HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 11:12 AM
john doe's Avatar
john doe john doe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 189
LAS VEGAS | Stardust Imploded



Quote:

LAS VEGAS — The venerable Stardust casino-hotel on the Las Vegas Strip was imploded early Tuesday morning in a hail of fireworks to make way for Boyd Gaming Corp.'s $4.4 billion megaresort Echelon.

The property, known for its bargain rooms, friendly service and mobbed-up past, opened on July 2, 1958, billing itself as the world's largest resort hotel with 1,032 rooms.

It is also credited with being Las Vegas' first mass-market casino, thanks to cheap rates and loss-leading food and drinks.

The implosion of two towers, gutted to bare concrete and steel over the past three months, included a 32-story building that was the tallest ever felled on the Strip.

In its place, Boyd plans to build a new resort, Echelon, to open in late 2010 with more than 5,000 hotel rooms, a production theater, concert venue, shopping mall and more than 1 million square feet of meeting space.
Kind of sad, Stardust wasn't half-bad, but Echelon should be amazing.
__________________
Auckland's Building Count

Built: 104 | Construction: 28 | Destroyed: 11 | Proposed: 20 | Renovation: 2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 11:55 AM
cur_sed cur_sed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 138
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XOFTARtyWw

Boy, they sure do know how to do an implosion in Vegas - this is spectacular!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 12:49 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,326
Damn. It was one of my more favorites actually. I always liked the colors in the facade, and of course the sign was quite cool.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 11:04 PM
Distill3d's Avatar
Distill3d Distill3d is offline
Glorfied Overrated Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver (Burnaby), British Columbia
Posts: 4,151
that was freaking AWESOME!
__________________
The Brain: Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?

Pinky: I think so, Brain, but this time, you put the trousers on the chimp.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 11:22 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
I wouldn't be surprised if the implosion of the Luxor, MGM Grand and Excalibur all happen within my lifetime. Perhaps my children will see the Bellagio.
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 11:33 PM
MNMike MNMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,433
Have they considered saving any of these old casinos? I mean these old "kitchy" casinos are a big part of las vegas history and charm, it seems to me, and they don't seem to care at all. How many are left(seems like most have been torn down?)? Have any of the original ones been restored? I think it would be really cool, and somewhat chic, to re-do one back to its 1950s glamour. Has this ever been brought up or done? It just seems to me that they contnue destroying the little bit of history that they had with every one of these landmark casinos thats imploded Anyone agree, or am I crazy?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2007, 11:44 PM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 12,703
It was a great, quintessential Las Vegas hotel, and it's sad to see it go, but at least they gave it a spectacular, well-deserved farewell. Going out with a bang, heh.

A related Desert Inn demolition video with a nice shot of the then-operational Stardust behind. Man, that hotel (Stardust) was a classic and will be missed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8VcJ...elated&search=

Any Echelon renders/stats while we're at it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 12:03 AM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
Pacific Wonderland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bi-Situational, Portland & L.A.
Posts: 4,129
I would think that the Excalibur may not be too far off, it is a pretty miserable place in a fantastic location. Luxor could stick around for a while.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away"

travel, architecture & photos of the textured world at http://www.pixelmap.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 12:11 AM
GeorgeLV GeorgeLV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNMike View Post
Have they considered saving any of these old casinos? I mean these old "kitchy" casinos are a big part of las vegas history and charm, it seems to me, and they don't seem to care at all. How many are left(seems like most have been torn down?)? Have any of the original ones been restored? I think it would be really cool, and somewhat chic, to re-do one back to its 1950s glamour. Has this ever been brought up or done? It just seems to me that they contnue destroying the little bit of history that they had with every one of these landmark casinos thats imploded Anyone agree, or am I crazy?
What will really blow your mind is that the highrise tower was from 1990.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 12:52 AM
illmatic774's Avatar
illmatic774 illmatic774 is offline
came here by just comin
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Detroit, now at LAS VEGAS
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNMike View Post
Have they considered saving any of these old casinos? I mean these old "kitchy" casinos are a big part of las vegas history and charm, it seems to me, and they don't seem to care at all. How many are left(seems like most have been torn down?)? Have any of the original ones been restored? I think it would be really cool, and somewhat chic, to re-do one back to its 1950s glamour. Has this ever been brought up or done? It just seems to me that they contnue destroying the little bit of history that they had with every one of these landmark casinos thats imploded Anyone agree, or am I crazy?
The Flamingo still exists. It's beautiful, but that won't last very much longer either. Vegas doesn't care about it's history.

Built 61 years ago. (flickr photo courtesy of Wolfgang Staudt)


Last edited by illmatic774; Mar 14, 2007 at 12:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 12:52 AM
john doe's Avatar
john doe john doe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 189
Personally I hope they don't implode to many more of the 'older' towers, I actually think that a few of them, maybe The Luxor and New York, New York should be given protected status.
__________________
Auckland's Building Count

Built: 104 | Construction: 28 | Destroyed: 11 | Proposed: 20 | Renovation: 2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 12:59 AM
Derek Derek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,542
the video of this thing falling is amazing...i just saw it on the news
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 1:02 AM
GeorgeLV GeorgeLV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by illmatic774 View Post
The Flamingo still exists. It's beautiful, but that won't last very much longer either. Vegas doesn't care about it's history.
Of course we do. There are plenty of archival collections of old Vegas and of course there's the Neon Museum where you can find many of the old historic signs. We just care about property rights more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 1:05 AM
Urban Sky's Avatar
Urban Sky Urban Sky is offline
skeetskeetskeet
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami Previously: San Diego
Posts: 2,203
what a send off!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 1:49 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeLV View Post
Of course we do. There are plenty of archival collections of old Vegas and of course there's the Neon Museum where you can find many of the old historic signs. We just care about property rights more.
Sorry, but that's ridiculous. Saving old neon signs in a museum hardly makes Vegas anywhere near the top, or even middle, when it comes to preservation. Now, some may argue that preservation is over-rated, and I think one could make a decent argument for that, but to say Vegas cares about its history is pretty ridiculous, even for a newer city. I'm aware of quite a few historic sites within the city, as I've visited many, but let's not pretend Vegas does a good or even decent job in appropriately preserving its history.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 3:42 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Wink

What will happen when all of the water rights are exhausted or/ impending or eventual droughts are with us?

What happens to a desert city without water?

How can a small state proportion enough of the Colorado River to sustain its self?

I think the demise is closer than most will realize. La will get the water first, threw politics and population, and the gambling interests will follow anyone that will take them.

Other rosier senarios may take place. Maybe the Colorado will supply enough water to totally cover the southwest.

But in the long term, i guess, we are all fucked.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 3:50 AM
holladay's Avatar
holladay holladay is offline
Bombshell Vintage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,249
When Vegas starts to preserve its history it will only be because some corporation realized you can make money at it by marketing it as a tourist attraction. And if that happens it will be a 'corporate history' museum of the dime-a-dozen Coke Museum variety.

At any rate, whenever Vegas implodes an old casino it cleans a slate for itself to leave the small-scale of the earlier days literally in the dust. It's the perfect way for it to reinvent its own spectacle. Which, after all, is what Vegas is all about. Every few years you have to put up some obscene new montrosity and wave your flashy, neon-lit cock all around so that you simultaneously achieve 1) the instant degradation of all cultural standards of decency and 2) the virtually unstoppable flow of dollars from tourists' wallets right into your immense, fortified casino cashbox.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 4:01 PM
Caernavon Caernavon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Watertown, MA
Posts: 25
Why does Vegas keep doing this at night? Because it's Vegas, I suppose. Am I the only one who feels this way? I watched the video, and after the flashes you can't see anything because it's obscured by darkness and dust. For me, daytime demolitions are awesome; nighttime demolitions are just dark.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 5:49 PM
BobbyWLA BobbyWLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 831
There goes the historical casino where the Saved by the Bell crew stayed when Zack and Kelly had their wedding in Las Vegas. *sigh*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 7:10 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,875


It is kinda sad seeing the old gambling halls destroyed. Think about all the people that visited, and all the events that took place, in these old palaces, during the days of mob rule.

Makes me want to watch "Casino" or "The Cooler"

__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:23 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.