HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1041  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 10:52 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,678
The part of Market with cars parked up to it doesn't actually exist yet and it's debatable whether it's a lane or an extension of Market. Either way, I hope they end up walling off the ground floor parking.
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1042  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 10:57 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
I'd take a compromise of just only allowing one cutout to the parking (south entrance) and as said above, just put some sort of barrier to hide the other side of parking (north).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1043  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 11:29 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Ah. You're right. I was looking at it wrong.

It's still not a precedent I think should be allowed but in this odd situation I agree it's not terrible. I had my streets backwards.

It's such an odd piece of property. I'm glad it's getting developed. When it was landlocked by the design of waterfront drive I thought it would be parking forever.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1044  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 11:45 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
I wonder if this will help the chances of all those planned "Cultural District" streetscaping/art elements come to fruition. That was announced years ago. I know the actual sidewalks and that are being replaced, but I wonder if we'll ever get all those arches and decorative elements
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1045  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 12:32 AM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
The area really needs enhanced streetscaping. It is still too rough around the edges, and not charming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1046  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 1:22 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban recluse View Post
The area really needs enhanced streetscaping. It is still too rough around the edges, and not charming.
Yeah, there are too many parts with sidewalks missing or with sidewalks interrupted by laneways that haven't been used in 40 years. There are some blocks that are reasonably well decorated but others are completely bereft of any kinds of streetscaping elements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1047  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 3:22 AM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Yeah, there are too many parts with sidewalks missing or with sidewalks interrupted by laneways that haven't been used in 40 years. There are some blocks that are reasonably well decorated but others are completely bereft of any kinds of streetscaping elements.
Market, including the area where this building is going, plus the south side of James, elgin and Bertha, were all newly streetscspped over the past two summers. I don't think anything further is going to be happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1048  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 4:25 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,785
http://www.winnipeg.ca/publicworks/M...seInfoBrds.pdf

Is this plan not on the go anymore? Seems to be following along.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1049  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 4:33 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Market, including the area where this building is going, plus the south side of James, elgin and Bertha, were all newly streetscspped over the past two summers. I don't think anything further is going to be happening.
Yes, Market itself is in pretty good shape now... I was speaking to the east Exchange generally, and in particular the parts north of Market.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1050  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 5:17 AM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
http://www.winnipeg.ca/publicworks/M...seInfoBrds.pdf

Is this plan not on the go anymore? Seems to be following along.
This is still happening, by next year all the sidewalks in the Exchange will have been redone. However, this is more of a public works/infrastructure project that is tackling more of the functional aspect, and doesn't include all the "decorative" elements that have been on that Cultural District sign on James for a few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1051  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 2:50 PM
TimeFadesAway TimeFadesAway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
It's odd that market is treated as the back side and the lane is the front. Does that middle right image not show surface parking right up to the sidewalk on market?
Am I reading it wrong?
Technically Market ends at Bertha, so the apparent 'continuation' of Market further east is actually a private drive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1052  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 7:23 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
yeah, I was getting James and Market mixed up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1053  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 1:17 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,785
http://www.winnipeg.ca/PublicWorks/M...-28-BOARDS.pdf

Open house for next phase of streetscaping.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1054  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 1:32 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
o good galts going to finaly get a side walk sucks having to walk in the midle of the road around there
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1055  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 3:01 PM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
[QUOTE=bomberjet;7299886]http://www.winnipeg.ca/PublicWorks/M...-28-BOARDS.pdf

This is terrific, but what's irritating is James Ave getting passed over again while we sit and wait for decisions on the parkade which could be years away still.

The street is a mine field and desperately needs a sidewalk on the north side. And with every year that passes without trees, the canopy is further behind other streets. (okay, rant over...)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1056  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 3:35 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Agreed. It is a disgrace, and the impact of the lofts along James is hardly felt because of the condition of the infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1057  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 3:51 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,015
[QUOTE=oftheMoon;7300273]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
http://www.winnipeg.ca/PublicWorks/M...-28-BOARDS.pdf

This is terrific, but what's irritating is James Ave getting passed over again while we sit and wait for decisions on the parkade which could be years away still.

The street is a mine field and desperately needs a sidewalk on the north side. And with every year that passes without trees, the canopy is further behind other streets. (okay, rant over...)
I work here, so I totally get it.

I think they are also considering significantly reducing the width of the James to accommodate more land for the parkade and other pump-house related developments. This complicates things, and they basically need to wait till a development is on the table to do it right and do it once.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1058  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 4:06 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,746
[QUOTE=drew;7300345]
Quote:
Originally Posted by oftheMoon View Post

I work here, so I totally get it.

I think they are also considering significantly reducing the width of the James to accommodate more land for the parkade and other pump-house related developments. This complicates things, and they basically need to wait till a development is on the table to do it right and do it once.
The Pump-house project might get announced in March or so.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1059  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 4:15 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Awesome.

I agree, James is a bit wide in its current form. However, that will allow for generous sidewalks. I can't wait until something happens with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1060  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2016, 4:18 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
A centre boulevard with trees, etc would look great along James; or, yes, wider sidewalks with increased numbers of trees, shrubs, etc lining both sides of James.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.