HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 4:46 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by On Edge View Post
Why stand waiting 30 minutes in freezing rain with no shelter on a darkened backstreet for a filthy overcrowded bus, then have to transfer, wait again, and then walk to your destination, when you could simply drive?

Making driving harder does not help, there are always ways around the restrictions, or people will just put up with the congestion.

You need a good comprehensive and functional transit system. Not happening any time soon.
How about making driving more expensive to better account for its real costs? That would go a long way towards moving people to transit.

I also think you are a little harsh on OC Transpo. The buses aren't filthy, they are actually quite modern and comfortable. And you would also be amazed at how the GPS apps basically eliminate long waits for buses. Lastly, I'd say that overcrowded buses are certainly not the rule, particularly in this scenario that you conjure up involving a remote area on a dark and freezing-rainy night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 4:58 PM
Dr.Z Dr.Z is offline
From the Planning Paradox
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
How about making driving more expensive to better account for its real costs? That would go a long way towards moving people to transit.
How does that realistically happen? Politicians/decision-makers won't touch taxation.

The problem with roads is its an unmetered utility so there is no true user pays. The person that finds a way to meter it per person/vehicle should automatically when the top planning award. In all both countries.
__________________
"What about the children?! Won't somebody please think of the children!?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 5:05 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Z View Post
How does that realistically happen? Politicians/decision-makers won't touch taxation.

The problem with roads is its an unmetered utility so there is no true user pays. The person that finds a way to meter it per person/vehicle should automatically when the top planning award. In all both countries.
Even in the Netherlands road pricing per KM failed... I don't think it will happen until electric cars are >50% of the market.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 5:23 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
And you would also be amazed at how the GPS apps basically eliminate long waits for buses.
Well, when they work. There's still a lot of wrinkles in the system, especially "extras" which don't show up in real-time data, and, for some reason, too-frequent outages on weekends.

But yes, the real-time data has been a game-changer for the smart transit user.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 6:05 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Z View Post
How does that realistically happen? Politicians/decision-makers won't touch taxation.

The problem with roads is its an unmetered utility so there is no true user pays. The person that finds a way to meter it per person/vehicle should automatically when the top planning award. In all both countries.
Difficult without touching taxation. But a combination of gas taxes and revised tax rates on parking lots would certainly have an impact.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 8:06 PM
On Edge On Edge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
How about making driving more expensive to better account for its real costs? That would go a long way towards moving people to transit.

I also think you are a little harsh on OC Transpo. The buses aren't filthy, they are actually quite modern and comfortable. And you would also be amazed at how the GPS apps basically eliminate long waits for buses. Lastly, I'd say that overcrowded buses are certainly not the rule, particularly in this scenario that you conjure up involving a remote area on a dark and freezing-rainy night.
On a dark and freezing morning going to work, or afternoon coming home, between November and April.

I use the buses. They are often dirty, crowded, noisy, and grim. And often unreliable. As for making car drivers pay, etc. etc., go for it. They will mostly simply pay and keep driving.

Because transit is painful in Ottawa, and having and alternative to OCTranspo makes 99% of people feel relieved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted May 12, 2015, 8:31 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by On Edge View Post
As for making car drivers pay, etc. etc., go for it. They will mostly simply pay and keep driving.
that's good, because the model depends on many continuing to drive and pay so that the revenue can go towards much needed improvements to the transportation system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 3:33 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
I'm sure the city is crossing its fingers and praying that its share of the 38% tax paid on every drop of gasoline in the city drys up and disappears.

As for Brown talking about congestion preventing goods from getting to market and costing the economy - isn't that literally the exact reason given by Kathleen Wynne for collecting billions for Toronto to take cars off the city's streets. Like, the EXACT word-for-word rationale? Does she get a free pass because she has the magic red word in her party's name?

And who needs those nasty capitalist businesses, anyway? They're mean and are bad for lakes. We need an economy based on public sector workers and people on welfare. Watch the tax revenue pour in. You'll be tripping over piles of cash allotted to transit projects then. Especially after there's no more utilities and crown corp headquarters to sell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 3:36 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
I'm sure the city is crossing its fingers and praying that its share of the 38% tax paid on every drop of gasoline in the city drys up and disappears.

As for Brown talking about congestion preventing goods from getting to market and costing the economy - isn't that literally the exact reason given by Kathleen Wynne for collecting billions for Toronto to take cars off the city's streets. Like, the EXACT word-for-word rationale? Does she get a free pass because she has the magic red word in her party's name?


And who needs those nasty capitalist businesses, anyway? They're mean and are bad for lakes. We need an economy based on public sector workers and people on welfare. Watch the tax revenue pour in. You'll be tripping over piles of cash allotted to transit projects then. Especially after there's no more utilities and crown corp headquarters to sell.
The issue is that it's an incomplete way of looking at the problem. Hudak said "goods can't get to market on a bus" and for that reason we shouldn't build more transit in Niagara, only highways. Completely ignoring the fact that the best way to ensure highways are clear for freight traffic is to remove the need for passenger traffic to use them.

We know basically nothing about Brown at this point (other than his much-maligned social conservatism) but that will obviously change in the coming years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 8:30 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
The issue is that it's an incomplete way of looking at the problem. Hudak said "goods can't get to market on a bus" and for that reason we shouldn't build more transit in Niagara, only highways. Completely ignoring the fact that the best way to ensure highways are clear for freight traffic is to remove the need for passenger traffic to use them.
I'm not talking about Hudak. I'm talking about Brown. And Wynne, the politician who you constantly deflect for. And what both have said.

Hell, maybe if your beloved Ontario Liberals had actually plowed the highways over the past 5 years (instead of contracting it out to shady operators with poor equipment, doubling response times) there'd have been less congestion (and deaths). But who needs to move goods down the 401 and Trans-Canada, right? The world begins and ends with the GTA in this sleepwalking province.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 8:33 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
I'm not talking about Hudak. I'm talking about Brown. And Wynne, the politician who you constantly deflect for. And what both have said.

Hell, maybe if your beloved Ontario Liberals had actually plowed the highways over the past 5 years (instead of contracting it out to shady operators with poor equipment, doubling response times) there'd have been less congestion (and deaths). But who needs to move goods down the 401 and Trans-Canada, right? The world begins and ends with the GTA in this sleepwalking province.
Um... thanks for putting words in my mouth about my provincial political preferences? I voted Liberal in 2014 but it was very much a 'best of the worst' type choice.

Chill, dude.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 8:57 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,841
We need a balanced approach when it comes to transportation. We just have to look back to the last Conservative government and there ongoing lack of investment in transit (next to none) and even highways. Who sold off the 407? As far as snow plowing being contracted out, isn't that exactly the conservative way of doing things?

I know the current government has many problems, but the investment in public infrastructure after so much neglect is a breath of fresh air.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 11:44 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
That's typical. Give the party that does something foolish and damaging a free pass because it resembles something a party you don't like would do.

Same actions, but one is to be applauded, the other condemned. High standards, we have.

Are you sold on selling off the public utility Hydro One too, because after all, it's something the conservatives would do?

A government of any stripe should apply proper accountability and controls to anything they outsource, and the lowest bidder on the road clearing contract didn't even have the proper amount of equipment to handle the task. But the (bargain basement) price was right, and how can a government check these things, what with all the billions of dollars and thousands of people paid to check these things?

Same things happened with the air ambulance service.... hmm.

Snow clearing after big storms went from just over 2 hours to nearly 5. And it took 5 years for anyone to notice. But that's fine. You and your family wer put in danger, but they're not conservatives, so we'd better not demand better from our government!

In the past 3 provincial elections, I've voted for 3 different parties, so don't think that I'd only ever vote for one. I hate bad governance, and this province has it in spades. But it will continue if every screwup and cynical move is quietly tolerated because a party we like less exists.

Last edited by S-Man; May 13, 2015 at 11:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted May 13, 2015, 11:50 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
LRT's friend: please forgive me if I'm a little (a lot?) hot under the collar about that issue, but years of conversations with friends who were born into a voting block (never to leave) have made me sick to my stomach on the whole polarized politics/moral equivalency thing. Ugh.

As for transit, yes, it's nice the province let the city have some of its own money back. Let's hope the $$$ is there when we need to make the downpayment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted May 14, 2015, 1:18 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,466
I've met people firmly in voting blocs, from multiple sides of the spectrum, so I can understand the frustration. Rest assured I'm not a bloc voter. I always weigh all options in elections.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted May 14, 2015, 2:48 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
I'm not talking about Hudak. I'm talking about Brown. And Wynne, the politician who you constantly deflect for. And what both have said.

Hell, maybe if your beloved Ontario Liberals had actually plowed the highways over the past 5 years (instead of contracting it out to shady operators with poor equipment, doubling response times) there'd have been less congestion (and deaths). But who needs to move goods down the 401 and Trans-Canada, right? The world begins and ends with the GTA in this sleepwalking province.
I will give Wynne credit: she's spending more time and paying more attention to Ottawa issues than any Premier before her that I can recall. Certainly more so than the recent occupant of that office who was, theoretically at least, an Ottawa MPP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 7:51 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,860
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2015, 2:40 PM
MoreTrains MoreTrains is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 858
Quote:
4. Expropriate Bulldog World Headquarters;
Lets hope this is true!
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.