HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 20, 2019, 8:12 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,017
2018 Population Estimates of US Cities

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pres...estimates.html

Census Bureau to Embargo New Local Population and Housing Unit Estimates
MAY 14, 2019
RELEASE NUMBER CB19-67

MAY 14, 2019 — The U.S. Census Bureau will offer a two-day media embargo period for subscribers to view the 2018 population estimates for local governmental units, including incorporated places, minor civil divisions and consolidated cities. Housing unit estimates will also be released for the nation, states and counties.

When: Tuesday, May 21, at 10 a.m. EDT to Thursday, May 23, at 12:01 a.m. EDT.

Where: Census Bureau’s embargo site.

Interview requests: Embargo subscribers may interview Census Bureau experts during the embargo period. To request an interview, email pio@census.gov.

Obtain media embargo access: Visit census.gov to register for embargo access.

The embargoed information may not be published, broadcast, posted online, distributed via wire and distribution services, or shared with a nonembargo member until the public release date and time. The public release will be at 12:01 a.m. EDT, Thursday, May 23.

Embargo subscribers are encouraged to confirm that their login user name and password are up to date prior to May 20. For assistance, please email pio@census.gov.

###
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 6:55 AM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. View Post
https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pres...estimates.html

Census Bureau to Embargo New Local Population and Housing Unit Estimates
MAY 14, 2019
RELEASE NUMBER CB19-67
...
What is the rationale for this? Why does it matter if localities get the data first?
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 7:02 AM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
What is the rationale for this? Why does it matter if localities get the data first?
Seems like its just a way to make sure information is provided to local authorities have census data before the public to make sure they are aware of/prepared to make statements about the results?

Id assume this is a request by local governments who many times find out Census news by local media instead of the feds directly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 7:18 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,094
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 8:02 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,050
Here are the top 15 most populated Cities according to the 2018 census numbers:


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...lous-city-list
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 11:15 AM
azliam azliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 789
The 15 Fastest-Growing Large Cities Between July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018, With Populations of 50,000 or More on July 1, 2017

Rank/Area Name/State/Percent Increase/2018 Total Population

1. Buckeye, AZ 8.5 74,370
2. New Braunfels, TX 7.2 84,612
3. Apex, NC 6.8 53,852
4. Frisco, TX 6.1 188,170
5. Meridian, ID 6.1 106,804
6. McKinney, TX 5.4 191,645
7. Georgetown, TX 5.2 74,180
8. Rowlett, TX 5.1 66,285
9. St. Cloud, FL 5.0 54,115
10. Ankeny, IA 4.6 65,284
11. Dublin, CA 4.5 63,445
12. South Jordan, UT 4.4 74,149
13. Midland, TX 4.4 142,344
14. Castle Rock, CO 4.3 64,827
15. Round Rock, TX 4.3 128,739

The 15 Cities With the Largest Numeric Increase Between July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018, With Populations of 50,000 or More on July 1, 2017

Rank/Area Name/State/Numeric Increase/2018 total population

1. Phoenix, AZ 25,288 1,660,272
2. San Antonio, TX 20,824 1,532,233
3. Fort Worth, TX 19,552 895,008
4. Seattle, WA 15,354 744,955
5. Charlotte, NC 13,151 872,498
6. Austin, TX 12,504 964,254
7. Jacksonville, FL 12,153 903, 889
8. San Diego, CA 11,549 1,425,976
9. Denver, CO 11,053 716,492
10. Frisco, TX 10,884 188,170
11. Columbus, OH 10,770 892,533
12. Henderson, NV 10,759 310,390
13. McKinney, TX 9,888 191,645
14. Las Vegas, NV 9,016 644,644
15. Miami, FL 8,884 470,914


https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pres...estimates.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 3:50 PM
manchester united manchester united is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
Here are the top 15 most populated Cities according to the 2018 census numbers:


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...lous-city-list
Why this confusion about the NYC population? The 2017 estimate was 8,622,698, while the 2018 estimate is only 8,398,748!! But the absurdity is that everyone says that NYC lost 39,523 inhabitants from 2017 to 2018.........Where is the error?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 3:52 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by manchester united View Post
Why this confusion about the NYC population? The 2017 estimate was 8,622,698, while the 2018 estimate is only 8,398,748!! But the absurdity is that everyone says that NYC lost 39,523 inhabitants from 2017 to 2018.........Where is the error?
If there was a change in methodology they might have revised down several years but IDk for sure you need to look real deep into the census reports to figure it out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 4:51 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
If there was a change in methodology they might have revised down several years but IDk for sure you need to look real deep into the census reports to figure it out.
Yeah, the current Census table has NYC's 2017 estimate at 8,438,271. Not sure where the 8,622,698 number came from, but if that's accurate, it was probably revised down. Also worth remembering that (and I think this is accurate) the yearly estimates are all estimates of growth since the last official census in 2010, not necessarily growth since 2017. So NYC "losing" population may or may not be accurate, depending on whether the 2017 estimate was accurate, whether methodologies changed, whether one year was on a different end of the margin of error than the previous year, etc. More accurate to say that as of 2018 NYC is estimated to have grown ~220,000 people since 2010.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 4:27 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by manchester united View Post
Why this confusion about the NYC population? The 2017 estimate was 8,622,698, while the 2018 estimate is only 8,398,748!! But the absurdity is that everyone says that NYC lost 39,523 inhabitants from 2017 to 2018.........Where is the error?
I discussed on another thread that I thought the 2017 estimates for NYC were very inflated. The numbers for the five boroughs did not even remotely tie to the numbers for the MSA, CSA, or NY State.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 5:40 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,327
So, at the rate Fort Worth is growing, they would pass Austin again in 10 years by 1,234 people.

19,552 x 10 + 895,008 = 1,090,528

12,504 X 10 + 964,254 = 1,089,294
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 5:48 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,815
I thought LA passed the 4 million mark years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 5:55 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I thought LA passed the 4 million mark years ago.
Dont confuse cities with metros.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 6:19 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I thought LA passed the 4 million mark years ago.
A California-generated report concluded that the city passed 4m people in 2017. I don't think the Federal Census has had the same results, and the current yearly estimates are all below 4m.

https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/l...-four-million/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 6:44 PM
Austin55's Avatar
Austin55 Austin55 is offline
__________
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 4,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
So, at the rate Fort Worth is growing, they would pass Austin again in 10 years by 1,234 people.

19,552 x 10 + 895,008 = 1,090,528

12,504 X 10 + 964,254 = 1,089,294
Data says both are growing at 20.2%, are you sure FW could catch up?

https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/...html?src=bkmk#


Fort Worth did overtook both Columbus and San Francisco from the 2017 estimates, and should overtake Jacksonville in the next few months (only 7k behind and adding 18k a year for the past 8 years)
__________________
Fort Worth Urban Development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 10:09 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,580
If Toronto and Montréal would be in that list, they would rank 3rd and 6th.

Toronto is +- 3M people , Montréal is +- 1.8M ( The island of Montréal +- 2.1M )

Both cities are growing fast . I don't have the stats for Toronto, but Montréal added 37k , July 1st 2017 to July 1st 2018.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 10:49 PM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 874
FYI to all:

Every year, the US Census Bureau revises the estimates for all previous years going back to the last census. In other words, the original estimates for 2011 that were released in 2012 have been revised 6 times since then (and will be revised again next year).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 11:43 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill View Post
FYI to all:

Every year, the US Census Bureau revises the estimates for all previous years going back to the last census. In other words, the original estimates for 2011 that were released in 2012 have been revised 6 times since then (and will be revised again next year).
Good to know, In case anyone is wondering the BLS does the same stuff, they are constantly revising employment data going back years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 11:48 PM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
More interested in urban areas.

Columbus is not bigger than San Francisco.
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 24, 2019, 12:10 AM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen View Post
More interested in urban areas.
Me too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.