HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > General Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 6:08 PM
omro's Avatar
omro omro is offline
Is now in Hamilton, eh
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,127
Thought this was the more apt place to post this.

While visiting we saw a house that we might be buying, but not necessarily living in immediately.

In the UK you don't have to pay council taxes on empty buildings. Is that true in Hamilton also?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 6:21 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by omro View Post
Thought this was the more apt place to post this.

While visiting we saw a house that we might be buying, but not necessarily living in immediately.

In the UK you don't have to pay council taxes on empty buildings. Is that true in Hamilton also?
do you mean if you buy a house, but don't live in it for a while?
If so, then no, you have to pay the taxes as soon as you buy it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 6:24 PM
omro's Avatar
omro omro is offline
Is now in Hamilton, eh
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
do you mean if you buy a house, but don't live in it for a while?
If so, then no, you have to pay the taxes as soon as you buy it.
A house in an empty and uninhabitable condition (which I'm lead to believe just means no furnishings) is not required to pay council taxes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 7:14 PM
holymoly holymoly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by omro View Post
A house in an empty and uninhabitable condition (which I'm lead to believe just means no furnishings) is not required to pay council taxes.
No such luck here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 7:20 PM
FairHamilton FairHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,768
Here you'll have to pay property taxes no matter if the home is occupied, or not. The vacant home 2 doors north of my house has been vacant for approx. 20 years and they pay taxes every year on the house. Ironically it's actually assessed to be worth more than my inhabited house.

The only way to reduce the taxes is to remove the building (i.e. tear it down).

That's one of the reasons the developers (property squatters) downtown have torn down so many buildings and replaced them with parking lots. It reduced their property taxes in addition to providing them with parking revenue.
__________________
The jobs, stupid!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 7:36 PM
omro's Avatar
omro omro is offline
Is now in Hamilton, eh
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,127
the word... is... bugger.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 7:41 PM
oldcoote's Avatar
oldcoote oldcoote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 627
Quote:
Originally Posted by FairHamilton View Post
That's one of the reasons the developers (property squatters) downtown have torn down so many buildings and replaced them with parking lots. It reduced their property taxes in addition to providing them with parking revenue.
Actually, the trend downtown is simply not to pay your taxes at all, and just go into arrears.

It's not like the city does anything about it anyway. They'd probably give you a grant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 8:11 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
I wouldn't want the UK system where an empty house pays no taxes. Geez, you'd have a bunch of more of them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 8:21 PM
MsMe MsMe is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I wouldn't want the UK system where an empty house pays no taxes. Geez, you'd have a bunch of more of them.
And more then likely being used for drug addicted people hiding out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 10:33 PM
omro's Avatar
omro omro is offline
Is now in Hamilton, eh
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
I wouldn't want the UK system where an empty house pays no taxes. Geez, you'd have a bunch of more of them.
I don't think we have quite the empty house issue, most british property is so over valued it's a total waste to leave it empty! The only areas with large amounts of empty buildings are those areas which are slated for urban renewal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2009, 2:49 PM
FairHamilton FairHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,768
I fought the man

and I WON!!!!!

It wasn't a blow out, and I lost the shutout. But, a win is a win and by my figuring I won by a score of 4 - 1.

My assessment is now going to drop by $22,000 to a point where the assessment is now only $5,000 more then we paid for the house in March 2008 (purchase offer mid-February 2008).

HAPPY FRIDAY!!!!!
__________________
The jobs, stupid!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2009, 3:03 PM
omro's Avatar
omro omro is offline
Is now in Hamilton, eh
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,127
That's a good victory!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2024, 8:23 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,888
It looks like we're heading towards a 7.9% property tax increase. This is better than the proposed double figure of 11-13%.


https://twitter.com/cityofhamilton/

Still, being asked to pay an extra average of $382 is too much. At this point, we need to cut some services. Perhaps cut the service hours of recreational centres.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2024, 11:36 PM
TheHonestMaple's Avatar
TheHonestMaple TheHonestMaple is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,717
The city needs to get back to it's core mandate of maintaining infrastructure. Not the city's responsibility to house, maintain encampments, poets etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2024, 3:07 AM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,263
Couldn't agree more. There are so many layers of municipal services and need to get back to stripped down basics. Zero based budgeting a must.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2024, 3:21 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHonestMaple View Post
The city needs to get back to it's core mandate of maintaining infrastructure. Not the city's responsibility to house, maintain encampments, poets etc.
0.89% of the increase is dedicated to the roads backlog.

The city has a plan to implement a 0.89% increase every year until 2033 when annual roads spending will hit $195 million (vs $65 million last year). So they are getting there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2024, 6:35 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHonestMaple View Post
The city needs to get back to it's core mandate of maintaining infrastructure. Not the city's responsibility to house, maintain encampments, poets etc.
Social services ARE the city's responsibility. As long as senior levels of government ignore the current issues, municipal governments will need to step in.

Maybe police budgets should also not be part of municipal mandates. In fact, like social services, I absolutely believe they should be a provincial responsibility.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2024, 6:37 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
0.89% of the increase is dedicated to the roads backlog.

The city has a plan to implement a 0.89% increase every year until 2033 when annual roads spending will hit $195 million (vs $65 million last year). So they are getting there.
And this is very welcome.

I weigh the personal cost to maintain the suspension in my vehicles against what is spent on roads using property tax revenue. Over the last 3 years I think I'm a net negative!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2024, 4:11 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,603
Yup. The last 2 years have seen 0.5% dedicated roads funding increases, so 0.89% is a new increase this year.

If you look at the capital budget forecast, roads spending really ramps up around 2026. Around then the City is planning to start sinking some serious cash into roads. Main st will get redone, they are planning on widening Rymal, Garner, and Barton (Stoney creek), and a whole whack of resurfacings like King St in the east end, Golf Links Rd, etc.

This year the schedule is for York / Cannon to get done, as well as Wilson’s east end and Upper Wentworth beside Limeridge.

Hamilton has a big hole to dig out of on the roads front but I think we are going to finally start seeing some real progress in the next few years.

The crazy thing is that $195 million is considered the “Sustainable” level of roads spending, and for decades the city spent less than 1/4 of that. It’s a miracle roads aren’t worse than they are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2024, 4:23 PM
TheHonestMaple's Avatar
TheHonestMaple TheHonestMaple is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,717
Do you know when Aberdeen is being redone? It is badly needed. Same with Charlton. Completely neglected, and in some areas almost undrivable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > General Discussion
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.