go
here to view the publication.
Centre Rank Rating
London 1 785
NewYork 2 765
Hong Kong 3 733
Singapore 4 725
Zurich 5 691
Seoul 6 685
Tokyo 7 684
Chicago 8 683
Geneva 9 682
Toronto 10 681
Boston 11 680
San Fran12 678
Frankfurt 13 677
D.C. 14 672
Sydney 15 670
Vancouver 16 668
Montreal 17 667
Melbourne 18 657
Shanghai 19 656
Jersey 20 654
Osaka 21 650
Dubai 22 648
Calgary 23 647
Luxembourg 24 646
Munich 25 645
Table 3 | The ten centres likely to become more significant
Singapore 42
Shanghai 35
Hong Kong 33
Toronto 20
Sao Paulo 15
Luxembourg 14
Beijing 11
Moscow 11
Mumbai 11
London 7
Table 4 | The ten centres where newoffices will be opened
Singapore 17
Hong Kong 14
London 11
Shanghai 8
Dubai 6
Beijing 5
Mumbai 5
New York 5
Calgary 4
Luxembourg 4
GFCI 12 financial centre profiles
top section: ''Broad and deep/ global leaders'' (no particular order)
Chicago
Frankfurt
Hong Kong
London
New York
Paris
Singapore
Tokyo
Toronto
Zurich
2nd section: Established Transnational (no particular order)
Brussels
Copenhagen
Madrid
Montreal
Munich
Sydney
Vancouver
3rd section: Established players (no particular order)
Calgary
Helsinki
Lisbon
Melbourne
Mexico City
Milan
Prague
Rome
San Francisco
Sao Paulo
Stockholm
Vienna
Mentions
''Other top 50 centres that have done well include
Montreal, Abu Dhabi and Kuala Lumpur''
''New York, Chicago and
Toronto retain their positions in the GFCI top ten and North America has eight centres in the top 17.
Montreal shows the largest rise in the ratings of all the American centres.
Calgary was a new entrant in GFCI 11 and has climbed to 23rd place in GFCI 12. Canada has four centres in the GFCI, all within the top 25.''
''
Toronto has favourable ratings fromthe USA and other Canadian centres.''
''
Montreal is viewed less favourably in Asia/Pacific and Europe than in North America and the offshore centres but is assessed less favourably everywhere else.''
“The Canadian centres are all strong and
Montreal
and
Vancouver are catching up with
Toronto.”
Linear Mode
