Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcappi
Dude, this project is UNDER CONSTRUCTION. Are you going to point out every chip, crumble or loose stone throughout the entire build? These buildings are over 100 years old. They will never look totally new, and I'm sure that they intend to repair the details before the property opens.
I'm assuming they are more concerned about finishing the structure/enclosing the building before any of that finishing work happens.
|
Yeah, I am going to point
this specific detail out, because that brick was already coming loose for quite a while, and they didn't do anything about it. An arch coming apart is a bit of a bigger issue as it provides structural support for the brick above it. esp. when it's the central arch.
Proper restoration work ensures that the facade is kept stabilized before construction work is done.
I have a right to express my opinion. If you don't like it that's your problem.
My only consolation is this is very common brick - probably even quarried from the lawrence rd brick quarry, so it will probably be a snap to fix without a loss in overall aesthetic. I do have to worry though if that arch is a major structural element in keeping the front of the building secure as it would be in roman times, or if there is structural metal above it. My issue is more a worry that it's structural integrity is compromised, not so much the aesthetic- although that's always a concern as well.
They did slap that bit of particle board on the front, which alludes to the fact there may already be a structural weakness there they are trying to shore up temporarily.
Remember the building beside the lister block - whose front end collapsed.