HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 12:44 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 34,725
Mostly a joke...

Mount Pearl.



__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 1:14 PM
Franco401 Franco401 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 1,205
Mt. Pearl doesn't look like a very interesting place to live, but one thing it has going for it is the terrain. Suburbs with hilly terrain, like those around St. John's, Saint John, Halifax, Vancouver, etc. are much more attractive, aesthetically speaking, than those in Southern Ontario, Quebec and the Prairies for that reason. If I had to live in any suburb and the city didn't matter, I'd take Quispamsis and North Van over Laval and Sherwood Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2016, 1:45 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
For a city of over 500 000 inhabitants and looking to overtake Vancouver in the next decade, Surrey doesn't (yet) have an amazing skyline. Granted, this photo is from an angle that is not the most impressive and is also taken all the way from Metrotown (Burnaby), some 14 kilometers away.

But with all tower plans and construction underway, the skyline will be transformed soon. The crane on the left is for 3 Civic Plaza which will be the tallest in the city with 48 floors and 163 meters (double the current height) once completed. That's in the epicenter of Surrey Central, right next to the city hall (not visible).


Last edited by Klazu; Jun 30, 2016 at 1:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2016, 1:57 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Double post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 7:46 AM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,485
One of my favorite threads . . . but, so sad, despondent, everyone seems to have forgotten . . . come on, post some pictures . . . please . . . .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 8:22 AM
skylinegazer's Avatar
skylinegazer skylinegazer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 245
nice one's by Klazu!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 4:03 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco401 View Post
Mt. Pearl doesn't look like a very interesting place to live, but one thing it has going for it is the terrain. Suburbs with hilly terrain, like those around St. John's, Saint John, Halifax, Vancouver, etc. are much more attractive, aesthetically speaking, than those in Southern Ontario, Quebec and the Prairies for that reason. If I had to live in any suburb and the city didn't matter, I'd take Quispamsis and North Van over Laval and Sherwood Park.
Calgary has some neat ones in the foothills.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 5:37 PM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
Ocean Breeze
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southwestern British Columbia
Posts: 1,202
Taken January, 2015


Burnaby Skyline, from Coquitlam Crunch Trail by Gerry Bates, on Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/echopr...-9P92PT-9P93CT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 8:19 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 68,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco401 View Post
Mt. Pearl doesn't look like a very interesting place to live, but one thing it has going for it is the terrain. Suburbs with hilly terrain, like those around St. John's, Saint John, Halifax, Vancouver, etc. are much more attractive, aesthetically speaking, than those in Southern Ontario, Quebec and the Prairies for that reason. If I had to live in any suburb and the city didn't matter, I'd take Quispamsis and North Van over Laval and Sherwood Park.

Well, Quispamsis is not particularly scenic. It's mostly just plain New Brunswick woods with suburban housing plopped down here and there in it.

It might be a bit more densely wooded than Sherwood Park, but I wouldn't say it's significantly more scenic.
__________________
The Last Word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 8:35 PM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Well, Quispamsis is not particularly scenic. It's mostly just plain New Brunswick woods with suburban housing plopped down here and there in it.

It might be a bit more densely wooded than Sherwood Park, but I wouldn't say it's significantly more scenic.
Excellent response to my plea. Thanks all.

It would be interesting to see shots around suburban Halifax, Quebec, Ottawa, all the Southern Ontario Cities, Calgary & Edmonton: all places with suburban high-rises that must appear from all sorts of vantage points. Skylines are interesting from considerable distance, like Burnaby above, but they are also interesting as you get closer to them and parts of them become a more immediate back drop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 10:15 PM
TownGuy's Avatar
TownGuy TownGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Cobourg, ON
Posts: 3,070
North York..and some hills.


North York
by Marcanadian, on Flickr


North York
by Marcanadian, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 1:14 AM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Calgary has some neat ones in the foothills.
Help me out here, exactly what part of Calgary is in the Rocky Mountain foothills because I thought those foothills generally started somewhere just to the east of Morley. Bragg Creek would be in the foothills, Cochrane is not. Springbank, not in the foothills. Bearpaw, not in the foothills.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 1:54 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
Metrotown, Burnaby's downtown.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 4:50 AM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Taken January, 2015


Burnaby Skyline, from Coquitlam Crunch Trail by Gerry Bates, on Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/echopr...-9P92PT-9P93CT
Is that the trail that goes straight up under the hydro line? If it is, I rode up that, but obviously missed the view. Now I'll have to do it again.

Love the North York pictures - it gives us a good idea what it might be like if we lived there and were just driving our normal routes. (Klazu's photo too: a view I see from time to time.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 7:05 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
The Metrotown and Edmonds skylines in Burnaby taken by me earlier today.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 12:49 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog View Post
Help me out here, exactly what part of Calgary is in the Rocky Mountain foothills because I thought those foothills generally started somewhere just to the east of Morley. Bragg Creek would be in the foothills, Cochrane is not. Springbank, not in the foothills. Bearpaw, not in the foothills.
After the flatness of the prairies I basically figured where the hills started was the foothills. I am an ignorant Ontarian.

(Also there is an electoral district in Calgary called Foothills.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 1:48 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Unapologetic Occidental
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 68,143
In the spirit of this thread, I'd say only the Vancouver area really has the "holy alliance" of true suburban skylines juxtaposed with very nice scenery.

Some suburban areas do have nice scenery. But their built form is still flat suburbia.

A few places on the south shore of Montreal are like this:

Mont-St-Hilaire:



St-Bruno-de-Montarville:



Closer to me, the suburbs of both Ottawa and Gatineau are generally unremarkable in terms of scenery (except for one or two exceptions on the northern outskirts of Gatineau), but the municipalities of Chelsea, Cantley, La Pêche and Val-des-Monts north of Gatineau are quite scenic. But they are more exurbia than suburbia.

__________________
The Last Word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2016, 12:21 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
I guess it is debatable what counts as a skyline but the suburbs around Halifax have a lot of highrise buildings now and some of those areas are scenic as well.

Armdale, Spryfield, Fairview. It is hard to see here but there's a glass office building on the far right that was the former HQ for Maritime Life, now part of Manulife:

Source


Bedford Basin

https://www.flickr.com/photos/urban_...x/14500739680/

Icon Bay, Rockingham:

Source


Good pictures of the suburbs are few and far between. Lately, most of the suburban construction in Halifax has been multi-unit buildings like these and midrise buildings in the 4-10 storey range. Aside from parts of Dartmouth which were mostly built before 2000 there aren't a lot of suburbs that are overwhelmingly detached houses.

Despite having a fair number of highrises a lot of these areas are not very pedestrian-friendly unfortunately. Some of them are okay for amenities and others have almost nothing. A lot of the suburbs in Atlantic Canada are very light on local amenities even if they are scenic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2016, 9:39 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Metrotown skyline taken by me today.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 12:10 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,837
The Metrotown skyline is always gorowing!

During my trip back to Canada this month I got a few pics of it myself:

Metrotown Summer Skyline by Ian, on Flickr


Metrotown Skyline by Ian, on Flickr

Skytrain Through Metrotown by Ian, on Flickr

Also a pic of the Edmonds area skyline in Burnaby:

Edmonds Summer Skyline by Ian, on Flickr
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.