NEW YORK | Eventi (839 Sixth Avenue) | 614 FT / 187 M | 53 FLOORS | T/O - Page 4

Jularc · #61 Posted **Apr 16, 2009, 3:18 AM**

April 15, 2009:

NYguy · #62 Posted **Apr 16, 2009, 5:59 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jularc

April 15, 2009:

Still think it's a monstrosity. Those bare walls don't help. Typical that this would be the only one of the "three" rising.

antinimby · #63 Posted **Apr 16, 2009, 4:52 PM**

What I don't understand is why put up a facade wall on the sides when there wasn't a concrete load bearing wall there before.

Lecom · #64 Posted **Apr 18, 2009, 6:57 PM**

Somewhere between "meh" and "sucks".

photoLith · #65 Posted **Jun 7, 2009, 11:56 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lecom

Somewhere between "meh" and "sucks".

I choose "sucks"

vandelay · #66 Posted **Jun 8, 2009, 12:10 AM**

Reminds me of 101 Warren if it were made into Soviet housing.

THE BIG APPLE · #67 Posted **Jun 8, 2009, 8:32 PM**

Remember the bare wall aren't there for long. When it gets higher they're putting glass, look at the renderings.
Up to floor 36-40.

Antares41 · #68 Posted **Jun 11, 2009, 4:17 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE BIG APPLE

Remember the bare wall aren't there for long. When it gets higher they're putting glass, look at the renderings.
Up to floor 36-40.

If the bottom portion is dreary and the top portion is spectacular, then on average the building is just ok. We will just have to wait and see.

scalziand · #69 Posted **Jun 11, 2009, 6:44 PM**

Let me provide a vaguely plausible but ultimately rubbish explanation for the blank walls on the lower portion: It is the developer's attempt to contextualize the design, the blank walls being modeled on the blank walls of other buildings that anticipated future construction.

Then again if that is the actual explanation..

THE BIG APPLE · #70 Posted **Jun 11, 2009, 9:09 PM**

It would be better if both bare walls were glass. At least it'll look good from the ESB.

antinimby · #71 Posted **Jun 15, 2009, 2:34 AM**

This one is starting to become very mediocre.

NYC2ATX · #72 Posted **Jun 15, 2009, 2:43 AM**

You know what, the way I see it, it's not the best new building going up in Manhattan right now, but it could be a lot worse. I actually happen to like the lower part of the Sixth Avenue facade. It's pretty cool and unique.

THE BIG APPLE · #73 Posted **Jun 15, 2009, 4:15 AM**

See glass everybody. Something is better than nothing in Manhattan.

Lecom · #74 Posted **Jun 15, 2009, 7:54 PM**

Adds a nice canyon presence to 6th Ave, at least

NYguy · #75 Posted **Jun 22, 2009, 11:41 AM**

Two of the "three" under construction, as viewed from the Empire State...

Lucas Hantz

philvia · #76 Posted **Jun 22, 2009, 5:34 PM**

the cladding on this is just retarded. would have been nice to just continue all the way up with the lower facade

RoldanTTLB · #77 Posted **Jul 5, 2009, 7:33 PM**

What an odd building. It's like they took 101 Warren, value engineered it, then stretched the glass crown some 30 stories. I don't quite get it (and I LOVE 101 Warren).

Lecom · #78 Posted **Jul 6, 2009, 1:26 AM**

Eh... it's a curious building, for sure... Got some dreary parts but at least the material quality is nice. Not sure what to make of it yet, but id doesn't look downright bad IMO. It's one of those cases where you just have to wait to see the thing finished before a final definite judgement.

RoldanTTLB · #79 Posted **Jul 8, 2009, 5:38 PM**

From (about) Herald Square:

NYguy · #80 Posted **Jul 9, 2009, 9:12 PM**

curbed