Sigh.
This caught my eye... it's reflective of what's wrong with the mentality that governs OC Transpo.
From the middle page, penultimate paragraph:
...province-wide age rules used in the Presto system require that the OC Transpo cut-off for child fares be increased from age 11 to age 12. While this change has minimal impact on fare revenue, significant effort will be needed to communicate the change to riders.
Clearly.
The scene: sometime in the distant future a few years after the Presto card is introduced a frazzled mother of a newly turned-12 year old boy walks up to the ticket wicket at Lincoln Fields with boy in tow
OC Transpo wicket jockey: "How may I help you, ma'am?" [ok, perhaps they're not always that friendly, but suspend your disbelief]
Frazzled Mother: "My son here has just turned 12. He needs to have his Presto card updated."
OCT WJ: "Actually, ma'am, the fare policy changed with the introduction of the Presto card. Child fares now apply up 12 years old, not 11 as they used to, so he won't need his card updated for another year."
Mother: "That's just great. You mean to say I came to this modernist hell hole in the middle of a field for nothing? I tell you what OC Transpo needs... what you need is a significant effort to communicate this change to riders... that's what!"
OCT WJ: "Sorry ma'am. I'll pass that on. Will there be anything else I can do for you?"
Mother: "Yes, you can top up these cards. I let them drain out before bringing him here to get his card updated."
Honestly, how difficult is it going to be for OC Transpo agents to inform parents
when they get their kid a Presto card for the first time to let them know that it's good until they're 12? Moreover, whether it's good til they're 11 or 12, the parents are going to have to be told anyway that they'll need to have the card changed or updated upon reaching the maximum age, so it's not actually any more effort if the maximum age is 12 than if it was 11.