Quote:
Originally Posted by HAMRetrofit
My point is that none of your posts ever have to do with the thread at hand. This is a thread about McMaster innovation park. The previous posts made about Hooters have nothing to do with the topic. Out of respect for everyone here is it possible to engage in a conversation about the topic at hand. I get the sense that you are you here to just stir up shit with other members and it ruins an otherwise constructive discussion.
|
There were multiple posts about Hooters before I ever chimed in. My post was not inflammatory. As for times when I do stir things up, I have admitted on multiple occasions that I taunt raisethehammer at times, but generally not without provocation and I generally and genuinely believe that what I post is much more reasonable and open to response than what he posts.
I do type on topic --- in recent days/weeks, I have made comments about Lime Ridge and Jackson in the Downtown thread, about the suburbs in the Waterdown thread (and gotten hopelessly unfairly blasted for it), about Starbucks in the Locke Street thread, and I have made loads of very much on-topic comments about Harry Stinson --- I just do not have much belief in him. The only thread in which I took things slightly off-topic was when I helped initiate a sidetrack about days of better fries in the Harveys thread --- it was quite innocent and I day to say fun.
raisethehammer never stops railing about parking lots, drive-thrus, one-way roads, ineptness/corruption at city hall, the evils of developers and big business, the crappiness of anything outside the four square kilometres of downtown, etc., etc., in an extremely repetitive, militant, unfriendly, and inflexible/close-minded manner, and yet you do not seem to mind that. I also just noticed a huge off-track convo in which raisethehammer stated that I must be Goldfinger, based on nothing other than the fact that Goldy has similar views to me --- I had nothing to do with getting things off-topic there.
Prev
Linear Mode
