Quote:
Originally Posted by montréaliste
Yes well, you almost put your finger on it but skimmed over an important fact; the financial crisis.
The financial debacle in the US really effed the property values in areas like Chicago, that is, cities with negative migration. The RE sector in Canada plays by differemt rules and while I agree the prices are too high, the reason for Chicago's relatively tame pricing is tied to the well known fiasco that happened in your market.
|
This doesn't hold water. Even at the peak of the frenzy, Chicago's RE prices were mostly in line with incomes and the local economy. Some bombed out neighborhoods saw tremendous amounts of equity wiped away, but they should never have been commanding the prices they were. Hindsight is 20/20. There are also more people living in Chicagoland today than there were in 2007, even though the region's population growth has stalled in recent years.
I'd suggest that you look into Dallas, Atlanta, and Houston. All three have positive domestic migration and yet offer comparatively cheap housing compared to Toronto. All three cities have an economy comparable to Toronto. All three cities housing costs are climbing, but not by 30 percent per year. Residents of Dallas, Atlanta, and Houston looking to buy will likely see a larger percentage of their income go towards housing than existing homeowners, but it's still within reason compared to their income. That's not at all true of Toronto or Vancouver, where median sales prices are WAAAAAAY above three or four times median incomes. Could the differences in housing costs be because Canada has seen tremendous influx of big Chinese money? There's a lot of nuance, but there's no denying China has played a huge role in shaping the Canadian (Toronto/Vancouver) housing markets.