http://www.lfpress.com/2016/11/04/pe...erage-its-size
It's been awhile since I've commented much on London as compared to other cities, but now that I've lived in Toronto for over a year I almost feel like Mr. Pearson spoke directly to me when he says in this article:
(Mid-sized cities) do have advantages to offer that citizens in the mega-cities likely wish they could enjoy every day. Think of their hour-long commutes to work, houses priced in the million-dollar range, or the sense of isolation from living alone in a city of millions.
My commute in Toronto is about exactly an hour each way on a good day, and sometimes an hour and a half if there's trouble on the TTC. Buying property is not even a discussion point for me, and even though Toronto has a strong concentration of people in my age range (25-35), there is a strong sense of isolation and I actually have made fewer friends my own age than I did when I lived in a city much smaller than even London. Part of that is due to the amount of time lost every day commuting. (I live in Toronto only because of the requirements of my job.)
London's size is a clear competitive advantage and nobody needs to sell me on that, nor do officials in any other mid-size Ontario city.
London's problem is that it lacks employment opportunities. And businesses aren't choosing to locate in cities like London.
This is purely anecdotal but the company I work for did a review of its office facilities across Canada a couple of years ago, and as a result multiple offices are moving or are being merged over the next several years. One of the primary criteria used by the company to decide on new office locations was access to public transit and an ability to reduce car dependence for employees. The company will be closing several offices in the next couple years in cities, in this province, identified as having poor public transit and high car dependence. (We have not had a physical presence in London in some time, though I believe we did in the past.) This is and will continue to be what is discussed in corporate boardrooms across Canada, and it's not going to be pretty for cities like London that continue to act like it's 1985.
Again, only one company, but I doubt it's the only one thinking along those terms. How can London even compete for new business when national companies are thinking that way?