I know this is a little crazy, but I figure if the city is willing to spend the money on the Glenmore/37th interchange, then why not think about the Glenmore/Sarcee one too? (Just a little mental exercise)
I wanted a solution that only required 1 bridge, (like the recycled one they used on the G/37 project) and this is all I could come up with:
So WB Glenmore to NB Sarcee is a bypass as mentioned on the last page. The SB Sarcee to WB Highway 8 works as it does now, as a merge.
The SB Sarcee to EB Glenmore is over the bridge, the WB Glenmore to WB Highway 8 lanes are under the bridge.
The strangest movement is the WB Highway 8 to NB Sarcee. Since I wanted as little infrastructure as possible, I though that the lane could head north over the bridge (barrier between the lanes, as the flow of the lanes is reversed to what you would normally expect) and then looping under the bridge to join with Sarcee.
I realise this is probably not a great idea, and that it is based on doing it as cheaply as possible, but there you go, just a thought!