Posted Mar 25, 2012, 6:19 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,788
|
|
I'm glad they're doing this, but is there no where closer to MAX that could have been zoned this way? I mean, here we have a linear area of land that is 1) far away from the MAX line and 2) runs perpendicular to it anyway. As much as like seeing higher density requirements in the suburbs, this doesn't do much for me.
|