HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #381  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2007, 9:57 PM
trvlr70 trvlr70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 2,245
^^^^^^^^^^^^
What an asshole!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #382  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2007, 10:16 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,480
^ headcase is that you?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #383  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2007, 10:43 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
The Central Loop, which encompasses the Roosevelt Road corridor, has experienced a surge of residential construction 230 percent greater than the Chicago Department of Planning and Development had forecast in 2003. People occupy 4,135 units, with thousands more on the way.


This is exactley why the Central Area Plan needs to be re-examined as planned by the city and why the Near South Community Plan should also be scrapped and redone. Niether of the guideline plans accounted for the sheer amount of new demand for downtown real estate. We should be planning for keeping up with market conditions, rather than putting a lid on our city's future potential. 230% over a forecast made 3 years ago, is insane and yet awesome at the same time. Demand for downtown living still is hot, hot, hot!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #384  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2007, 11:35 PM
headcase's Avatar
headcase headcase is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: East Village, Chicago
Posts: 455
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
^ headcase is that you?


You know, if you aged me about 10 years it wouldn't be too far off...

SSDD
__________________
He was constantly reminded of how startlingly different a place the world was when viewed from a point only three feet to the left.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #385  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 12:09 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
The Central Loop, which encompasses the Roosevelt Road corridor, has experienced a surge of residential construction 230 percent greater than the Chicago Department of Planning and Development had forecast in 2003. People occupy 4,135 units, with thousands more on the way.


This is exactley why the Central Area Plan needs to be re-examined as planned by the city and why the Near South Community Plan should also be scrapped and redone. Niether of the guideline plans accounted for the sheer amount of new demand for downtown real estate. We should be planning for keeping up with market conditions, rather than putting a lid on our city's future potential. 230% over a forecast made 3 years ago, is insane and yet awesome at the same time. Demand for downtown living still is hot, hot, hot!
^Absolutely! Do you think there's any change dpd will actually do this? I hope so. It is amazing what a difference 4 or 5 years has made in considering future potential...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #386  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 2:45 AM
itsnotrequired itsnotrequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukecuj View Post
Another Forumer at work...


'Artifact' stolen from Loop landmark

By Azam Ahmed
Tribune staff reporter
Published January 26, 2007, 2:39 PM CST


A man who snatched the top of a newel post from a landmark Chicago building may have thought he was getting away with a valuable architectural artifact, but it was just a reproduction—and police have his picture on a security video, authorities said today.

The incident occurred about 2:30 p.m., Jan. 12, at the Monadnock Building in downtown Chicago, police said. The decorative piece was removed from a staircase on the building's first floor, according to police Officer Marcel Bright.




Monadnock Building (Tribune archive photo by Alex Garcia)
July 17, 2004

Security video stills




A building security camera recorded the theft, and detectives are reviewing the video footage, Bright said. No arrests have been made in the incident.

Stills of the video obtained by the Tribune show a backpack-wearing man, who police believe is 35 to 40 years old, walking down a building corridor and into the stairwell. He removes a newel post top by hand from the top corner of a staircase and puts it in the backpack.

"These pictures are so brazen," said Tim Samuelson, cultural historian for the Chicago Department of Cultural affairs. But the theft of historical components from landmarks, he said, "is not that unusual, unfortunately."

Bill Donnell, one of the owners of the Monadnock, 53 W. Jackson Blvd., said the missing piece is a replica of the original newel post, which was replaced about 20 years ago. In the 28 years his group has owned the property, Donnell added, "I don't remember something like this ever happening before."

The Monadnock was the last skyscraper built as a masonry wall-bearing structure, requiring walls six feet thick at its base to support the weight of its upper floors, according to the City of Chicago's Landmarks Web site.

Designed by Chicago architects Burnham & Root and Holabird & Roche and completed in 1893, the Monadnock was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1970 and designated a Chicago city landmark in 1973, according to its Web site.

"I think this is someone maybe wanting a souvenir of a historic building to sit around," Samuelson said. "But if someone loves historic architecture that much why would they do something to destroy it?"
You missed the best part of the story:

Quote:
The ornament was one of about 200 newel post tops throughout the 17-story building at 53 W. Jackson Blvd. The remaining 199 are original cast iron fixtures; the stolen one happened to be the only replica, he said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #387  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 6:43 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukecuj View Post
A typical Home Depot store generates $43 million in yearly revenue
Great to hear about all the jobs and tax revenue just injected downtown.

Though I wonder why the bozos haven't updated homedepot.com yet to show that there's a new store there now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #388  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 6:58 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
^Absolutely! Do you think there's any change dpd will actually do this? I hope so. It is amazing what a difference 4 or 5 years has made in considering future potential...
Actually, yes! Sam Assafia from DPD has mentioned that the Central Area Plan "Really did not go far enough." (Btw, if you never heard this man speak before, go to a public lecture with him; he is the sermon preacher for the followers of urbanity. This brilliant man is also the one who brought the tall and thin ideas into city hall.). He is also stressing "Framing our natural reasources", that is, filling in land around the Lake, River and parks with higher densities and attractive buildings to make the spaces more active with people, and enhance our city's unique features.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #389  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 1:27 PM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
^ Do you know what his title or division is? I tried to find out more about him on the DPD website. Sounds like we're very lucky to have him. He's the one who came over from San Francisco, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #390  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 9:02 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is online now
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
http://chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/m...=n&searchType=

Barneys move may shake up Oak
Block of boutiques could see development wave

By Thomas A. Corfman and Eddie Baeb


Barneys New York is close to a deal that would move its Oak Street store across the street and double its size in a proposed new building, a development that would signal a dramatic transformation of the tree-lined block of quiet boutiques and salons.

The luxury department store would lease about 100,000 square feet in a five-story structure to be built on the site bounded by Oak, Rush and State streets, according to sources familiar with the negotiations between Barneys and developer Mark Hunt of Chicago-based M Development LLC. Mr. Hunt declines to comment.

Barneys would move in two years when its lease expires on its 46,000-square-foot store at 25 E. Oak St.

The Chicago location is a fraction of the size of Barneys' flagship stores in Manhattan and Beverly Hills, Calif. A spokeswoman for Barneys, a division of New York-based Jones Apparel Group Inc., didn't return calls for comment.

Oak Street, once a quaint strip of gray-stone and red-brick buildings, is already a haven for national and European luxury retailers such as Italian clothier Prada and French leather-goods designer Hermès. But a Barneys deal would be a key step in a wave of new development along Oak Street, including possibly the retailer's current site.

That, in turn, could boost other developers' chances of luring high-end retailers to nearby projects, such as the Elysian Hotel, under construction at Rush and Walton streets, and a proposed mixed-use development for a site at State and Walton that includes the Scottish Rite Cathedral, say real estate brokers not involved in the Barneys deal.

"With the lack of supply of high-rent, specialty-store space along Michigan Avenue, this deal could open up significant opportunities for new fashion and high-end-goods retailers to come to Chicago," says Stanley Nitzberg, a principal in Mid-America Real Estate Corp., an Oakbook Terrace-based retail real estate firm.

The new Barneys building could also include a Citigroup Inc. bank branch at the corner of State and Oak, sources say. The branch would move from a 6,800-square-foot storefront that's part of the Esquire Theater building at 58 E. Oak St., which is owned by Mr. Hunt. He is working up plans to replace the shuttered theater with a retail and boutique hotel development. If the Barneys move is completed, its current site is expected to draw interest from developers.

But the department store's current landlord also is expected to market the space to new tenants and could charge substantially higher rent. Barneys, which has been at the location since 1992, currently pays an estimated rent of less than $28 a square foot a year, not including taxes and expenses. That figure is well below the market on Oak, where prime street-level space can rent for $250 a square foot. Ben Ashkenazy, president of New York-based Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp. and a member of the landlord group, did not return calls requesting comment.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #391  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 9:40 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
^ Do you know what his title or division is? I tried to find out more about him on the DPD website. Sounds like we're very lucky to have him. He's the one who came over from San Francisco, right?

Yes, that's him. His title is Depty Cheif of Staff for Economic Development. The city is being pro-active and is having him lecture to community groups on the benifits of higher density TOD developement city wide.


I believe there is a really nice old building at Stae and Oak that would be leveled for that Barney's project. I really wish they would do something taller at Oak and Rush instead, but of course taller buildings is one of the 7 deadly sins to the folks who live over there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #392  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 10:08 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,480
^ If memory serves, there are a couple cool buildings on that site for the proposed new Barney's...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #393  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2007, 11:31 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
Actually, yes! Sam Assafia from DPD has mentioned that the Central Area Plan "Really did not go far enough." (Btw, if you never heard this man speak before, go to a public lecture with him; he is the sermon preacher for the followers of urbanity. This brilliant man is also the one who brought the tall and thin ideas into city hall.). He is also stressing "Framing our natural reasources", that is, filling in land around the Lake, River and parks with higher densities and attractive buildings to make the spaces more active with people, and enhance our city's unique features.
I think he's great and hope to hear him speak soon. I also love the fact that the city is actively getting him out there in front of the neighborhood groups so they can get some solid urban education. Love the theme of "framing our natural resources" - that's a winner if I ever heard one...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #394  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 2:30 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
^ If memory serves, there are a couple cool buildings on that site for the proposed new Barney's...
^ There is no need for any demolition in River North, considering all the existing parking lots.

How sad and pathetic...
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #395  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 6:43 AM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
Thumbs down What would be torn down for the new Barney's

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #396  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 7:05 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
Thumbs down

NO! Why tear something down?! Build on the existing vacant lots! I hate news like this!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #397  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 7:08 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
What is it about New York based companies coming to Chicago and messing with our buildings?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #398  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 3:02 PM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 547
Im sure Ill get bashed for this, but from what Im seeing recently, New York doesnt seem to have much respect for their older buildings (eg, the Drake to be demolished for a new hotel)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #399  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 3:28 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
943 N. is especially interesting. At the least, they should build a sliver building that would bring them more visibility and save this one in the process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #400  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2007, 4:10 PM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorisMolotov View Post
Im sure Ill get bashed for this, but from what Im seeing recently, New York doesnt seem to have much respect for their older buildings (eg, the Drake to be demolished for a new hotel)
I'm just sick of anything New York period.
IE, the whole Macy's thing!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:35 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.