used in the buildings to keep the parking dry plus seasonal change in water table.
Really? I'd like to learn more about that, are you aware of any good sites that discuss it? I'll search, of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2019, 11:49 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
Really? I'd like to learn more about that, are you aware of any good sites that discuss it? I'll search, of course.
You might have to bring it up in the road infrastructure discussion thread.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2019, 7:59 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
I see they finally patched up the suspension rattling gouges at that ridiculous at grade rail crossing. Wonder how long the semis and other cars gouge it up again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.