Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa
Unless I'm missing something wouldn't your standard REIT do what you're asking?
|
I thought of a REIT as well, but considering the U.S. as REITs and this was not the method used, I assume the answer would be no. These guys invested hundreds of thousands of dollars into figuring out how successfully do what they did in the United States, and if it was as easy as a REIT I feel like it wouldn't have taken nearly as much time and money.
Maybe my grasp on REITs isn't strong enough, but I would assume that because the investors were not investing in a trust structured like a corporation, and were instead literally buying a share of the piece of property, it didn't work. The other "business" that used the same method of crowd-sourcing as the brothers in the article used for their building, was a play that a group bought shares in as a method of funding.
In short, based on the article, I am under the impression that a REIT would not work. I could be wrong though, given my minimal understanding of REITs.
EDIT: I also believe that the brothers only sold 41% of their building (based on purchasing the property for $850,000 and selling 3500 shares values at $100 each), and in a REIT in the US no more than 50% of the shares can be held by 5 or fewer people.
EDIT 2:As well, I think the whole notion is of a smaller scale than a REIT. Its more aimed to be a way in which a community can come together and, as a group, purchase a building.