HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1501  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 11:26 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,956
There were hints that this district would bring a "full connection between two areas" of downtown. 1st thought is the area north of 75.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1502  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 11:29 PM
hudkina hudkina is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,445
I'm just afraid he'll put it over by MotorCity in an effort to get event attendees to go to his casino.

I really hope he puts it just north of I-75. The Cass Park area could easily become a great neighborhood, and this would obviously jump-start development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1503  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 2:12 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
I like the area north of I-75, but would the Cass, Clifford and Woodward bridges be enough of a connection to downtown to encourage pedestrians to traverse across the highway?

I wonder if they could do some sort of combination with sites two and three to encourage connectivity...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1504  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 2:45 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
Now that was quick...

Quote:
New Red Wings arena in Detroit Ok'd by Michigan Senate

LANSING, MI - A divided Michigan Senate on Wednesday approved fast-tracked legislation that the Ilitch family says is needed for an events center that could house a new Red Wings arena in downtown Detroit.

The proposed mixed-use development would be funded by private investment and existing dollars collected by the city's Downtown Development Authority. No new taxes would be needed to build the development, but lawmakers are passing a bill to allow the DDA to continue to get money for these kinds of developments.

The legislation was sent back to the House for final action before year's end.
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/in..._river_default
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1505  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 8:16 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan.jam View Post
I like the area north of I-75, but would the Cass, Clifford and Woodward bridges be enough of a connection to downtown to encourage pedestrians to traverse across the highway?
I imagine if they build the thing north of the Fisher, you better believe they'd enhance the bridges in some way.

BTW, maybe the renderings are somewhere still out there, but I remember when they were planning Comerica they showed an entire district behind the Fox that they hope would come to fruition. It never did, but I wonder if this isn't exactly what they are thinking about, now? To complete the plan. I believe it was called Adams Street-something, and, of course, was centered on Adams.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1506  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 6:50 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMich View Post
I imagine if they build the thing north of the Fisher, you better believe they'd enhance the bridges in some way.

BTW, maybe the renderings are somewhere still out there, but I remember when they were planning Comerica they showed an entire district behind the Fox that they hope would come to fruition. It never did, but I wonder if this isn't exactly what they are thinking about, now? To complete the plan. I believe it was called Adams Street-something, and, of course, was centered on Adams.
I think I know what renderings you're talking about and I was sure I had the webpage bookmarked. I think it was on some developer's website that had a connection to Illitch. Wasn't there a different name for Comerica Park before the naming right were given to them? It may have been Adams Street Stadium or Entertainment District, but I'm not sure.

Also, in my search for the mentioned stadium renderings, I found what an ideal "Fisher Greenway" would look like from Crain. Even this alone without the stadium would be a massive improvement for the area.


http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article...isher-greenway
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1507  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2012, 2:31 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
Agreed. The parts of the Fisher, Lodge and Chrysler Freeways that encircle downtown should all ideally be removed or covered in order to create a tighter--and more healthy--urban fabric.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1508  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2012, 8:20 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
I fear we're stuck with the layout of the freeways for the forseeable future. The city and states would have to match the feds, but even just matching the feds would prove difficult, cost-wise. In a perfect world, the Fisher would be removed entirely between the Lodge and Chrysler, and I-375 would be turned into an at-grade boulevard. But, the system is so pieceed together that taking out even a few blocks of a certain freeway renders entire sections of others useless.

BTW, while I don't expect any skyscrapers, I would hope that there'd be a few buildings in around these thing that would be above four floors. I mean, you don't want to waste these views and proximity with more Auburn-type developments this far south in Midtown. It should really started to build up higher the closer you get to downtown.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1509  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2012, 3:16 AM
hudkina hudkina is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,445
If Detroit ever had a true urban renaissance complete with Toronto/Chicago-style residential towers, the area south of Corktown would probably be the best place to start. Midtown should stick with the low-rise/mid-rise architecture with the occasional tower, while the skyline should stretch along the riverfront.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1510  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 1:20 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
Detroit by Design 2012 announced the winner of the Riverfront Competition:


1st Place | Atelier WHY | Hyun Tek Yoon | Soo Bum You
Jersey City, United States
http://www.aiadetroitbydesign2012.co...regNum=6619761

The Second Place entry is probably my favorite of the ones I've looked at:


2nd Place | Matthew Edward Getch | Maciej Woroniecki | John Coogan | Simon Ronan
London, United Kingdom
http://www.aiadetroitbydesign2012.co...regNum=1374305
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1511  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 1:50 AM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,956
I like the 2nd one for how radical it is, but I like the first one for how it preserves Hart Plaza's landmarks. Still, I think of of the other ones did a better job of creating a focal point.

I'm partial to this one. http://www.aiadetroitbydesign2012.co...ns/3502534.jpg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1512  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 2:33 AM
stormkingfan stormkingfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PhilaPA
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMich View Post
Moving in:
Glad to see that the Broderick got a second life.

Was a little worried about this bldg. I remember it well from my last visit to Detroit back in '99, with it's huge mural.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1513  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 2:58 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
The removal of the landmarks in the second place surprised me too. I think that the landmarks could still fit into the space nicely though.

I've been looking at some of the other proposals, and a reoccurring theme is to bury Jefferson Street between the freeways. My favorite of these proposals was the one that buried it with a smaller street on top and buried the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel with the entrance underground. I thought that was a really great way to expand the available space there.

In Other News: It appears that the Lafayette Towers may have been bought by Gregory Jackson, the CEO of Prestige Automotive Group. It'll be interesting to see what changes the new owner will make to the place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1514  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 3:12 AM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,522
Holy s@*t, They both look amazing. Is this really happening?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1515  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 3:17 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
Unfortunately, all the designs are still just visionary. The competition was put on my the American Institute of Architects-Detroit. The President of the Detroit RiverFront Conservancy was one of the jurors though, so some of the ideas could come to fruition eventually.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1516  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 6:17 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,100
Any of those would be pretty amazing. I hope they build something along these lines eventually.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1517  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2012, 11:29 PM
hudkina hudkina is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,445
I think they should take the second design and build it down by the Ambassador Bridge. The area bounded by the bridge, Fort St, Grand Blvd and the river would be great. It would anchor the western half the riverfront. It would give residents of Southwest Detroit better access to the riverfront.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1518  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2012, 7:06 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,305
Worth posting here. . .

New Thirst for Urban Living, and Few Detroit Rentals

Quote:
New York Times - December 11, 2012

Abandoned houses with overgrown yards may be the image most people associate with Detroit, but the city’s downtown and midtown neighborhoods have the opposite problem: a shortage of rental apartments to meet a growing demand for an urban lifestyle.

Developers say occupancy rates in these areas are at least 96 percent, spurred by young professionals, students and empty nesters who want an easy commute to school or work and a short walk to local cafes and bars.

more
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1519  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 8:13 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
Good to see the New York Times find out what was reported in Detroit media a year ago. lol But, no, really, always good to get good press.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1520  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 11:04 PM
hudkina hudkina is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,445
The NYT writes one of these fluff pieces every few months or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.