Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerman
Of course the question “Does Atlanta's metro size balance it out as a premiere US city?” is not one that can really be answered. We have no definition of what is a premiere US city. We don’t know what the word “balance” means in the question. I don’t think this is anything beyond the fun of a bar discussion on what is the meaning of life. So we are free to throw out whatever beliefs, facts, or opinions that we like and have a reasonable discussion and conclude whatever we conclude.
|
To me (in my mind) there is a difference between a 'premier' city and a 'world class' city.
To me, in my own head, only three, maybe four cities in the USA actually meet the 'premier' city category.... being NY, LA, and Chicago, aaaannnddd maybe DC.
Other than that I wouldn't classify any other metros as 'premier'.
To me the word 'premier' refers to something like an opening act, something that changed the world. Have other US cities changed cultures or influenced the world in one way or another? Sure. But nothing like NY or LA... and the other two to a degree.
San Francisco may have influenced the world by technology, so one could argue that may very well be 'premier'.
Most other US metros have had a much larger influence on domestic culture/influence to some degree. For example, Denver with outdoor culture/ Vegas with sin
/ Atlanta with the rising of Martin Luther King Jr./ Etc. Etc. Etc.
Now that being said, just because I don't believe many other US metros are 'Premier', doesn't mean that I don't think they aren't world class.
I believe Atlanta, Denver, Dallas, Miami, Houston, etc, etc are definitely world class. But definitely not up their with the dominate 'premier' cities.
Before everyone jumps down my throat, remember, these are my opinions.