HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast > Atlanta


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2009, 7:24 PM
DetroitMan DetroitMan is offline
Detroiter4life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Back home in Georgia!
Posts: 4,061
Toll tunnel under east Atlanta a top DOT proposal

Toll tunnel under east Atlanta a top DOT proposal
By Ariel Hart The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The toll road tunnel proposal is for real. A controversial concept to link Ga. 400 to I-675 by digging under east Atlanta has for a couple of years found its way onto some policymakers’ wish lists. But this month it found itself someplace better: Among the state Department of Transportation’s top toll projects pitched to private investors and road-building companies.
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/toll...lid=daylf_artr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2010, 4:04 AM
Uptowngirl Uptowngirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 320
That is beyond stupid.
Which is of course why the GDOT will push for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2010, 3:06 AM
cybele cybele is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,303
Well it looks like GDOT is moving forward with this project.

GDOT to discuss ‘intown interstate,’ other projects with residents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2010, 5:45 AM
CT340 CT340 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 12
I wouldn't put too much worry into that though...

Reed against Atlanta tunnel

By Ariel Hart

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed told a meeting of Intown Atlanta neighborhood leaders Tuesday night that his opposition to a road tunnel under east Atlanta was "steadfast and absolute" from the moment he heard of it........

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/reed...el-267999.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 12:12 AM
atl2phx's Avatar
atl2phx atl2phx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT340 View Post
I wouldn't put too much worry into that though...

Reed against Atlanta tunnel

By Ariel Hart

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed told a meeting of Intown Atlanta neighborhood leaders Tuesday night that his opposition to a road tunnel under east Atlanta was "steadfast and absolute" from the moment he heard of it........

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/reed...el-267999.html
it's great that reed is against the tunnel, but at the end of the day, i get the feeling the GDOT can pretty much do whatever they want.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 4:41 AM
cabasse's Avatar
cabasse cabasse is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: atalanta
Posts: 4,175
^
DOT: Atlanta opposition to tunnel does not kill idea

State Department of Transportation leaders said this week that city opposition to a proposed road tunnel under east Atlanta does not kill the idea, at least not yet.

http://www.ajc.com/news/dot-atlanta-...to-268690.html

if this freeway goes through in any shape, i hope it's a tunnel.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 1:29 PM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,231
I'd be fine with just extending 675 north to the southern point of the S-curve at I-20. There's enough clear land for that and it might spur development in southeast Atlanta and south DeKalb. But connecting it with 400 via a tunnel sounds more practical than it really is.
__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 4:50 PM
smArTaLlone smArTaLlone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail Claimore View Post
I'd be fine with just extending 675 north to the southern point of the S-curve at I-20. There's enough clear land for that and it might spur development in southeast Atlanta and south DeKalb. But connecting it with 400 via a tunnel sounds more practical than it really is.
I don't think it sounds practical at all to spend the enourmous cost of building a tunnel just to essentially widen the "connector". To me its bizarre that the GDOT is even seriously considering this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 6:29 PM
cybele cybele is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,303
Well the GDOT has to worry about connectivity for the state and the entire Atlanta area. It seems like people in the city limits start fussing every time somebody wants to widen a road in but how in the heck are folks out in the suburbs supposed to get to the airport?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2010, 10:23 PM
atl2phx's Avatar
atl2phx atl2phx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by smArTaLlone View Post
I don't think it sounds practical at all to spend the enourmous cost of building a tunnel just to essentially widen the "connector". To me its bizarre that the GDOT is even seriously considering this.
the tunnel proposal is ridiculous. i will be amazed if the ARC weighs in on this with a positive response when they finally do.

essentially, this project would serve the needs of a wealthy northside, and even then, it would likely only serve a small segment of that group (i.e. those headed to central atlanta AND willing to pay $16 in tolls daily)....WTF, 400 was built to serve this group....expand 400 and then burrow underneath the downtown connector.

isn't it true that most of the traffic in the suburbs is inter-county, inter-suburb and not headed to the center city of atlanta. if so, i would imagine the $/mile it will cost to build this would go much further toward building the northern arc, BRT along the northern perimeter or toll lanes and hov lanes along the northern perimeter.

crazy ass GDOT serving up more cars, more carbon and more special interests.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 1:17 AM
netdragon netdragon is offline
I've been around
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 203
A complete and utter waste of money, at least right now. For through traffic, this is what 285 is for. They can build toll lanes on 285 South end. They can build a tunnel under the connector for through traffic. There's no reason they need to cut through the East end. It will destroy the character, since they will build above ground in any areas that don't have the resources to fight it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 3:14 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,212
I guess GDOT must have done some regional study that determined this was necessary?

Where and when did this whole thing start?

Last edited by llamaorama; Jan 8, 2010 at 3:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 3:23 AM
Rail Claimore's Avatar
Rail Claimore Rail Claimore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by netdragon View Post
A complete and utter waste of money, at least right now. For through traffic, this is what 285 is for. They can build toll lanes on 285 South end. They can build a tunnel under the connector for through traffic. There's no reason they need to cut through the East end. It will destroy the character, since they will build above ground in any areas that don't have the resources to fight it.
I have a theory... I bet if you took out one lane in each direction on the connector and replaced it with a barrier, separating each direction into local and express (with express exits only at the existing HOV exits and I-20), traffic flow would actually improve.
__________________
So am I supposed to sign something here?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 3:42 AM
cybele cybele is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by llamaorama View Post
I guess GDOT must have done some regional study that determined this was necessary?

Where and when did this whole thing start?
Well the first I heard of it it came from something called the Reason Foundation.

http://reason.org/news/show/126861.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 6:02 AM
GTviajero81 GTviajero81 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybele View Post
Well the GDOT has to worry about connectivity for the state and the entire Atlanta area. It seems like people in the city limits start fussing every time somebody wants to widen a road in but how in the heck are folks out in the suburbs supposed to get to the airport?
\


Uhhh....TAKE THE DAMN TRAIN!

Seriously?! There is no scheduled flight that leaves after 0100h and a literal handful that leave prior to 0600h.

NO EXCUSE!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 6:06 AM
GTviajero81 GTviajero81 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail Claimore View Post
I have a theory... I bet if you took out one lane in each direction on the connector and replaced it with a barrier, separating each direction into local and express (with express exits only at the existing HOV exits and I-20), traffic flow would actually improve.
Smart idea...this is what is done in Canada. For example, in Toronto these are called Collector/Express Lanes. Every few kilometres one can exit from the Express lanes to the Collector lanes to take an exit. All the exits would still be in place here but those who are only travelling through would stay in the leftmost two or three lanes whilst local travellers would stay in the rightmost lanes. And for a city as big a Toronto that has more people and less freeways that we do, they same to have a pretty good handle on their traffic situation.

And before anyone says anything, their transit system is just as limited as ours.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 6:36 PM
ATLaffinity ATLaffinity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybele View Post
Well the GDOT has to worry about connectivity for the state and the entire Atlanta area. It seems like people in the city limits start fussing every time somebody wants to widen a road in but how in the heck are folks out in the suburbs supposed to get to the airport?
Move into the fucking city.

We don't care if it's convenient for people to get to the airport.

I take the train with a preschooler. It puts me IN THE TERMINAL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 7:44 PM
cybele cybele is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLaffinity View Post
Move into the fucking city.

We don't care if it's convenient for people to get to the airport.

I take the train with a preschooler. It puts me IN THE TERMINAL.
Well what works for some doesn't necessarily work for all. Not everybody wants to deal with the high price of real estate, the high taxes, the crime and the school situation. A lot of us have pets and gardens and we need space for all that instead of being crammed into some highrise with no closets or a basement. We also love our trees and greenspace.

That doesn't mean we don't need to get to the airport however. You would have to think that the vast majority of Atlantans who use the airport live outside the city limits. If it only relied on people who lived inside the city limits the dang thing most likely would have never been built and it sure wouldn't have gotten to be as big a deal as it is today.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 8:50 PM
sabino86's Avatar
sabino86 sabino86 is offline
Apathetic...and Loving It
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail Claimore View Post
I have a theory... I bet if you took out one lane in each direction on the connector and replaced it with a barrier, separating each direction into local and express (with express exits only at the existing HOV exits and I-20), traffic flow would actually improve.
That was actually the original plan of the "Freeing the Freeways" expansion program 25 years ago, but GDOT was lazy and made them general-purpose lanes...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2010, 9:35 PM
atl2phx's Avatar
atl2phx atl2phx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybele View Post
Well what works for some doesn't necessarily work for all. Not everybody wants to deal with the high price of real estate, the high taxes, the crime and the school situation. A lot of us have pets and gardens and we need space for all that instead of being crammed into some highrise with no closets or a basement. We also love our trees and greenspace.

That doesn't mean we don't need to get to the airport however. You would have to think that the vast majority of Atlantans who use the airport live outside the city limits. If it only relied on people who lived inside the city limits the dang thing most likely would have never been built and it sure wouldn't have gotten to be as big a deal as it is today.
well it's a cost benefit trade off then.

you choose to live in the suburbs, therefore you recognize it's going to be more difficult and require more planning to get to the airport.

WHY SHOULD THOSE WHO LIVE IN THE CITY HAVE TO CARRY THE BURDEN OF MAKING IT CONVENIENT FOR SUBURBANITES TO GET TO THE AIRPORT?

gimme an effing break.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast > Atlanta
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.