HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2019, 3:43 PM
mark0 mark0 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 126
Hows this going to affect the view inbound from ORD on the Kennedy? Its a great vista right now as is allowing you to see the whole of the skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2019, 4:21 PM
Barrelfish Barrelfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 197
Wow! On multiple dimensions:
  • rgarri, your model is incredible
  • Holy cow this is going to be hugely transformative
  • There HAS to be a huge transit component for this thing to work. One metra stop, some bus routes, and a water taxi isn't going to cut it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2019, 4:50 PM
SteelMonkey SteelMonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 344
[QUOTE=rgarri4;8464022]I added the Lincoln Yards to my 3d model with the current proposed heights and man is this project huge. I didn't realize how much this thing looms on the horizon until I modeled it. I can maybe understand how its controversial but I still really hope it gets built. It's like another skyline!

I wasn't able to get textures for all of the towers but it's all speculative anyways. Sorry if the video is jerky. I'm experimenting with a drone mode in the model for the first time.



rgarri4 - Your video "Unbuilt Chicago" is sick! What ifs.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2019, 3:56 PM
bgsrand bgsrand is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
What is that new high rise next to the Sono buildings? Is that the lot that is fenced off there?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2019, 9:54 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
The reality is that we are approaching the end of a cycle and neither Lincoln Yards nor The 78 nor the River District (everyone keeps forgetting that one, also a huge project ) will really get going until the next cycle. If DPI moves forward, probably The 78 will have the biggest head start since DPI is an institutional project and less vulnerable to market cycles.

It’s still a huge unknown what office tenants, if any, Sterling Bay can land at Lincoln Yards. Prospective office tenants will be just as wary as we are about the limited transit access, and the market for rentals will likely slow down quite a bit by the time LY gets its zoning and TIF approved. So that leaves... condos? Belgravia has already launched sales on condos at Triangle Square nearby. Will be interesting to see how that performs.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2019, 12:40 AM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronWright View Post
We are 6 years in to Wolf Point
Actually. we will be 46 years in to Wolf Point in May
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2019, 3:08 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrelfish View Post
Wow! On multiple dimensions:
  • rgarri, your model is incredible
  • Holy cow this is going to be hugely transformative
  • There HAS to be a huge transit component for this thing to work. One metra stop, some bus routes, and a water taxi isn't going to cut it
While a subway would be awesome, I wonder if this isn't the sort of thing that wouldn't be perfect for a "sky tram" type thing?

From the Western Blue Line to Damen and Cortland to the Metra station with a couple stops in LY, to Fullerton station the east sides of the Children's development, and then maybe to the LP Zoo.

It'd be good for LY but also for linking east LP to the Blue Line for airport runs and suburbanites coming in for the Lake and Zoo,etc.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2019, 8:08 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
^That’s a very interesting idea. One unexpected issue I noted on La Paz’s Green Line is that it goes right over the top of rich people’s houses on the hilltops en route to Irpawi, and Teleférico passengers have a view right into their swimming pools, patios, and bedrooms. I’m sure there must have been fierce protests, and you can imagine the routing problem when going over Chicago’s wealthiest neighborhoods. Although I suppose we could always make the gondola windows turn translucent when they go past certain blocks, the way Singapore does on the Bukit Panjang LRT Line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2019, 4:52 PM
pullmanman pullmanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 49
Don't know if this is already posted, but there's a Chigov.com article that came out Friday with links to the planned development applications for Lincoln Yards North and South.

I flipped through them and it looks like there are some images that haven't been linked here yet too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2019, 9:58 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
^That’s a very interesting idea. One unexpected issue I noted on La Paz’s Green Line is that it goes right over the top of rich people’s houses on the hilltops en route to Irpawi, and Teleférico passengers have a view right into their swimming pools, patios, and bedrooms. I’m sure there must have been fierce protests, and you can imagine the routing problem when going over Chicago’s wealthiest neighborhoods. Although I suppose we could always make the gondola windows turn translucent when they go past certain blocks, the way Singapore does on the Bukit Panjang LRT Line.
It looks like Mexico City's recent arial tram and Colombia's recent transit ones ended up costing $25-30 million per mile, including stations about every km, within the past decade. Even if it cost four times that much in Chicago, that would mean roughly $300 million from Western Blue Line to Fullerton Red/Brown/Purple.

Isn't the developer at the 78 paying most of the $300 million for the Red Line 15th Street station? Why can't the Lincoln Yards developer pay a similar amount to do something people have wanted for decades - a grade-separated, cross-town link from Bucktown to Lincoln Park. Then the City or State could fund the last mile to push it to Lincoln Park for access to the lakefront, LP Zoo, and the Nature Museum.

It seems to be that, while I'm sure there are some complexities, on the surface it sounds like exactly what's needed. To partially address the privacy concerns, it could be routed along the 606, where neighbors are already accommodating potential privacy loss. It's a quiet mode of transport, so it wouldn't disrupt the park, it lessens the need to acquire private lands, and further improves transit access to the 606. It would also provide a little suggestion of extending the trams west to the Western terminus of the 606, and maybe South from there into Humboldt Park for improved access in the future, if it proves a success.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]

Last edited by emathias; Feb 12, 2019 at 10:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2019, 11:33 PM
KOgc KOgc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 52
Any inside info on the TIF voting today?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2019, 9:04 PM
go go white sox go go white sox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by KOgc View Post
Any inside info on the TIF voting today?
https://chicago.curbed.com/2019/2/20...-district-vote
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2019, 5:03 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,419
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/comm...key-vote-nears

March 05, 2019 09:15 AM updated an hour ago

Lincoln Yards adds affordable housing as key vote nears
City officials have reached a deal with Sterling Bay that could help the $6 billion megaproject move forward.

Danny Ecker

Quote:
Sterling Bay will add more on-site affordable housing to its plan for Lincoln Yards, a key change that could help the Chicago developer win city approval for the $6 billion megaproject before Mayor Rahm Emanuel leaves office in May.

Sterling Bay is looking to clear a hurdle toward that goal later this week when it presents its vision for 55 acres along the North Branch of the Chicago River to the City Council's Zoning Committee. The developer has doubled the previously planned amount of affordable residential units that would be within the boundaries of Lincoln Yards, according to Ald. Brian Hopkins, whose 2nd Ward includes the Lincoln Yards site. The move is meant to meet demands of low-income housing advocates and several Chicago aldermen, including Zoning Committee chair Ald. James Cappleman, 46th.

Under the latest version of the plan, which city officials will announce later this morning, Lincoln Yards would include 600 affordable housing units on-site, or 10 percent of the total number of residential units Sterling Bay has proposed.

The previous version, which was approved Jan. 24 by the Chicago Plan Commission, called for 300 affordable units on-site. Under that model, Sterling Bay would have met the rest of the city's affordable housing requirement through a combination of building such housing within 3 miles of Lincoln Yards and paying $39 million to the city's low-income housing trust fund to benefit affordable housing elsewhere in the city.

Hopkins said other tweaks to building height and density guidelines for Lincoln Yards are being discussed and could be announced as soon as tomorrow.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2019, 8:20 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
I assume the plan for parks and transit is still

Hope Really Hard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2019, 8:53 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 969
I pray for 100% affordable housing and 100% parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2019, 1:35 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
What in the f**kety f**k?
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2019, 1:41 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Doesn’t the CTU shitshow want developments like this to generate property tax revenue and hence help pay for their benefits and pensions?
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2019, 1:44 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Doesn’t the CTU shitshow want developments like this to generate property tax revenue and hence help pay for their benefits and pensions?
That's the thing, Lincoln Yards won't generate property tax revenue because it will all be diverted through the TIF to pay for local infrastructure. If the plan for Lincoln Yards evaporates tomorrow, then the two TIF districts expire and all that land goes full back on the tax rolls.

There's very little for CTU to like about Lincoln Yards... but for the rest of us, this will deliver much needed new infrastructure to a congested part of the city as well as parkland and more housing.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2019, 1:49 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
That's the thing, Lincoln Yards won't generate property tax revenue because it will all be diverted through the TIF to pay for local infrastructure. If the plan for Lincoln Yards evaporates tomorrow, then the two TIF districts expire and all that land goes full back on the tax rolls.

There's very little for CTU to like about Lincoln Yards... but for the rest of us, this will deliver much needed new infrastructure to a congested part of the city as well as parkland and more housing.
Well there will be no property tax revenue to speak of at all if this project gets shot down. I’m talking future revenue after the TIF expires, which would occur eventually.

Furthermore, it’s kind of ironic that TIFs like this to fund infrastructure investments wouldn’t be needed if the city wasn’t diverting so much of its revenue to pensions like that of the CTU.

Of all people, I figured school teachers would understand their math a bit better.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2019, 3:18 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Well there will be no property tax revenue to speak of at all if this project gets shot down.
Seriously? You don't think 55 acres of vacant land in between Bucktown and Lincoln Yards, freed of its PMD restrictions, would ever be developed without hefty city subsidies?

And what the hell does Chicago Public School pension payments have to do with City of Chicago infrastructure funding? CPS money can't be used for building streets and sewers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.