HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:00 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Oakridge Park | 13 Towers | 154m | 52fl | 5M sqft | U/C

For all that were getting a bit envious of Burnaby and their mall redevelopment, Vancouver has it's own version.

Quote:
enriquez Partners Architects has applied to the City of Vancouver to amend the existing CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District By-law for 650 West 41st Avenue (Oakridge Centre). The proposed amendment would change the CD-1 (1) By-law to develop a 45-storey mixed-use development consisting of 110 889 m² of commercial, 39 418 m² of office, 4 181 m² of amenity, and 250 646 m² of residential, with a total floor space ratio (FSR) of 3.54. The proposal includes 2,818 units with a maximum height of 125.6 m (412 ft.), and 6,694 parking spaces.
This will be a large development. It will be interesting to watch this one work it's way thru the city. Definitely a project that could use the support of forumers speaking to council when the time comes.

Project Stats
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/.../projstats.pdf

Site Context
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ts/context.pdf

Site History
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ts/history.pdf

Design Parameters Retail/Major Anchor
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...nts/retail.pdf

Design Parameters Residential
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ents/resid.pdf

Urban Design Permeability / Connectivity
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ud_connect.pdf

Urban Design Street Edges
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/.../ud_street.pdf

Urban Design Arrangement of Heights
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ud_heights.pdf

Urban Design Real City Mixed Use
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...s/ud_mixed.pdf

Proposed Development Public Realm
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...p_pubrealm.pdf

Proposed Development Transportation and Circulation
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...prop_trans.pdf

Proposed Development Residential
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...s/prop_res.pdf

Proposed Development Office
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...rop_office.pdf

Proposed Development Shadow Studies
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ts/shadows.pdf

Model Views
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...ents/views.pdf

Ground Floor Plan
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...oorplan_gr.pdf

Upper Floor Plan
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...oorplan_up.pdf

Podium Floor Plan
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...orplan_pod.pdf

Low Rise Floor Plan
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...orplan_low.pdf

High Rise Floor Plan
http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/...rplan_high.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:30 AM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Some really cool initial conceptual designs there!

No doubt, it'll get toned down, but 45 stories at Oakridge. I likey.
__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:46 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,131
wow so they will demolish the bay and zellers and move both of them to front on 41st? did i understand all that right?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 6:19 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,828
Isn't 125.6 meters really short for 45 floors? 45 X 3 is 135 meters. Unless they mean floor # count (excluding all the 4s knowing it will be Chinese buying all these units again, honestly, with how many condo they buy one would think metro-Vancouver's population is 90% Chinese now).

Overall a great looking concept. I see some of the original buildings will be retained.

Also, in the models the tallest tower looks much shorter than 125.6 meters.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 2:54 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,629
Finally! I've been waiting so patiently for these to be released. That looks absolutely spectacular.

Any idea on the buildout and timing? I'm guessing phase 1 will begin within a few months, but the bulk of this project looks to be a 10 - 15 year buildout.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 2:58 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,675
Overall looks great.

I don't see them getting 45 storeys, but I'm guessing their strategy is to ask for it and expect ~35 storeys.

The office component is a little disappointing. Wasn't expecting highrise or anything, but it would've been nice to see one or two self contained lowrise office buildings rather than just tacked-on podiums.

6,700 parking spaces seems like a ton of parking at first glance but I guess it makes sense given all the density and retail. For reference, Metropolis at Metrotown has 8,000 stalls apparently...

Glad the design was given to Henriquez and not JKMC!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 3:37 PM
TwoFace's Avatar
TwoFace TwoFace is offline
Dig-it
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 956
Very impressive, a city within a city.
All they need is a pool and a park and I'm in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 4:15 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
8'6" is the standard height for a residential floor.
Obviously buildout will depend on market conditions and due to the need for phasing around an operational mall, it would be safe to assume ~10yr buildout, could be even quicker.

This is still at the high level and I'm sure we'll see some additional fine tuning before we see things started. It will certainly increase ridership along the Canada Line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 4:33 PM
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth Smooth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 906
Too bad that it looks like they'll be keeping the mid-rise brown-brick building at the corner of 41st & Cambie. It would be nice if that entrance was more grand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:42 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,056
Nice. See. Malls are perfect areas to densify. Go go Surrey Central and Guildford imo. Oakridge will turn out to be a nice center if and when this gets done. Even if it gets toned down a bit but I have my doubts with Canada Line now. Oakridge is really in a great spot Vancouver wise.

Easy to get to UBC, Richmond, and Downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:46 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,593
Nailed it. Some of the architectural elements may need a little finessing but the overall concept is amazing. As I look down on Park Royal every day from my office and shake my head at how half-assed their current expansion is, this plan for Oakridge makes me smile (and cry a little, at what could have been at Park Royal). Looking forward to seeing this project move along. This may well be the best project in the city, better even that BIG's Beach and Howe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
Too bad that it looks like they'll be keeping the mid-rise brown-brick building at the corner of 41st & Cambie. It would be nice if that entrance was more grand.
They didn't really have too much of a choice there as there is a 50 unit residential strata project on top of the office portion. It would have meant dealing with and trying to buy out 50 individual owners. Obviously Westbank/Cambridge thought that they would be able to work around then (they have). And the proposed roof that covers part of the 41st & Cambie intersection reminds me of the Metropol Parasol in Seville (although probably made of glass), and I figure that will make the entrance quite grand.



More info: Architizer: Metropol Parasol
__________________
Flickr

Last edited by wrenegade; Oct 30, 2012 at 5:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:50 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
8'6" is the standard height for a residential floor.
Obviously buildout will depend on market conditions and due to the need for phasing around an operational mall, it would be safe to assume ~10yr buildout, could be even quicker.

This is still at the high level and I'm sure we'll see some additional fine tuning before we see things started. It will certainly increase ridership along the Canada Line.
Still seems short, there seems to be many residential towers with 45 to 50 floors that are considerably taller.

Anyways, 10 year build out for a project this large seems pretty optimistic...would be great, but I am not holding my breathe.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 5:59 PM
TwoFace's Avatar
TwoFace TwoFace is offline
Dig-it
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 956
Sign me up for Tower #12 South/West view.

Not sure I would want to be an owner when all that green space on top of the commercial buildings needs a new water-proofing sealant replacement though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:14 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Wow this will completely transform Oakridge from the dull and uninteresting place it is now.

Those Earthwork towers must've been inspired by Milan's vertical forest towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:21 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Wow this will completely transform Oakridge from the dull and uninteresting place it is now.

Those Earthwork towers must've been inspired by Milan's vertical forest towers.
Are those for real?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:28 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Are those for real?
Yep, it's under construction: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Verticale.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 9:30 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,828
Seems like with that much vegetation on a building it would require a lot of upkeep and structural monitoring. Trees are amazingly good at cracking rocks apart over the years
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 11:17 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
It's amazing how daft the landscape consultants can be. There's a new living wall at a condo in town here that's about 6-7 storeys tall, and the only way to maintain it is with a huge cherry picker that involves having to hire multiple flag-persons for pedestrians and traffic to be re-routed. If that were my wall, I'd personally poison it and shut it down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2012, 11:22 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,292
Geez, I looked at my calendar to see whether it was April Fool's Day - but it wasn't....

Those point towers must be the cleanest Henriquez design I've ever seen. Nice mix of styles and massings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
wow so they will demolish the bay and zellers and move both of them to front on 41st? did i understand all that right?
All the more of a shame that there won't be continuous streetfront retail on the north side of 41st Ave.

Last edited by officedweller; Oct 30, 2012 at 11:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2012, 2:59 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Amazing! I hope this gets approved....and yes, those 40+ towers included.

One thing I'd like to see changed: I hope all of the outdoor pedestrian mall areas are completely covered to protect from wind and rain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.