Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
^ I find it hard to believe you couldn't turn a profit on an outdoor game with somewhat reasonable ticket prices. Let's say the average price per seat is $100, which allows for a range of ticket prices from say, $50 to $175, which most would consider pricy but not altogether absurd. 20,000 seats yields $2,000,000. I cannot imagine you couldn't make money on a junior game, even if it is outdoors, with 2 million in revenue!
|
Probably could. But if QCSE's mindset was turning a profit, it changes everything... they needed to figure out what the primary goal was.
Profits in these outdoors games - even at the NHL level -
are far from guaranteed due to the huge up-front costs (
another cost is starting up the stadium... as a taxpayer, I want to ensure the cost of de-winterizing, and re-winterizing the stadium are entirely the Pats' responsibility). The Flames hosted the Winter Classic in front of 40,000 people at McMahon (tickets between $110-250 in 2011). That was easily $5million in revenue - and they were still worried about breaking even. And that's the NHL - the Pats overplayed their hand... expecting to sell tickets to a junior game (and an NHL old-timers/all-star game) at prices similar to an NHL game?
Price point was everything in this failure. The Pats might point to concerns about weather, rink conditions, etc... but the fact is tickets were too expensive, and there wasn't any interest was what sank the event. As I initially said, the braintrust that pitched this strategy was delusional.
Update:
the Pats *may* try it again, but with an NHL game. Story implies the ticket price was essentially break-even ("
"The price point was bang on from the perspective of: The cost to put on the event is the cost,” said Marquart").