HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2009, 5:44 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls View Post
I think it has less to do with 'largest' corporations and more to do with 'corporations that like to shell out cash for hockey games'.
Exactly, some of my young delusional Winnipeg forum comrades feel that Winnipeg based corporations will be jumping over each other to buy a box if and when the NHL returns. They also fail to realize that of those said 32 + 3=35, The Canadian Wheat Board, MB Hydro, MLCC, MPIC, Manitoba Lotteries, Manitoba Pork Marketing and the majority of the others won't be buying any type of box unless it's made of cardboard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 2:24 AM
Pegger5 Pegger5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Proud to be from "The Peg"
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Exactly, some of my young delusional Winnipeg forum comrades feel that Winnipeg based corporations will be jumping over each other to buy a box if and when the NHL returns. They also fail to realize that of those said 32 + 3=35, The Canadian Wheat Board, MB Hydro, MLCC, MPIC, Manitoba Lotteries, Manitoba Pork Marketing and the majority of the others won't be buying any type of box unless it's made of cardboard.
I am most likely older and more experienced than you but I wont go there.

Do you not have a comment of why there is a waiting list for boxes today at MTS Centre and also how do you explain Ottawa selling out boxes??

Saying that, you would be surprised at what money they will spend on marketing for their companies and yes that may include rink board signage or yes, even boxes... Besides, you only named 6 companies of which have many high paid employees. If you use the same rules for Edmonton then you can eliminate EPCOR (owned by City of Edmonton) , ATB, Alberta Lotteries, WCB, National Energy Board etc.etc
http://www.financialpost.com/magazin...porations.html

It has become obvious to many on here that you think you are a realist but the fact is you may still be living or thinking about the Winnipeg economy in the early 90's..

Don't you think Chipman and Thomson would know the answer of corporate support before they buy a team? Can you answer that? or do you think they are dumb business men?

Maybe this will help in your research.
http://www.manitobabusinessmagazine.com/
__________________
http://www.financialpost.com/magazine/fp500/list.html
TOP 800 -Winnipeg: 32 + 3 subsidiaries = 35
----------Edmonton: 25 + 1 subsidiary = 26
----------Quebec City: 16 + 2 subsidiaries = 18
----------Ottawa: 15 + 1 subsidiary = 16

Last edited by Pegger5; Dec 10, 2009 at 2:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #783  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 3:08 AM
P&M40BELOW's Avatar
P&M40BELOW P&M40BELOW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Exactly, some of my young delusional Winnipeg forum comrades feel that Winnipeg based corporations will be jumping over each other to buy a box if and when the NHL returns. They also fail to realize that of those said 32 + 3=35, The Canadian Wheat Board, MB Hydro, MLCC, MPIC, Manitoba Lotteries, Manitoba Pork Marketing and the majority of the others won't be buying any type of box unless it's made of cardboard.
The point is the people that would be acquiring a team have already decided that the support is there; and are moving forward. Maybe some people don't remember but at the time that the Jets left, most opinions were that Calgary and Edmonton wouldn't be far behind; In fact initially both held on by the skin of their teeth. If teams had actually left Calgary and Edmonton then I am sure those same cities would be having the same discussion today; wondering if they could once again support an NHL team. Edmonton is not so different from Winnipeg; in fact Winnipeg does have more head offices to support the boxes. Yes it's true that there is a substantial waiting list for boxes at the MTS Centre.

By the way I don't believe that ownership wants the "Jets" back. I believe that they will get an NHL team by way of expansion or relocation; but that team will be called the "Moose".

Go Moose!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #784  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 3:53 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by P&M40BELOW View Post
The point is the people that would be acquiring a team have already decided that the support is there; and are moving forward. Maybe some people don't remember but at the time that the Jets left, most opinions were that Calgary and Edmonton wouldn't be far behind; In fact initially both held on by the skin of their teeth. If teams had actually left Calgary and Edmonton then I am sure those same cities would be having the same discussion today; wondering if they could once again support an NHL team. Edmonton is not so different from Winnipeg; in fact Winnipeg does have more head offices to support the boxes. Yes it's true that there is a substantial waiting list for boxes at the MTS Centre.

By the way I don't believe that ownership wants the "Jets" back. I believe that they will get an NHL team by way of expansion or relocation; but that team will be called the "Moose".

Go Moose!!

Do I have to tell you what one of the MAJOR reasons is that Calgary, Edmonton and Ottawa still have hockey teams, it's because of the increase in value of the Canadian dollar. It was pretty tough to pay a US based salary on a $.62 Canadian dollar.

And do you think Winnipeg can sustain enough fan support with a city of only 750K and relatively low average salaries, that the cities of Calgary, Edmonton and Ottawa all with over a million people and a lot higher average salaries get?

Saying that there is a waiting list for bargain basement priced boxes at the MTS Centre and the reality of selling those same boxes at the same price or higher (higher because of the small seating capacity of the MTS Centre) than what they go for in Calgary is questionable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #785  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 4:02 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,284
Winnipeg has household incomes slightly above average for Canada I think it was viking that posted that stats in the past...but don't let that stop your parade of doom.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #786  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 4:05 AM
DowntownWpg's Avatar
DowntownWpg DowntownWpg is offline
The Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 511
Just a general comment... don't get your hopes up as long as Bettman is still around, you'll just set yourself up for heartbreak. Throughout his time as NHL commissioner, both during and post-Jets, Bettman has consistently played politics with or outright screwed Winnipeg. IMO, believing that Bettman has changed is merely wishful thinking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #787  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 4:15 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Winnipeg has household incomes slightly above average for Canada I think it was viking that posted that stats in the past...but don't let that stop your parade of doom.

Average household income of 154 Canadian cities ranked Winnipeg 74th in 2009. That same ranking had Calgary at 7th place, Edmonton at 21st and Ottawa at 22nd. Incidentally Hamilton was ranked 43rd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #788  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 4:18 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,284
Right...and we were still above average. The statistic also showed that we were below average in the past.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #789  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 7:17 AM
ILYR's Avatar
ILYR ILYR is offline
ILYR
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 518
There are now 10 teams with attendance (not necessarily paid) less than the MTS centre. They are:

(Taken from http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/attendance)
Columbus 15004
Anaheim 14835
Florida 14489
Tampa Bay 14470
Carolina 14410
Colorado 14390
Atlanta 13511
Nashville 13409
NY Islanders 12485
Phoenix 9774

8 of them are the new southern expansion teams and are sitting at around 70-80% capacity (Phoenix 55% capacity).

The 6 Canadian teams:
Montreal 21273
Calgary 19289
Toronto 19240
Vancouver 18810
Ottawa 18023
Edmonton 16839

With the exception of Ottawa (97.6% capacity) all Canadian teams are at 100+% capacity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #790  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 5:32 PM
Keng Keng is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Average household income of 154 Canadian cities ranked Winnipeg 74th in 2009. That same ranking had Calgary at 7th place, Edmonton at 21st and Ottawa at 22nd. Incidentally Hamilton was ranked 43rd.
Disposable income would be a much more useful figure, would it not?
__________________
Ken

Photo Gallery: kengillespie.com
My Photo Blog
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #791  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 6:18 PM
chrisallard5454's Avatar
chrisallard5454 chrisallard5454 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
here are some figures on Winnipeg's income compared to disposable income over the last 10 years. There is also a comparison to Manitoba and the rest of Canada.
Though I would not hold this info. to close to heart as it was produced by DestinationWinnipeg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #792  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 6:21 PM
chrisallard5454's Avatar
chrisallard5454 chrisallard5454 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #793  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 10:06 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keng View Post
Disposable income would be a much more useful figure, would it not?
Well since you put it out there here are the rankings for household discretionary income: Calgary 1st, Edmonton 7th, Ottawa 24th and Winnipeg 79th. Hamilton ranks 51st. Winnipeg actually ranks worse in this category than household income, nice try!

Don't think I'm down on the NHL returning because I'm not, it's just that the reality of Winnipeg's demographics economically would make it difficult.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #794  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 10:17 PM
Keng Keng is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 214
I'm not trying anything, just voicing an opinion that cost of living is a factor. You're far to paranoid.

I would never try to convince someone with such a pessimistic and negative view on practically everything in this city. Call me a comrade, I guess.
__________________
Ken

Photo Gallery: kengillespie.com
My Photo Blog
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #795  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 10:24 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Wo, wo, wo! Because I think the level of public funding ( my tax dollars) is far too great for the CMHR and what it's return will be and that I question whether the NHL can work in Winnipeg, I'm some sort of grim reaper, give me a frickin break. Keep drinking the pink Kool-aid Ken! I guess when confronted with facts some people turn to name calling and stereotyping!

Last edited by rrskylar; Dec 10, 2009 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #796  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 10:39 PM
Keng Keng is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Exactly, some of my young delusional Winnipeg forum comrades feel that Winnipeg based corporations will be jumping over each other to buy a box if and when the NHL returns. They also fail to realize that of those said 32 + 3=35, The Canadian Wheat Board, MB Hydro, MLCC, MPIC, Manitoba Lotteries, Manitoba Pork Marketing and the majority of the others won't be buying any type of box unless it's made of cardboard.
I don't even know what you are talking about! You seem to think I was trying to prove something to you.

My little post only stipulated, I believed disposable income was a more accurate assessment of the average Winnipeg families ability to afford the NHL; for all posters, I wasn't singling anybody out. For some reason you think I was targeting you. Not the case, in fact I think you're point is valid and concerns me as well as to whether the NHL can work in Winnipeg. You're views on the CMHR are irrelevant.

I only drink Guinness.
__________________
Ken

Photo Gallery: kengillespie.com
My Photo Blog
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #797  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 11:47 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILYR View Post
There are now 10 teams with attendance (not necessarily paid) less than the MTS centre. They are:

(Taken from http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/attendance)
Columbus 15004
Anaheim 14835
Florida 14489
Tampa Bay 14470
Carolina 14410
Colorado 14390
Atlanta 13511
Nashville 13409
NY Islanders 12485
Phoenix 9774
Notice - these teams are all the teams that are... failing. (Save for Colorado who had years and years of sell outs until recently...)
So the failing mark seems to be about 15000 seats. You'd need something bigger than the MTS Center.

Also - there is quite the big price difference between a MB Moose Luxury Box and an NHL Luxury Box... but I'm sure some of you NHL geniuses in here realized that already?!!?

The reason Edmonton has the Oilers is because we have people with big pockets here who were willing together and buy the team. This didn't happen in Winnipeg. Lack of money, or lack of support for the team, or no sound business plans... Nobody was willing to take a risk in piss-poor Winnipeg.

Winnipeg won't be getting an NHL team any time soon. Put down the crack pipes
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #798  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 12:07 AM
Pegger5 Pegger5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Proud to be from "The Peg"
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Well since you put it out there here are the rankings for household discretionary income: Calgary 1st, Edmonton 7th, Ottawa 24th and Winnipeg 79th. Hamilton ranks 51st. Winnipeg actually ranks worse in this category than household income, nice try!

Don't think I'm down on the NHL returning because I'm not, it's just that the reality of Winnipeg's demographics economically would make it difficult.
How about the highest debt ratio per capita. ALBERTA # 1 !!!
__________________
http://www.financialpost.com/magazine/fp500/list.html
TOP 800 -Winnipeg: 32 + 3 subsidiaries = 35
----------Edmonton: 25 + 1 subsidiary = 26
----------Quebec City: 16 + 2 subsidiaries = 18
----------Ottawa: 15 + 1 subsidiary = 16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #799  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 12:16 AM
Pegger5 Pegger5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Proud to be from "The Peg"
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Well since you put it out there here are the rankings for household discretionary income: Calgary 1st, Edmonton 7th, Ottawa 24th and Winnipeg 79th. Hamilton ranks 51st. Winnipeg actually ranks worse in this category than household income, nice try!

Don't think I'm down on the NHL returning because I'm not, it's just that the reality of Winnipeg's demographics economically would make it difficult.
2009 source to that information you posted ??

For the last time people, it will be actual companies buying the tickets, not individuals (not alone anyway) Soo, the point of disposible income is irrelevent for being able to afford season tickets..

rrskylar---I am starting to think you don't pay taxes... not that much anyway... People that support a good thing will look for ways to make it happen not ways to make it NOT happen like yourself.. So of course you must believe Chipman is a dumbass business person

I was looking and can not seem to find a positve post from you... You just seem happy adding to your post count...
__________________
http://www.financialpost.com/magazine/fp500/list.html
TOP 800 -Winnipeg: 32 + 3 subsidiaries = 35
----------Edmonton: 25 + 1 subsidiary = 26
----------Quebec City: 16 + 2 subsidiaries = 18
----------Ottawa: 15 + 1 subsidiary = 16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #800  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2009, 12:27 AM
Pegger5 Pegger5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Proud to be from "The Peg"
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
Notice - these teams are all the teams that are... failing. (Save for Colorado who had years and years of sell outs until recently...)
So the failing mark seems to be about 15000 seats. You'd need something bigger than the MTS Center.

Also - there is quite the big price difference between a MB Moose Luxury Box and an NHL Luxury Box... but I'm sure some of you NHL geniuses in here realized that already?!!?

The reason Edmonton has the Oilers is because we have people with big pockets here who were willing together and buy the team. This didn't happen in Winnipeg. Lack of money, or lack of support for the team, or no sound business plans... Nobody was willing to take a risk in piss-poor Winnipeg.

Winnipeg won't be getting an NHL team any time soon. Put down the crack pipes
You must forget what really happened or you are that young.
The NHL would not allow multiple (more than 1) Owners when a local Wpg group tried to buy the team. (not without a 100 million endowment fund).
Bettman finally changed his mind on that rule when Calgary and Edmonton were about to leave thus you are lucky to still have your team.. Edmonton had to have over 30 owners to survive. If Winnipeg had that chance they would still have a team. Also, read this link about arena size:
http://blogs.reuters.com/summits/200...always-better/
Research my friend, Research ! Oh and get out of this thread unless you have some real facts.
__________________
http://www.financialpost.com/magazine/fp500/list.html
TOP 800 -Winnipeg: 32 + 3 subsidiaries = 35
----------Edmonton: 25 + 1 subsidiary = 26
----------Quebec City: 16 + 2 subsidiaries = 18
----------Ottawa: 15 + 1 subsidiary = 16
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.