Quote:
Originally Posted by LFRENCH
In theory the problem is that with the plus 15 system, theoretically the only public place is the skywalks themselves, which obviously have no way to get up there without going into a private space(office towers). Some would argue that this transition of public to private vibrancy would be a more exclusionist model, as it would allow the private landowners to more effectivaly regulate the space within the office towers.
now the natural counter would be well isn't it always like that?
this is more some of the critiques of it, not necessairly my view
|
This argument does have some merit, the privatisation of urban space is a concern for the integration of the community as a whole. This is true in many aspects of urban development, there are some good examples of this all over the world (gated communities in the US, enclosed condo tower complexes, etc.).
For the Plus 15 system, this is an issue as well. However, the nature and development of the system has reduced the impact of this privatization in restricting access. The sheer size and complexity ( over 16km of paths, hundreds of entrances) of the system resists any single private interest from affecting the balance of the system.
Do you know if the system is entirely privately owned? are some portions considered in the public domain? I would imagine that the building owners have controll of their respective sections.