HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1341  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2017, 5:28 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 2,953
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Great. Get on with it!

I wonder if Siemens will just adapt their high-level Brightline/"Viaggio Comfort" design for low platforms, or if they will engineer an FRA-compliant version of the low-floor "Viaggio Light" design used in Israel.

Level boarding would really make the Hiawatha feel more like a commuter train...

Either way, the new Siemens cars will certainly gel with the new Siemens locomotives much better than the bilevels would have. Sleeker is always better.
They will look better, just like the Brightline trains with a snub nose on the locomotive. But that will not be better relative to the number of seats on a train.
Some math, assuming the newer replacement cars have the same number of seats.
Existing Surfliners coach cars have 89 seats per car.
Existing Amfleet I coach cars have 72 seats per car.
130 x 89 = 11,570
137 x 72 = 9,864
I have no idea exactly how many seats would have been installed in either of the new cars which is why I used the existing cars as examples. Therefore, most likely the new fleet will have 1,706 fewer seats now, the equivalent of 23.6 single level cars with 72 seats.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1342  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2017, 7:17 AM
Mister Uptempo's Avatar
Mister Uptempo Mister Uptempo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
It's official. The planned use of bi-level coaches on Amtrak regional trains in multiple trains is out in favor of single level cars built by Siemens after bi-level crash worthiness proves too difficult to accomplish under FAA guidelines:


Thursday, November 09, 2017

Siemens in, Nippon Sharyo out of Caltrans pact



I for one am thrilled. Not only do they look better, single-level coaches function better considering bi-level coaches are not needed on longer distance routes with no capacity issues.
The NGEC had to alter the weight limitations on the PRIIA 305-003 single-level specifications in order for Siemens' equipment to be compliant.

-Single-level coach weight went from 104,000lbs. to 126,200lbs., an increase of 21%.

-Single-level cafe car weight went from 111,000lbs. to 133,200lbs., an increase of 20%

-Single-level cab/baggage car weight went from 108,000lbs. to 137,200lbs., an increase of 27%.

One wonders if Nippon-Sharyo had been given the same increases in allowable weight whether Rochelle would be turning out new bi-levels today.

Siemens has been angling for a while to convince Amtrak that the Viaggio Comfort should be the Amfleet replacement car. This gives Siemens a chance to showcase the car without Amtrak having to spend a dime to test them out. Plus if an acceptable bi-level design does appear (Amtrak needs a Superliner replacement at some point as well) Caltrans/IDOT/MDOT could sell their single-level cars to Amtrak for long-distance coaches.

Last edited by Mister Uptempo; Nov 10, 2017 at 10:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1343  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2018, 9:47 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Leftist Correctist
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spaceship Earth
Posts: 5,379
__________________
You slip me the cash and I'll slip you the wiener. <><><><><><>IMPEACHMENT NOW!

For me it can be reduced to this: For every personal freedom we gained from the automobile, we lost in social cohesion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1344  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2018, 12:54 PM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
crisis actor
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: under the coin of caesar
Posts: 8,954
still showing 5 hour + travel times for amtrak between st. louis and chicago...ugh, still waiting...
__________________
t h e r e is no C h a o s.... . . . only g r e a t E n e r g y
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1345  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2018, 8:57 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Centropolis View Post
still showing 5 hour + travel times for amtrak between st. louis and chicago...ugh, still waiting...
Unfortunately wasn't supposed to happen until 2019 when UP gets PTC fully operational on the route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1346  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2018, 9:42 PM
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is online now
>~< , QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: South Loop, Chicago
Posts: 452
Yeah I wanna go visit St. Louis sometime, but don't wanna sit on the train for that long.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.