Quote:
Originally Posted by zilfondel
All of the buildings that front (rear?) Pettygrove Park and the Halprin trails are gated; from the Harrison condos, 200 Market, Cyan, the list goes on. None of those buildings offer public space, they are all private with fences, private pools, private carports, etc. So that isn't anything new.
|
Fair point. I admit it's perhaps unfair to expect this project to offer public space in a way that existing private developments in the area do not. However, at least these other buildings are massed and situated in ways that are careful of the public spaces around them, particularly the pedestrian trails. I don't see any evidence that MGA's lead architect
thought about its relationship to the parks and trails surrounding it (guess it was left entirely to the landscape architect entrusted with 6' strips facing north and east). It's thus revealing that the bordering pedestrian trails are literally effaced (turned into vehicular streets) in the architect's rendering. And I've yet to see a rendering that includes Pettygrove Park, even though it's not only catercorner, it's fully in the building's shadow.
On a more positive note, I agree with you that the facade detailing is interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zilfondel
It should be noted that public space in downtown Portland can be quite problematic due to the transient and homeless population, who will inhabit almost any space that offers shelter unless actively patrolled. This isn't the greatest combination for residential housing...
|
Well, the ground floor of this building will be commercial (supermarket?). Buildings with residential above commercial can of course offer vibrant public space:
here's a powerful example from London, but I think there are good precedents in Portland as well. Anyway, it's sad that homelessness is so pervasive, and disgusting to think that the failure to adequately house our population might be treated as a reasonable pretext for making high-end market-rate apartment buildings more fortresslike. But if the trails and Lovejoy Park have not yet become Hoovervilles, why should we be any more concerned about this lot?