HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #981  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2019, 4:18 PM
Baronvonellis Baronvonellis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 739
I think LSD could end at Sheridan Rd. at the bend by Calvary cemetery. With new lakefill there's plenty of open space there to make a good outlet to a busy 4 lane road.
There's not alot of traffic on LSD north of Foster now anyway, I don't think it would have to be as wide, maybe 2 lanes each direction as a parkway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
^ It's too bad Loyola was prevented from their lakefill plan back in the 1980s, I think there would be a lot more momentum to complete the missing segments of lakefront park.

A Robert Moses style leader could potentially get the project done by adding back in the LSD extension and relying on the support of drivers... the problem is that there's really no good outlet for the traffic once you hit city limits. Howard or Touhy would be overwhelmed if they extended six lanes up to city limits. Maybe the extension just ends up being a 2-lane urban parkway with a few pulloffs and passing lanes, like Rock Creek Parkway in DC. All pedestrian crossings would be on underpasses. After that, put in a bus lane on Sheridan so everyone benefits.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #982  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2019, 5:01 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baronvonellis View Post
I think LSD could end at Sheridan Rd. at the bend by Calvary cemetery. With new lakefill there's plenty of open space there to make a good outlet to a busy 4 lane road.
There's not alot of traffic on LSD north of Foster now anyway, I don't think it would have to be as wide, maybe 2 lanes each direction as a parkway.
I always thought the lake-fill, road ext would be a boon for the RP. Increase and connect usable beach front. Protect beach from erosion. Create estuary for bird and fish habitat. Increase parkland and recreation. Remove NS through traffic from Sheridan. Decrease express bus times from Evanston and NS. And the big bonus, allow for a pedestiran/bike friendly road diet on Sheridan with better local and express service to loop. And more pleasant dining experiences with less traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #983  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2019, 5:03 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 3,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Apparently the property was transferred from state land to federal land, so the plaintiffs have no chance at winning the case.
By that logic, if I want to redevelop a beloved historic landmark, I can buy the building, sell it to some federal agency, let them tear it down, and sell the land back to me. That's fine right?

Great, let's have more loopholes around preservation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #984  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2019, 5:35 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 16,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
By that logic, if I want to redevelop a beloved historic landmark, I can buy the building, sell it to some federal agency, let them tear it down, and sell the land back to me. That's fine right?

Great, let's have more loopholes around preservation.
You act as if what you described is somehow easy to do.
__________________
I drink, therefore I am
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #985  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2019, 6:02 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Apparently the property was transferred from state land to federal land, so the plaintiffs have no chance at winning the case.
A lot seems to have gotten lost in translation somewhere. There's no state or federal land involved.

The Chicago Park District transferred the land to the city, which plans to transfer it to the Obama Foundation. This is apparently an attempt to circumvent state statute, namely 70 ILCS 1205/10-7:
Any park district owning or holding any real estate is authorized to convey such property to a nongovernmental entity in exchange for other real property of substantially equal or greater value as determined by 2 appraisals of the property and of substantially the same or greater suitability for park purposes without additional cost to such district.
Of course, if the plaintiffs truly had no chance at winning the case, the judge wouldn't have last week allowed it to proceed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #986  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2019, 7:29 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 3,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
You act as if what you described is somehow easy to do.
It doesn't have to be easy. It just has to be profitable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #987  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2019, 6:07 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,027
Lawsuit ruling expected next week. A good summary of the legal situation:

https://www.chicagoreporter.com/ever...enter-lawsuit/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #988  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 5:06 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,409
Judge rules against park advocacy group.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #989  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 5:26 PM
donnie's Avatar
donnie donnie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 478
Free at last........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #990  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 5:33 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 831
WOOHOO!! let's get this thing started!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #991  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 5:36 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 16,855
Well there's that, then....
__________________
I drink, therefore I am
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #992  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 5:44 PM
JK47 JK47 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 312
I doubt the plaintiffs are going to give up so easily. They are zealots after all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #993  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 6:00 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Team Alinghi
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,281
Appeals, the fed. review, Lightfoot wanting to go back to the table for a CBA...
Still might be a while.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #994  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2019, 6:37 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is online now
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brookfield / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Appeals, the fed. review, Lightfoot wanting to go back to the table for a CBA...
Still might be a while.
So dumb. I'm no fan of Obama, and I don't like using park space for the library... but just build it and let's move on!
__________________
1. 111 W 57 - Manhattan, New York - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. 9 Dekalb Ave - Brooklyn, New York - SHoP Architects - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #995  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2019, 9:21 PM
XIII's Avatar
XIII XIII is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Of course, if the plaintiffs truly had no chance at winning the case, the judge wouldn't have last week allowed it to proceed.
Oops!
__________________
"Chicago would do big things. Any fool could see that." - Ernest Hemingway
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #996  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2019, 10:00 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is online now
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,863
^ Huh? Clearly the plantiffs did not have "no chance" at winning. That's what the comment was. Was not a prediction as to ruling.



For the Ten-millionth time, all of this (and it may very well not be over yet) could have been avoided with a smarter, more strategic site selection. While I'm not personally opposed to it going here in the end, it was a dumb, costly decision.
__________________
I lightly engaged in espionage - but it was all very cool and very legal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #997  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2019, 3:48 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,027
Predictions were on page 45.

Plaintiffs are appealing, but I think the only hope now is a reëxamination by the Lightfoot Administration.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:14 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.