HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7481  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 4:39 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,493
Looking at the first page, what if anything has ever happened with that Monongahela Tower?
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7482  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 4:45 AM
Found5dollar Found5dollar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinlee View Post
So those are some of the developments that I had been missing on page 1. Please let me know if these look right or if I'm missing any other major projects or if these are no longer moving forward. I think the Iron City Brewery plan fell apart.
Cmu has a bunch of new buildings planned/in the works for the addition/move of the tepper school onto the morewood parking lot. I hear that groundbreaking is going to be soon. They are moving carnival this year because of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7483  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 5:06 AM
Urbana's Avatar
Urbana Urbana is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Found5dollar View Post
Cmu has a bunch of new buildings planned/in the works for the addition/move of the tepper school onto the morewood parking lot. I hear that groundbreaking is going to be soon. They are moving carnival this year because of it.
I had no idea they were getting started so soon. I interpreted the announcement more as a statement of intention rather than concrete plans.

Speaking of which, you can finally start to see some progress on Scott Hall.

http://www.cmu.edu/cdfd/scott-hall/s...n-cameras.html

Edit: This article seems to indicate that they will break ground on the Tepper Quadrangle in Summer or Fall of 2015 - indeed, sooner than I thought.

http://thetartan.org/2013/11/25/news/tepper
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7484  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 11:30 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,071
There is a little snippet on the CMU project here:

http://buildingpittsburgh.com/2014/0...ts-out-to-bid/

Quote:
The year’s first big project opportunity, the new home for Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon, is advancing. On Feb. 21 the university short-listed three architects and construction managers for the $80 million +/- project. Staying in the hunt for the CM role are Mascaro, PJ Dick and Turner. Interviews are scheduled for mid-March.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7485  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 11:50 AM
CF Lion CF Lion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by doo dah View Post
Riverparc, perhaps?
Yeah, that's the one. Love the location. Bummer to hear that it's most likely dead.

A buddy of mine lives on Federal Street and thinks I should look up on the Northside. Perhaps I'll set my sights there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7486  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 11:56 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,071
Some interesting thoughts here from Jim Russell:

http://www.psmag.com/kickers/burgh-d...-talent-75455/

His basic point is that it appears migration/immigration is facing a permanent decline, which is a problem for places that have depended on importing skilled people, but not bad news for places like Pittsburgh which actually export skilled people thanks to their local colleges/universities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7487  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 3:00 PM
Found5dollar Found5dollar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 196
CMU just announced another 10 million donation to the school for the Tepper quad

http://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/arch...wartzgift.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7488  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 3:26 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,493


Pnc from 3 min ago.
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7489  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 4:47 PM
designer3d712 designer3d712 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post


Pnc from 3 min ago.
I took a look from the West End Bridge yesterday, and it looks like the top of the crane is close to the final height. I was comparing it to the K&L building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7490  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 6:03 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
Pnc from 3 min ago.
Nice.

That vantage provides one of the best (or worst, I guess) views of the notorious mid-Downtown highrise gap, and you can see how PNC Tower is going to plug right into it.

[Edit: And I must admit if the Oxford tower got built, it would likely do the same.]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7491  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 1:55 PM
SkyPittsburgh's Avatar
SkyPittsburgh SkyPittsburgh is offline
JasonInPGH
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 186
New planning commission presentation is up:
Selected highlights:
1. Duke is planning a theater on Locust and Seitz.
2. PennDOT is building a "Welcome to Squirell Hill" sign.
3. Approval of Hot Metal Flats

http://apps.pittsburghpa.gov/dcp/sch...ion-51-499.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7492  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 2:42 PM
dfiler dfiler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 335
If i'm understanding the hot metal flats blueprints, the first floor will be a disguised parking garage. That seems like a reasonable ground floor use for a block without storefronts. Although, entire neighborhoods structured like this could end up with a dead ambiance. Are there many other examples of this in the city? In Pittsburgh this practice appears to be relatively new.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7493  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 3:03 PM
SkyPittsburgh's Avatar
SkyPittsburgh SkyPittsburgh is offline
JasonInPGH
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfiler View Post
If i'm understanding the hot metal flats blueprints, the first floor will be a disguised parking garage. That seems like a reasonable ground floor use for a block without storefronts. Although, entire neighborhoods structured like this could end up with a dead ambiance. Are there many other examples of this in the city? In Pittsburgh this practice appears to be relatively new.
I think in some earlier drawings, there is a lobby on the ground floor as well as some small storefronts, but mostly the parking garage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7494  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 4:51 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,071
That proposed theater is on a whacky little site (triangular and sloping). It is nice to see them packing something in there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7495  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 5:07 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfiler View Post
If i'm understanding the hot metal flats blueprints, the first floor will be a disguised parking garage. That seems like a reasonable ground floor use for a block without storefronts.
There is a lobby/common-space area on the corner of Hot Metal and Sidney, but I believe that is mostly correct.

Quote:
Although, entire neighborhoods structured like this could end up with a dead ambiance. Are there many other examples of this in the city? In Pittsburgh this practice appears to be relatively new.
I'm not sure how common it is in existing projects, but I believe there is at least one more proposal like this for this part of South Side Works (east of Hot Metal). Buncher wants to do something similar with the apartment buildings behind the Produce Terminal, the East Liberty Transit Center/Eastside III will also be similar (although in that case the parking will be two levels and pushed back to the Busway side), East Liberty Place South is also similar . . . and I suspect we will see more in the future.

I agree this could be bad if it was the norm everywhere. However, it sure beats surface parking lots, and it can come off better or worse depending on how well they disguise it. I also think context matters a lot.

For example, in this case, the parts of South Side Works east of Hot Metal probably were never destined to become quite as walkable/commercial as the parts west of Hot Metal. That is because the serious pinching-down of the South Side Flats is beginning around there, the train tracks emerge from the tunnel, and so on. In fact, I am actually kinda amazed they jammed the SpringHill Suites in where they did--I don't like its surface parking lot and maybe that can be converted to structured parking/mixed-use eventually, but that was still an awkward lot and it is nice to see it being used.

Anyway, given all that, I am more or less fine with this particular example. As noted above, I am a little bummed they cut the height and unit count, but on the other hand, it appears they eliminated a level of parking, which helps with respect to this issue. So as long as it looks reasonable along Hot Metal Street, I think it will be a nice addition.

Last edited by BrianTH; Feb 28, 2014 at 5:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7496  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 6:21 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,071
Another potentially misleading article on population dynamics:

http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburg....html?page=all

This is a pretty amazing passage:

Quote:
But only 17 percent of CMU's undergraduate Class of 2013 stayed for jobs in Pittsburgh after graduation, said Kevin G. Monahan, associate dean of student affairs for CMU’s career center. About 15 percent of the university’s 2013 class came from Pennsylvania. . . . Experts say one of the biggest problems for Pittsburgh is welcoming outsiders, particularly foreign-born students.
So only 15% of the class came from the entire state of Pennsylvania, and 17% stated specifically in Pittsburgh? That's a nice net inflow, and certainly doesn't show prima facie that Pittsburgh is unwelcoming to outsiders, given that CMU is an elite national university (it would be sort of like accusing New Haven of being unwelcoming because a majority of Yale students do not stay there after graduation--that is not a reasonable measure of success).

That's not to say Pittsburgh can't do any useful things to help encourage even more graduates to stick around. But the danger in this sort of analysis is that it can encourage people to think in terms of relatively superficial things, whereas I suspect by far the most important thing the region can do to improve that net inflow is to continue to adopt policies and practices that make the region a better place to locate a business or live as a resident, whether or not all that is specific to "outsiders" or natives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7497  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 6:28 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,339
Agreed, BrianTH. This week's articles on Pittsburgh demographics from the Business Times were very poor and misleading. Of course, they were written by an intern.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7498  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 6:57 PM
dfiler dfiler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
There is a lobby/common-space area on the corner of Hot Metal and Sidney, but I believe that is mostly correct.

I'm not sure how common it is in existing projects, but I believe there is at least one more proposal like this for this part of South Side Works (east of Hot Metal). Buncher wants to do something similar with the apartment buildings behind the Produce Terminal, the East Liberty Transit Center/Eastside III will also be similar (although in that case the parking will be two levels and pushed back to the Busway side), East Liberty Place South is also similar . . . and I suspect we will see more in the future.

I agree this could be bad if it was the norm everywhere. However, it sure beats surface parking lots, and it can come off better or worse depending on how well they disguise it. I also think context matters a lot.

For example, in this case, the parts of South Side Works east of Hot Metal probably were never destined to become quite as walkable/commercial as the parts west of Hot Metal. That is because the serious pinching-down of the South Side Flats is beginning around there, the train tracks emerge from the tunnel, and so on. In fact, I am actually kinda amazed they jammed the SpringHill Suites in where they did--I don't like its surface parking lot and maybe that can be converted to structured parking/mixed-use eventually, but that was still an awkward lot and it is nice to see it being used.

Anyway, given all that, I am more or less fine with this particular example. As noted above, I am a little bummed they cut the height and unit count, but on the other hand, it appears they eliminated a level of parking, which helps with respect to this issue. So as long as it looks reasonable along Hot Metal Street, I think it will be a nice addition.
That's pretty much my sentiment. Surface lots are horrible in a medium-dense cities like pittsburgh. Using the ground floor for parking does create a lifeless zone without storefronts or windows into inhabited spaces. However it seems like a fair tradeoff when the reality is that many people lead a car centric lifestyle.

With this being a residential building, it is arguably even more appropriate. Ground floor apartment windows in an urban setting aren't terribly appealing. Even if you don't have to worry about burglars entering through a window, there is no privacy when your windows look directly onto a sidewalk.

I would hate to see entire neighborhoods of buildings with their ground floors as garages. But for streets without pedestrian destinations such as stores or restaurants, it appears to be a worthwhile, modern compromise.

As an interesting comparison, consider new vs old suburbs. Old suburbs put garages on the side or back of each lot. Newer suburbs attach garages the front of homes. In my opinion, the older neighborhoods are more pleasant. Rather than garage doors and driveways being the focal point of every home, there is actual architecture and landscaping held as paramount.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7499  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 7:11 PM
dfiler dfiler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Another potentially misleading article on population dynamics:

http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburg....html?page=all

This is a pretty amazing passage:

Quote:
But only 17 percent of CMU's undergraduate Class of 2013 stayed for jobs in Pittsburgh after graduation, said Kevin G. Monahan, associate dean of student affairs for CMU’s career center. About 15 percent of the university’s 2013 class came from Pennsylvania. . . . Experts say one of the biggest problems for Pittsburgh is welcoming outsiders, particularly foreign-born students.
So only 15% of the class came from the entire state of Pennsylvania, and 17% stated specifically in Pittsburgh? That's a nice net inflow, and certainly doesn't show prima facie that Pittsburgh is unwelcoming to outsiders, given that CMU is an elite national university (it would be sort of like accusing New Haven of being unwelcoming because a majority of Yale students do not stay there after graduation--that is not a reasonable measure of success).

That's not to say Pittsburgh can't do any useful things to help encourage even more graduates to stick around. But the danger in this sort of analysis is that it can encourage people to think in terms of relatively superficial things, whereas I suspect by far the most important thing the region can do to improve that net inflow is to continue to adopt policies and practices that make the region a better place to locate a business or live as a resident, whether or not all that is specific to "outsiders" or natives.
Agreed, that whole "pittsburgh is unwelcoming to outsiders" notion is based on rather illogical reasoning. "Experts say"? Only a couple of misinformed "experts" that recently got a tiny bit of publicity. I remember laughing at their conclusions when originally published.

The reason why pittsburgh hasn't seen an influx of immigrants in the past few decades is because nobody flocks to cities with high unemployment. When the steel mills were shutting down, there was massive unemployment and half of the city's population left to find work elsewhere. Half! And on top of that, there weren't even any construction or agricultural jobs to offer. Well of course foreigners aren't going to move to such a city.

And that's not coming from a born and bred yinzer who is feeling insulted. I came to study at CMU and ended up staying. As a student in a program with many foreigners, I got no impression of pittsburgh being particularly welcoming or unwelcoming to outsiders. To me, it seemed and seems pretty much average in that regard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7500  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2014, 7:20 PM
joenicholas9's Avatar
joenicholas9 joenicholas9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16
Quote:
Buncher Co. gives Pittsburgh 6 months to market Strip produce terminal

The city will get six months to work with other developers on the redevelopment of the Strip District's produce terminal under an agreement reached today with the Buncher Company.

The accord with the city's Urban Redevelopment Authority will give Mayor Bill Peduto time to evaluate "a third option" that keeps the produce terminal intact while providing Buncher with access to the surrounding land for its proposed $450 million Riverfront Landing residential and office development, said Kevin Acklin, the mayor's chief of staff.

...
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/re...s/201402280159
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.